Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 17:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1428
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 370 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2008, 11:09
Clearly B.
Manager
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 76
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2009, 05:54
Editorial:

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue
to be observed once approval is longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second
is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B. The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion
that was drawn from that observation.
C. The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial
opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was
used to support the proposal.
D. The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial;
the second is that main conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the
second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1846
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 52

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2009, 07:20
A. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second
is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial. Editorial did not dispute the accuracy
B. The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion
that was drawn from that observation. Editorial did not dispute the accuracy
C. The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial
opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was
used to support the proposal. There's no proposal at that point
D. The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial;
the second is that main conclusion. Yes.
E. The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the
second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion. Its the reverse of D

So D
_________________

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 303
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 137 [2] , given: 15

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2009, 07:27
2
KUDOS
ankur55 wrote:
Editorial:

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue
to be observed once approval is longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second
is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B. The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion
that was drawn from that observation.
C. The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial
opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was
used to support the proposal.
D. The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial;
the second is that main conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the
second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.

C for sure
If you dissect the whole paragraph into logical parts, you have the first bold face as evidence/fact based on which a proposal is made, and the author's main intention is to oppose this proposal. So main conclusion is refuting the proposal
The second part is a judgement or a reasoning given which supports the proposal made.
Manager
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 76
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2009, 07:46
rashminet84 wrote:
ankur55 wrote:
Editorial:

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue
to be observed once approval is longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second
is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
B. The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion
that was drawn from that observation.
C. The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial
opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was
used to support the proposal.
D. The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial;
the second is that main conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the
second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.

C for sure
If you dissect the whole paragraph into logical parts, you have the first bold face as evidence/fact based on which a proposal is made, and the author's main intention is to oppose this proposal. So main conclusion is refuting the proposal
The second part is a judgement or a reasoning given which supports the proposal made.

Ya OA is C.
Thanks for very nice explanation.
+1 for you
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 303
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2009, 08:14
thanks
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 849
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 106

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2009, 08:04
Agree with C.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2011, 22:33
Well, m stuck between B and D..... Why B cannot be the answer?
_________________

"Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it"
- Sir Winston Churchill

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 704
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 37

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2011, 07:40
+1 for B. This is good question for practicing bold face.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2008
Posts: 65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2011, 11:03
IMO B
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 5

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 15:27
I have chosen the answer C for this question:

The structure of the passage is as follows
- The first 2 sentences are used as facts to introduce the topic and situation
- The next sentence describes the efficiency experts observation
- The next sentence is the efficiency experts conclusion
- The last sentence is the editorial's main conclusion

Notice that the main conclusion of this passage is that the editorial rejects the efficiency experts conclusion.

A. This cannot be the correct answer. The first part of the answer choice is incorrect because the accuracy of the first boldface is not disputed by the editorial. The second part of the answer choice states that the second boldface is a conclusion that supports the main conclusion. We know immediately that this is not true because the editorial rejects the experts conclusion.

B. The first part of the answer choice is incorrect. The editorial never disputes the observation; Instead, the editorial disputes the experts conclusion. Also, the second boldface is not a conclusion.

C. This is the correct answer. The first boldface is indeed a finding or observation that is used to support the experts conclusion. The second is a premise that is used to support the experts conclusion.

D. The first boldface does not support the main conclusion - again the editorial rejects the experts conclusion. The second boldface is not a conclusion because it is preceded by a premise indicator "because."

E. The first boldface is not a conclusion. The second boldface does not support this conclusion.
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 192
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 6

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2012, 04:58
C it is..
Note that the main conclusion of this passage is that the editorial rejects the efficiency experts conclusion.
Cheers..!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 306
Followers: 539

Kudos [?]: 1024 [1] , given: 2

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2012, 18:45
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
For this question it is key to discern the difference between the argument (the efficiency expert's recommendation) and the editorial, which disagrees with the argument set forth by the efficiency expert.

The argument is that the watch commander is superfluous because he/she approves almost all of the provisional arrests.

The bold-faced parts are as follows:

1) almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce.

2) the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted

Conclusion of expert: the watch commander's approval is no longe required.

Conclusion of editorial: the expert is wrong because without a watch commander's approval standards will become more lax.

The first point is a premise that helps efficiency expert draw his/her conclusion. The second point, however, is not the conclusion, but instead also undergirds the expert's conclusion: if the officers' time is wasted, then his/her role should be discontinued.

We will see this recapitulated in the language of (C):

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial
opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was
used to support the proposal. ANSWER

(D) is incorrect because it says that 1) is used to support the editorial's conclusion. However 1) is used to support the efficiency expert's conclusion.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6924 [2] , given: 1051

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2012, 02:50
2
KUDOS
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial.

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation.

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.
_________________

Last edited by carcass on 03 Nov 2012, 11:49, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 568 [0], given: 23

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2012, 03:05
carcass wrote:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial.

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation.

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.

What is the OA?

Basically in this passage, there is a fact, probably with support of some data, that all provisional arrests meet the standards. This fact however has been used in stating an effect of this fact,and to recommend something that author opposes.
Ans C clearly defines role of each bold face as per this understanding.

Hence Ans C it is.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6924 [0], given: 1051

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2012, 03:49
Waiting other responses.

This was difficult, I would like to see more post from novices than from experts
_________________

Last edited by carcass on 04 Nov 2012, 04:26, edited 2 times in total.
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 568 [0], given: 23

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2012, 04:02
carcass wrote:
Waiting other responses.

This was difficult, I would like to see more post from novices than from experts

And I consider myself a novice, thus u got the post u were looking for
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6924 [0], given: 1051

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2012, 11:49
ya right :D novice.............

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 405
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 82

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2012, 04:20
Yup C it is..second bf is not conclusion..!!..Choice A B D gone..!!

E..first is not conclusion..its finding..which is mentioned in C..therefor correct

carcass wrote:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial. (first is not a claim, second is not conclusion)..wrong..

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation.(First is not obersvation, again like A..Second is not conclusion)

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.(correct, first is a finding that was used to support..second is judgement and suprtng the puposal..agreed..!!)

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.

_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 198
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 22

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2012, 23:30
There was a recommendation to remove watch commanders approval when a provisional arrest is made. The editorial rejects the said recommendation stating it as dangerous.

First Bold face statement: almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce
It is supporting the proposal made ie it is supporting the proposal of removing the watch commanders approval process.
But this proposal is being opposed by the editorial.

Second bold face statement : the officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
The proposal to remove the wathc commanders approval process when a provisional arrest is made actually judges that the officers time is wasted in the process of getting an approval from watch commander. Hence, this is a judgement passed by the proposal but the same proposal is being opposed by the editorial.

Choice C fits the bill perfectly.

Hope this helps
Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional   [#permalink] 07 Nov 2012, 23:30

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 55 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is 0 26 Mar 2013, 08:51
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is 0 28 Mar 2012, 18:45
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is 0 30 Sep 2008, 11:09
16 The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown 29 07 Sep 2008, 07:53
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown 7 09 May 2008, 19:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by