It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 06:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 05:26
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial. No dispute

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation. No dispute

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.
Second is not the conclusion. I have highlighted the conclusion in Green

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.First is not the conclusion. I have highlighted the conclusion in Green
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 75

Manager
Status: Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 92

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 18

Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2013, 08:35
Not sure how 1st BF is a finding, as the passage clearly states that
Quote:
A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
.

So 1st BF must be an Observation as Findings are more rigorous and must be appropriately tested using tightly controlled variables.
Although I must admit that the 2nd BF is not really a conclusion but Choice B is the best.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sanjoo wrote:
Yup C it is..second bf is not conclusion..!!..Choice A B D gone..!!

E..first is not conclusion..its finding..which is mentioned in C..therefor correct

carcass wrote:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial. (first is not a claim, second is not conclusion)..wrong..

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation.(First is not obersvation, again like A..Second is not conclusion)

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.(correct, first is a finding that was used to support..second is judgement and suprtng the puposal..agreed..!!)

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.

_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 333

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 4

Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2013, 08:51
Hi Prasun,

I think that you're mistaken on the first BF passage. Just because it says 'observed' doesn't mean it's simply an observation.

For example 'Darwin observed over a number of years evidence that supported Natural Selection' - you would call this a 'finding' that he had observed lots of evidence.

As you rightly say the 2nd BF is definitely not the overall conclusion, so this alone should put you off B.

C is the official answer and is correct.
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0

... and more

Last edited by Narenn on 05 Oct 2013, 13:23, edited 1 time in total.
All similar threads have been merged.

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2013, 03:09
Why are you guys posting answers to a different question??? The answer to the first question in the thread is C. and it is the OA.

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 57

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2013, 21:23
I agree with answer C but can someone help me in understanding the stem completely...

Police officers make an arrest which is considered as provisional until he takes that person to the station where the station commander checks if the evidence is sufficient.....
Govt expert says that since whatever standards commander enforces are met by the arrests this commander assessing of sufficiency of evidence should be taken away.....
The editorial rejects this recommendation and introduces a counter premise 'however'...... so this line should talk against the conclusion right.... so even though there is no assurance that the commander does a quality job, editorial still enforces this check step to be needed.... so what do they mean by "once approval is no longer required"? If this check step or approval is not needed/eliminated as per govt expert, commander would no longer be in the scene.... It is taken for granted that police officers make a good job in arresting people.... Shouldn't the last line be "This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once this proposal is struck down"

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 57

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 24

Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2014, 11:46
Amateur wrote:
I agree with answer C but can someone help me in understanding the stem completely...

Police officers make an arrest which is considered as provisional until he takes that person to the station where the station commander checks if the evidence is sufficient.....
Govt expert says that since whatever standards commander enforces are met by the arrests this commander assessing of sufficiency of evidence should be taken away.....
The editorial rejects this recommendation and introduces a counter premise 'however'...... so this line should talk against the conclusion right.... so even though there is no assurance that the commander does a quality job, editorial still enforces this check step to be needed.... so what do they mean by "once approval is no longer required"? If this check step or approval is not needed/eliminated as per govt expert, commander would no longer be in the scene.... It is taken for granted that police officers make a good job in arresting people.... Shouldn't the last line be "This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once this proposal is struck down"

It means police officers would not strictly adhere to commanders' standards as they would do when approvals are required and hence there is a possibility that innocent get arrested for no proper evidence.

Hope it helps.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 24

Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2014, 20:33
Analyzing the passage itself, the first boldfaced part is something that somebody observed. It is not disputed, but seems to be taken as fact; it is what is happening now.
The second boldfaced part uses the first boldfaced part to draw a conclusion about the situation at hand. Because the provisional arrests mostly have the proper evidence, therefore, the officers are wasting their time waiting for an approval that will most likely come.

NOTE: The boldfaced sections in the initial question above are different than the requoted boldfaced sections in some of the subsequent replies, which is likely why so many people have the wrong answer of B.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2014, 20:33
Analyzing the passage itself, the first boldfaced part is something that somebody observed. It is not disputed, but seems to be taken as fact; it is what is happening now.
The second boldfaced part uses the first boldfaced part to draw a conclusion about the situation at hand. Because the provisional arrests mostly have the proper evidence, therefore, the officers are wasting their time waiting for an approval that will most likely come.

NOTE: The boldfaced sections in the initial question above are different than the requoted boldfaced sections in some of the subsequent replies, which is likely why so many people have the wrong answer of B.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 82

Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 4
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2014, 19:16
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
(D) The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion.
(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.

First boldface is clearly an observation as mentioned in boldface sentence itself. Second boldface is starting with “because” (premise marker keyword) that means it is a premise not the conclusion.
So we are looking for Observation(I) + premise(II). Clearly we can rule out choices A, B, D and E. So C is the answer.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 82

Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 115

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 183

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2014, 07:09

Both bold portion are not the conclusion ,Therefore we can eliminate choices A,B,D,E

After elimination only option C remains.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 183

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 529

Kudos [?]: 649 [0], given: 606

Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2014, 21:45
Just FYI. There r two conclusion in the arg.
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted,
[Expert's cnclusion]the watch commander's approval no longer be
required.

[Editor's conclusion]This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
[why?]since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Kudos [?]: 649 [0], given: 606

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2016, 08:46
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1393

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2016, 21:45
bold face question require us to realize the role of 2 phrases. this require a good reading of non native. non native who have not read well in english course meet difficulty doing this question type.

normally there are two conclusion in bold face question. main conclution and a conclustion authou counter. our first job is to realize 2 conclusions. after this job, we can go to answer choice easlily.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2015
Posts: 111

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 136

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2016, 18:37
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial. - the first boldfaced part is a premise, not a claim, and it is not disputed. INCORRECT
(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation. - the first boldfaced part is a premise (or observation) BUT it is not disputed. INCORRECT
(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal. - possible contender but confusing wording. HOLD FOR NOW
(D) The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion. - the first does not support the main conclusion, the first merely is a premise saying the system is working. the second is also not the main conclusion. INCORRECT
(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.[/quote] - the first is not a conclusion. INCORRECT

To correctly answer the question, we have to look for answers that comment on BOTH boldface statements correctly. The main conclusion is that they should not get rid of the watch commander's approval. Although C is a confusing answer, its the only one that isn't wrong. Got this one right by POE

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 136

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 109

GPA: 3.92
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2016, 13:31
The finding is not being disputed; the action based on the finding is being disputed. This is why B is incorrect and C is correct.

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 109

Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2017, 02:15
For me the answer is B. Is the OA c? Can some expert explain this please

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr   [#permalink] 16 Oct 2017, 02:15

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 56 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by