Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 03:48

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jun 2005, 17:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

13. Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to reform the electoral process, the president clearly acted in the best interests of the nation. Anyone who thinks otherwise should remember that the president made this decision knowing it would be met with fierce opposition at home and widespread disapproval abroad. All citizens who place the nationâ€™s well-being above narrow partisan interests will applaud this courageous action.

The reasoning in the editorial is in error because

(A) it confused a quality that is merely desirable in a political leader with a quality that is essential to effective political decision-making
(B) it fails to distinguish between evidence concerning the courage required to make a certain decision and evidence concerning the wisdom of making that decision
(C) it ignores the likelihood that many citizens have no narrow partisan interest in the proposed election reform plan
(D) it overlooks the possibility that there was strong opposition to the parliamentâ€™s plan among members of the presidentâ€™s own party
(E) it depends on the unwarranted assumption that any plan proposed by a parliament will necessarily serve only narrow partisan interests
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 08:22
(E). Narrow partisan interests, is awkwardly linked with parliament proposals.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 12

Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 08:31
E it is.

GA
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 165
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 21:10
"E"
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5045
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 22:39
The arugments states "All citizens who place the nationâ€™s well-being above narrow partisan interests will applaud this courageous action.". This is true only if any plans proposed by the parliament serves only narrow partisan interests.

E it is.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

10 Jun 2005, 18:46
Doesn't B fit in as well though?

what is the OA?
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Presidental decision [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 06:37
WinWinMBA wrote:
13. Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to reform the electoral process, the president clearly acted in the best interests of the nation. Anyone who thinks otherwise should remember that the president made this decision knowing it would be met with fierce opposition at home and widespread disapproval abroad. All citizens who place the nationâ€™s well-being above narrow partisan interests will applaud this courageous action.

The reasoning in the editorial is in error because

(A) it confused a quality that is merely desirable in a political leader with a quality that is essential to effective political decision-making
(B) it fails to distinguish between evidence concerning the courage required to make a certain decision and evidence concerning the wisdom of making that decision
(C) it ignores the likelihood that many citizens have no narrow partisan interest in the proposed election reform plan
(D) it overlooks the possibility that there was strong opposition to the parliamentâ€™s plan among members of the presidentâ€™s own party
(E) it depends on the unwarranted assumption that any plan proposed by a parliament will necessarily serve only narrow partisan interests

B it is.

First of all, the reason why it can't be E is that the statment "any plan proposed by a parliament will necessarily" goes way beyond the scope of the argument in question. We don't have any knowledge on other proposed plans by the parliament.

On the other hand, B clearly identifies the flaw in the statement that just because the President made the decision based on fierce opposition at home and abroad does not mean that he made a wise decision.
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 08:16
The OA is B.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities 5 17 Jul 2010, 11:04
The government has proposed a plan requiring young people to 8 06 Jun 2009, 13:13
Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, 11 25 May 2008, 07:46
Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, 12 13 Jan 2008, 09:07
Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, 7 03 Sep 2007, 08:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.