Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 25 May 2017, 10:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: The premier s economic advisor assures her that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 282
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 850 [2] , given: 23

Premium Member
Editorial: The premier s economic advisor assures her that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 12:10
2
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (02:25) correct 19% (01:28) wrong based on 178 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial: The premier’s economic advisor assures her that with the elimination of wasteful
spending the goal of reducing taxes while not significantly decreasing government services
can be met. But the premier should not listen to this advisor, who in his youth was convicted
of embezzlement. Surely his economic advice is as untrustworthy as he is himself, and so the
premier should discard any hope of reducing taxes without a significant decrease in
government services. Which one of the following is a questionable argumentative strategy
employed in the editorial’s argument?
a) rejecting a proposal on the grounds that a particular implementation of the proposal is likely
to fail
b) trying to win support for a proposal by playing on people’s fears of what could happen
otherwise
c) criticizing the source of a claim rather than examining the claim itself
d) taking a lack of evidence for a claim as evidence undermining the claim
e) presupposing what it sets out to establish


Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 63
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 3

Re: CR - Flaw in Argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2012, 17:25
Can some one explain the answers.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 556

Kudos [?]: 1070 [1] , given: 2

Re: CR - Flaw in Argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2012, 18:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The editorial maintains that the premier should not trust the economic advisor based on the economic advisor's prior unseemliness. What the editorial does not do is address what is wrong with the economic advisor's plan (this is a classic ad hominem - or attack the man - fallacy). Only (C) captures this fallacy.

a) rejecting a proposal on the grounds that a particular implementation of the proposal is likely
to fail

The editorial does not address the proposal itself.

b) trying to win support for a proposal by playing on people’s fears of what could happen
otherwise

Does not talk about people's fears.

c) criticizing the source of a claim rather than examining the claim itself

Answer.

d) taking a lack of evidence for a claim as evidence undermining the claim

Again, the editorial does not address the advisor's plan, and thus it never mentions a lack of evidence of that plan.

e) presupposing what it sets out to establish

The editorial does not presuppose that the proposal is not valid. It simply attacks the advisor's past record.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Re: CR - Flaw in Argument   [#permalink] 27 Jul 2012, 18:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring manufacturers WaterFlowsUp 3 27 Mar 2017, 08:35
Investment Advisor: It is well-known that investing in mun23 0 13 Apr 2013, 19:40
Investment Advisor: It is well-known that investing in manalq8 0 13 Apr 2013, 19:40
Vasquez-Morrell Assurance specializes in insuring singalong 15 25 Aug 2014, 09:30
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Investment Advisor: It is well-known that investing in IEsailor 23 13 Apr 2017, 23:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: The premier s economic advisor assures her that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.