Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 12:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 12:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [2]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2017
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Expert Reply
amoljain wrote:
Can anyone explain who does 'her' refer to in the highlighted portion of the question? The only person it can refer back to is Susan Huntington Dickinson, but that does not make sense.

Curious to know why you say so Amol.

her can also refer to Emily Dickinson’s (both possessive, though this doesn't matter too much).
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2020
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
ywilfred wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


Comma + which : LINK 1 & LINK 2 & LINK 3

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1998/12/13/268003.html?pageNumber=146
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/13/books/two-belles-of-amherst.html

Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else. After an examination of these cryptic messages, Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith have emerged up in arms for Susan. In compiling ''Open Me Carefully'' (which includes more than 20 poems and one letter not previously connected to Susan), they aim to show that the women enjoyed a long, close relationship, one whose workaday exchange of ''letter-poems'' (Susan's term) contributed to ''the texture of their daily life.'' Even more urgent, however, is their intent to champion Susan as Dickinson's ''primary reader'' -- the person they believe exerted the most significant, sustaining influence on Dickinson's poetic and erotic sensibility.


Hi everyone. Recently, I have been very confused with comma + ing modifiers. There are different rules written at different places. Can you lay down some basic concrete rules?
1. The subject should directly/indirectly agree with ing modifier
2. The ing modifier should show immediate result of the action or should modify the action.
Are these rules correct? or is there more to add?
AndrewN IanStewart DmitryFarber GMATNinja
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6859 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
pk6969 wrote:
Hi everyone. Recently, I have been very confused with comma + ing modifiers. There are different rules written at different places. Can you lay down some basic concrete rules?
1. The subject should directly/indirectly agree with ing modifier
2. The ing modifier should show immediate result of the action or should modify the action.
Are these rules correct? or is there more to add?
AndrewN IanStewart DmitryFarber GMATNinja

Hello, pk6969. You probably know that I am not a big fan of expounding on rules (or so-called rules). I like to work on a case-by-case basis with whatever a question provides for me to consider—i.e. within a small set of five answer choices. Even so, I do not mind pointing others to Expert advice: try this post by e-GMAT. Perhaps it will clarify the matter for you.

Happy reading.

- Andrew
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2021
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: IIMB EPGP'23
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
This Q is FAAD !!!! Though I am thankful to all the experts here, I am still not clear on the usage of "which" in E.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [0]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Expert Reply
bansalgaurav wrote:
This Q is FAAD !!!! Though I am thankful to all the experts here, I am still not clear on the usage of "which" in E.

Hi bansalgaurav,

Which is a relative pronoun here. It refers to (and provides information about) the entire noun phrase before it.

1. Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written...

Is there something specific about this which that you think is a little off?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 150
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Schools: Ivey '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Option A Vs E

Comma + ing modifiers do either of the three things mentioned below

1) They represent cause and effect relationship
2) They show the How aspect of the previous clause
3) They are logical extension/ general description of the form in which modifier participle phrase will have simultaneous with but subordinate to action with main Verb of the clause. (Will explain further)

Lets look at Option A with three usage as stated:

1) Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 *and as a result Dickson's letters outnumbered her letters to anyone else*???? It makes no sense. Dickson's letter written over a period from A to B doesn't give any so called CAUSE relationship for the Effect of OUTNUMBERING.

2) Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 HOW?*by outnumbering her letters to anyone else* It is clearly absurd

3) Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson *were written* and *outnumbering* .Outnumbering is not simultaneous with and subordinating to action of Written. Cannot be the logical extension. A common example to show this relationship is: Sun rose early, shinning brilliantly across the sky. Shinning is a simultaneous and subordinating action of rising ( THE MAIN VERB).Another eg: Amy skipped the school, giving the excuse of stomach ache. Giving the excuse is a simultaneous BUT Subordinating action of MAIN Verb Skipping the school.

For all the reasons above option A is wrong and E is our winner.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
ywilfred wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


Comma + which : LINK 1 & LINK 2 & LINK 3

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1998/12/13/268003.html?pageNumber=146
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/13/books/two-belles-of-amherst.html

Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else. After an examination of these cryptic messages, Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith have emerged up in arms for Susan. In compiling ''Open Me Carefully'' (which includes more than 20 poems and one letter not previously connected to Susan), they aim to show that the women enjoyed a long, close relationship, one whose workaday exchange of ''letter-poems'' (Susan's term) contributed to ''the texture of their daily life.'' Even more urgent, however, is their intent to champion Susan as Dickinson's ''primary reader'' -- the person they believe exerted the most significant, sustaining influence on Dickinson's poetic and erotic sensibility.


Process:

1. Scan the answers - identify the potential issue: modification (Mod.) and parallelism (//m)
2. Write down the 5 lines
3. Write down SVO
4. Read the sentence
5. Identify the SVO: S-letters, V- outnumber, O- all other letters
6. Identify the //m issue: period starting and ending or period started and ended . . .
7. POE . . . you must have a reason why each option is wrong - NOT sounding right is not a good reason!!!

A. Not sure what's wrong here, keep it
B. //m - period that begins . . . and that ended - this is incorrect
C. //m - period beginning . . . and that ends - this is incorrect
D. //m - period beginning . . ., ending - why do we have a comma here? what are we modifying?
E. //m - period beginning and ending (tick).
8. Now check for //m with the subject: The letters written . . . ., outnumber (tick)
9. Compare with A: A has outnumbering . . . The letters were written in the past and they outnumber any other letters. Outnumbering implies we are still comparing these letters in the 1800s.

Would appreciate commentary on my approach PLEASE!?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2020
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: United Kingdom
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

In this sentence the parallelism between "beginning" and "ending" is correct.

The problem with this sentence is the use of the "COMMA + ING-MODIFIER": "outnumbering". This is a mistake because a "comma +ING-modifer" must modify the entire preceding clause and be in the same time frame than the main action.

The relation between the clause and the ING-modifier does not make sense and they are not in the same time frame. A) is WRONG.


(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

This is a run-on sentence. There are two independent clauses (subject + verb) that are not linked by any means (not even a comma, which would still be wrong). B) is WRONG.



(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering


There are quite a few problems here, including the "and". The connector "and" implies a certain degree of independence between the 2 elements it separates. Therefore using "and outnumbering" in this sentence makes non sense. (+parallel issue by using "outnumbering"). C) is wrong.



(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

Some of the same problems as in C). D) is WRONG



(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

E) is our last option and it must be CORRECT as we eliminated all other choices.

Here, "which" is correct because it is separated from "letters" by a prep phrase. The "which" allows to fix our problem in B) as "which were written..." becomes a modifier of "letters".

"Outnumber" is the right verb form.





ywilfred wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


Comma + which : LINK 1 & LINK 2 & LINK 3

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1998/12/13/268003.html?pageNumber=146
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/13/books/two-belles-of-amherst.html

Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else. After an examination of these cryptic messages, Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith have emerged up in arms for Susan. In compiling ''Open Me Carefully'' (which includes more than 20 poems and one letter not previously connected to Susan), they aim to show that the women enjoyed a long, close relationship, one whose workaday exchange of ''letter-poems'' (Susan's term) contributed to ''the texture of their daily life.'' Even more urgent, however, is their intent to champion Susan as Dickinson's ''primary reader'' -- the person they believe exerted the most significant, sustaining influence on Dickinson's poetic and erotic sensibility.
[/quote]
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Status:Patience
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

This is a good case where the TOUCH rule of which extends a little further for the antecedent because of the prepositional phrase: letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson , which. One must remember if the prepositional phrase is absolutely necessary to modify the noun it may come in between which/that/who/when/those and the noun. Here to identify which set of letters are being talked about the prepositional phrase 'to Susan HD' is necessary.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering - Letter were written, outnumbering her letters to anyone else. This construction isnt the best as is it still in the act of outnumbering? I dont think so.

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber - That begins (simple present) is uncalled for as its not a universal fact that always happens.

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering - Parallelism error, trigger 'and'. 'that ends shortly' needs a 'that begins a few years' (but also remember its better to not keep it as a universal fact using simple present)

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering - In the which test (as the word before the ',' is part of a necessary prepositional phrase, we'll let it slide) its fine, not happy but fine. Letters were written ,and outnumbering her letters to others.

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber - Again which is fine here as its still modifying Letters (to SHD), the construction is similar to A but it corrects the tense to outnumber (which is now representation of a fact that has happened) SELECT E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Canada
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
what's the difference between "... , which" and ".... which"?

For example, in option E: with the comma in front of "which", “which” now modifies the subject of the first sentence - "Emily Disckinson's Letter". In the case when there's no comma before "which", does it modify "Susan Huntington Dickinson" ?

E. "Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else."
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5137 [1]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
kaomanfen wrote:
what's the difference between "... , which" and ".... which"?

For example, in option E: with the comma in front of "which", “which” now modifies the subject of the first sentence - "Emily Disckinson's Letter". In the case when there's no comma before "which", does it modify "Susan Huntington Dickinson" ?

E. "Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else."

Hi kaomanfen.

In American written English, there is always a comma before "which" unless "which" is preceded by a preposition, in an expression such as "from which" or "in which."

In British written English, sometimes "which" is not preceded by a comma, in a structure such as "the grass which grows in Kentucky." In such cases, "which" functions the way "that" does in American written English, referring to the previous noun or noun phrase.

So, regardless of whether there is a comma before "which," it still refers to the preceding noun or noun phrase. Thus, in this case, if there were no comma before "which," it would still refer to the noun phrase "Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson."
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 58
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 58
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
ywilfred wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else. After an examination of these cryptic messages, Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith have emerged up in arms for Susan. In compiling ''Open Me Carefully'' (which includes more than 20 poems and one letter not previously connected to Susan), they aim to show that the women enjoyed a long, close relationship, one whose workaday exchange of ''letter-poems'' (Susan's term) contributed to ''the texture of their daily life.'' Even more urgent, however, is their intent to champion Susan as Dickinson's ''primary reader'' -- the person they believe exerted the most significant, sustaining influence on Dickinson's poetic and erotic sensibility.[/spoiler]


@gmatninja- Isn't "Outnumbering" in choice A, modifying Emily's letters?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2022
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Retail Banking)
Send PM
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Quote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


When you see the time ticking on the timer, it creates a pressure to act quickly. I got this answer correct but I was not 100% sure of my choice. As I spent moe time with the question I understood what was going in my mind and why I got it correct.

My approach:
1) Read the sentence and comma + -ing stood out to me as cause-effect relationship or just a simple adverbial modifier along with parallelism between 'beginning' and 'ending'
2) Going through the options, I checked for the parallelism as it was easier to spot.

Quote:
(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

>> Parallelism - correct
>> comma + -ing as cause & effect relationship and as an adverbial modifier both are incorrect - eliminated :exclamation

Quote:
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

>> Parallelism - incorrect - eliminated :exclamation

Quote:
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

>> Parallelism - incorrect - eliminated :exclamation

Quote:
D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

>> Parallelism - incorrect!!! : beginning - ending - outnumbering do not serve the same purpose. 'Outnumbering' has to serve a different purpose and thus cannot be parallel - eliminated :exclamation


Quote:
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

>> Parallelism - correct
>> the description about the letters ( a clause that starts with 'which' and ends with '1886' is a non-essential clause so reading the whole sentence without the clause, Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else., the sentence makes perfect sense! :angel: :heart

Confidently marked (E) and moved to the next question

Originally posted by AADINAATH on 02 Oct 2022, 01:12.
Last edited by AADINAATH on 02 Oct 2022, 21:42, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Posts: 316
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
Send PM
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
Hello friends,

The statistics for this question reveal that there is great confusion as to why Choice E is the correct answer and why choice A is incorrect.

To figure out why Choice A is incorrect, let's first understand the meaning of this sentence. We will do so by breaking the sentence into smaller logical chunks so that we can deal with each chunk individually and assimilate the meaning as we read on. This approach is the most effective way to extract the meaning presented by the sentence.

Sentence Structure   



Meaning

The sentence says that Emily Dickinson (ED) wrote letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson (SHD) over a certain period. This period spans from a few years before SHD got married to ED's brother to ED's death in 1886.

Now, the last part of the sentence uses the comma + verb-ing modifier "outnumbering her letters…" which is an action modifier. This modifier can modify the preceding clause in one of the three ways:
    1. By presenting the "how" aspect of the modified clause.
    2. By presenting the "result" of the modified clause.
    3. By presenting information that supports the information presented by the preceding clause.

Now, let's assess the meaning we get by the usage of the comma + verb-ing modifier "outnumbering her letters…".
    1. Is it logical to say that ED wrote letters to SHD over a certain period by outnumbering or exceeding her letters to anyone else? No, this meaning is illogical.
    2. Is it logical to say that ED wrote letters to SHD over a certain period and, therefore, outnumbered or exceeded her letters to anyone else? No, this meaning is illogical too.
    3. Has the action of outnumbering/exceeding her letters to anyone else got anything to do with ED writing letters to SHD over a certain period? No, there is no logical connection between writing the letters over a certain period and these letters outnumbering ED's letters to anyone else.

So, the use of the comma + verbing modifier "outnumbering her letters…" makes the sentence incorrect because this modifier does not present logical meaning. Therefore, Choice A is incorrect.




Let's understand the application of the comma + verb-ing modifier through a few example sentences:

The film was shot in the small town of Guttenberg, exceeding the expectations of the producers.

The use of the comma + verb-ing modifier comma + exceeding… is incorrect in this sentence because this modifier illogically modifies the preceding clause. It does not make sense to say that because the film was shot in a small town, the film exceeded the expectations of the producers.


Let's study the next sentence:
The film, shot in the small town of Guttenberg, exceeded the expectations of the producers.

This sentence simply states the fact that this film exceeded the expectations. It also provides extra information about where the film was shot. These two pieces of information are independent of each other. So, this sentence is logical and grammatical.


Now let's look at this one:
The film received significant critical acclaim, exceeding the expectations of the producers.

This sentence is logical. In this sentence, the comma + verb-ing modifier exceeding… makes complete sense in modifying the preceding clause. The expectations of the producers were exceeded because the film received significant critical acclaim.


Resolution   

So, we understand that in this official question the action of ED's letters exceeding her letters to anyone else has got nothing to do with ED writing those letters to SHD over a certain period. These two actions are independent of each other. The correct answer, Choice E, presents this logical meaning. It correctly says that ED wrote letters to SHD over a certain period of time, and her letters to SHD outnumber or exceed ED's letters to anyone else.


Learning Resources   

The comma + verb-ing modifier concept can be problematic and often leave students confused. No worries, we have you covered with additional resources to help you master this concept in no time. We love our modifiers and are here to help you love them too!

1. Check out another hard official question that tests this same concept and will help solidify your understanding - Leafy Spurge.You can also see how we tackle this question in our Free SC Session. The Leafy Spurge question is covered at 1:32:10 in the video here.

2. Click on this link for the complete solution to ED's letters question on our blog.
Click on this link for the video solution:

3. Even better- the comma + verb-ing modifier concept is part of the e-GMAT free trial; click on the link below to access this fantastic content.

4. Finally, join the 500 others who have found help in our article on Verb-Ing Modifiers - Link


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha



egmat

I believe there is some mistake in the evaluation of option A :

As mentioned by you
Now, the last part of the sentence uses the comma + verb-ing modifier "outnumbering her letters…" which is an action modifier. [b]This modifier can modify the preceding clause in one of the three ways:
    1. By presenting the "how" aspect of the modified clause.
    2. By presenting the "result" of the modified clause.
    3. By presenting information that supports the information presented by the preceding clause.
[/b]

Now, let's assess the meaning we get by the usage of the comma + verb-ing modifier "outnumbering her letters…".
1. Is it logical to say that ED wrote letters to SHD over a certain period by outnumbering or exceeding her letters to anyone else? No, this meaning is illogical.
2. Is it logical to say that ED wrote letters to SHD over a certain period and, therefore, outnumbered or exceeded her letters to anyone else? No, this meaning is illogical too.
3. Has the action of outnumbering/exceeding her letters to anyone else got anything to do with ED writing letters to SHD over a certain period? No, there is no logical connection between writing the letters over a certain period and these letters outnumbering ED's letters to anyone else.

The subject of the sentence is not ED but the letter, so now is it logical to say that
Take instance 2 mentioned above - Is it logical to say that Letters to SHD over a certain period and, therefore, outnumbered or exceeded her letters to anyone else? No, this meaning is illogical too.


MartyTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun , any view of yours
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Posts: 316
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Usage of ing modifer

Ing modifier as adjectival modifier - modifies the preceding subject
Ing modifier as adverbial modifier - modifies the clause
Ing modifier - can be used to show cause effect

In Option A there is correct usage of ing modifier, letter (to SHD) outnumber her letters to anyone else.

I read a comment saying, the subject is very far from modifier then in that case
all the ing modifer used to modify the subject in the preceding clause will be wrong. Can someone please help me clear this concept
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5137 [0]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Rickooreo wrote:
Usage of ing modifer

Ing modifier as adjectival modifier - modifies the preceding subject
Ing modifier as adverbial modifier - modifies the clause
Ing modifier - can be used to show cause effect

In Option A there is correct usage of ing modifier, letter (to SHD) outnumber her letters to anyone else.

I read a comment saying, the subject is very far from modifier then in that case
all the ing modifer used to modify the subject in the preceding clause will be wrong. Can someone please help me clear this concept

The fact that the -ing modifier is relatively far from the subject of the sentence doesn't make the (A) version incorrect. What the modifier is meant to modify is clear. With regards to its basic structure, the (A) version of the sentence is fine.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne