It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 01:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1120

Kudos [?]: 2406 [3], given: 219

Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2013, 08:10
3
This post received
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed analysis on this one. Thanks!


Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

We can eliminate B because it uses "it" to refer back to "costs".

A- less than they did
C- less than they were
D- lower than
E- lower than they were


If we use "were", the sentence makes no sense:

Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in September, slightly less than they were in the year ...

We want to compare two rates; but this sentence compares a rate(costs rose up) to a static state (verb "to be": costs were)
Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in September, slightly less than they were(say 10,000$) in the year ...<== no sense comparison

C and E are out. D is not a complete comparison: "lower than (what?) in the year that ended ...". A is correct, and it compares how the costs rose (two growth rates):

Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did(=rose) in the year that ended in the previous quarter.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Kudos [?]: 2406 [3], given: 219

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1965

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2014, 12:00
imadkho wrote:
Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A- less than they did
B- less than it did
C- less than they were
D- lower than
E- lower than they were


Let's use some splits for this one

Rose up is redundant

Eliminate A,B,C,D and E

J/K but if this is indeed from GMAT prep...that's a nasty mistake there

Anways we need less not lower so D,E are out
Between A,B,C
Costs are plural so B is out
Were is wrong verb so C is out

A stands

Hope it helps
Cheers!
J :)

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 355

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Work hard in silence, let success make the noise
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 84

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 540 Q50 V15
GMAT 2: 640 Q50 V27
GPA: 3.11
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2014, 03:31
Are you sure the source of this question is GMAT Prep?
_________________

Sahil Chaudhary
If you find this post helpful, please take a moment to click on the "+1 KUDOS" icon.
My IELTS 7.5 Experience
From 540 to 640...Done with GMAT!!!
http://www.sahilchaudhary007.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 84

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 998 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2014, 16:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
ammuseeru wrote:
VerbalBot wrote:
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.



There is no OA for this question. Is it official GMAT question ?


I have added the OA.
Please remember ---Lower cannot be used with countable things.
Lower is used to compare numbers, rates, percentages,ranks, ideas ,uncountable nouns (amount of money in my bank account is lower than that in yours).etc

Here 'employment costs' is uncountable hence both less and lower could have worked but for using lower than we need some noun to follow the the comparison in the second part of the sentence...costs rose 2.8 percent lower than the percent for .. This isn't the case here. So we can drop D and E options.

Among A,B,C .
B is out since the plural costs does not agree with pronoun it
In option A and C --->Did vs Were .
A wins because we can't use were (option C) unless there was some other " to be"verb (was, were, am ,is ) to match/parallel it in the previous part of the sentence. Hence we use the action verb did (do)
Hope this helps.

For a more detailed discussion: http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/emp ... t6388.html
_________________

How to select your BSchool?
General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 998 [1], given: 321

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 998 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2014, 16:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
calvinhobbes wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Kudos to all! :)

One follow-up question: I thought percent is countable and should be used with lower rather than less?

Thanks


Any noun you can count ..say 1,2..10..100 is countable
1 boy, 10 points, 5% , 20 chocolates, -all countable

Rice,Sugar, joy, taxes, amount of money, heat --all uncountable

But when you say :
1 kg sugar, 15 1$ bills, 15 degree celsius temperature --then it becomes countable.

Please NOTE : you cannot use lower with countable things.
HTH
_________________

How to select your BSchool?
General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 998 [1], given: 321

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 23

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2015, 04:02
jjhko wrote:
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A. less than they did
B. less than it did
C. less than they were
D. lower than
E. lower than they were

Could someone also explain what the difference is between A and C?

Thank,
jjhko


Understand what is compared.
Do actions are compared or Do facts are compared?
Action of rising in one year is compared with action of rising in another year (previous year).
Hence we need ‘to do verb’ in the answer choice.

Only A & B has ‘to do verb’.
B makes pronoun agreement error (refers costs with it)
Hence, A is the correct choice.

As I always say - focus on meaning!

Cheers!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 23

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 25

Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2016, 18:31
If there were an answer "less than it had done", Could i consider it a more correct answer than the OA ??????

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 25

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 36

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2016, 05:26
thanhphong01 wrote:
If there were an answer "less than it had done", Could i consider it a more correct answer than the OA ??????



I think NO.
you can not consider "less than it had done" as a correct answer at all

Firstly, it is wrong. The Employment costs are plural. and it is singular pronoun

Secondly , Question stem says - Employment costs rose2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September
Now that you are going to apply ellipsis , the long predicate must be replaced by did or did so. It will only take helping verb when the First part contains a verb that is accompanied by a helping verb ("Had" in this instance")

Nevertheless this is the not primary here. "It" should not be used in this context.
_________________

The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 36

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3227

Kudos [?]: 3644 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2016, 02:48
thanhphong01 wrote:
If there were an answer "less than it had done", Could i consider it a more correct answer than the OA ??????


Tryambak's explanation above is nice. However I shall try to elaborate further on the topic:

You may use helping verbs later in a sentence to replace longer verbs or verb phrases used in the initial portion of the sentence.

Wordy: I have never played football, but he has played football.
Correct: I have never played football, but he has.

OR

Wordy: I never played football, but he played football.
Correct: I never played football, but he did.

Please note that in such cases both the instances of the verbs should generally have the same tense. The first example above uses past perfect..past perfect. The second uses simple past.. simple past.

Therefore "less than they had done" may not be a correct answer, and should be written as "less than they had risen".

Another subtle point to note:

Your observation that a past perfect is a better choice than a simple past (on the basis of that the previous action happened before the latter action) may not be correct - the rising in the year ended previous quarter did not happen exclusively before the year ended this September. To illustrate this scenario, please understand the following:

Year ended previous quarter: July, previous year----> June, this year (1st July, previous year to 30th June, this year)
Year ended this September: October,previous year ------> September, this year (1st October previous year to 30th September, this year)

There has been overlap of 9 months between the 2 periods compared - viz., October, previous year to June, this year (1st October, previous year to 30th June, this year). Therefore use of past perfect for the previous period is not correct.

Kudos [?]: 3644 [0], given: 22

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10203

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2016, 11:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1387

Kudos [?]: 172 [1], given: 916

Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2016, 00:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
danzig wrote:
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.
A, less than they did
B, less than it did
C, less than they were
D, lower than
E, lower than they were

What is wrong with D? What is the difference between "less" and "lower"? :s

Thanks!


D is wrong because
d mean "Lower than cost rose in the year". this is infered from elipsis.
cost rose 2 percent this year lower than costs rose that year. wrong, lower can not used to compare actions.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 172 [1], given: 916

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1848

Kudos [?]: 1071 [0], given: 90

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2017, 19:27
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

A. less than they did - Correct
B. less than it did - usage of it to refer to costs is incorrect
C. less than they were - parallelism issue
D. lower than - If you wanted to use "lower than" correctly, you would need a noun in the second part of the comparison (e.g. "2.8% is lower than the percent for last quarter). D has no noun in the second part of the comparison
E. lower than they were - (E) has "they" = costs, which is the wrong noun, in the second part of the comparison.

The only difference between (A) and (C) is the verb. Consider parallelism with the other verbs that share the subject.

(A) Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in ..., slightly less than they (employment costs) did in ...
(C) Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in ..., slightly less than they (employment costs) were in ...

The active verb "rose" parallels the active "did." There's a name for this: proform. Basically, "did" replaces "rose" in much the same way that a pronoun might replace a noun. It is understood that "did" = "rose."
Answer A
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 1071 [0], given: 90

Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that   [#permalink] 29 Nov 2017, 19:27

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.