Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 01:49 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 01:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618671 [7]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 1998
Own Kudos [?]: 1611 [1]
Given Kudos: 1679
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2015
Status:Learning!
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [0]
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 580 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V33
Send PM
Re: Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Though that one pound of meat is more nutritious, the sixteen pounds of grain will be able to fill up more stomachs. Hence in the long term, it will be morally incorrect to consume meat.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the ethicist's argument?


Conclusion: "in the long term, it will be morally incorrect to consume meat."

A. Even though it has been established that a vegetarian diet can be healthy, many people prefer to eat meat and are willing to pay for it. - Out of scope
B. Often, cattle or sheep can be raised to maturity on grass from pastureland that is unsuitable for any other kind of farming. - Out of scope
C. If a grain diet is consumed with protein derived from non-animal sources, it can have nutritional value which is equal to that of a diet containing meat. - Out of scope
D. Although prime farmland near metropolitan areas is being lost rapidly to suburban development, we could reverse this trend by choosing to live in areas that are already urban. - Irrelevant
E. Nutritionists agree that a diet composed solely of grain products is not adequate for human health. - :thumbsup: :thumbsup: A somewhat plausible reason to stick to meat !
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2021
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 220 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen [#permalink]
C: Consuming meat is morally incorrect.
E: 16 pounds of grain could fed more people than 1 pound of meat.
LJ: Just feeding fewer people, does it mean morally incorrect?
In other words, are grains and meat actually substitutes?

A. people are willing to pay to eat meat (does not strengthen/weaken morality)
B. Cattle can be raised in grassland unsuitable for farming (but they still need to be fed by grains right?, do nothing to argument)
C. nutritional value (does not strengthen/weaken morality)
D. living in urban area (does not strengthen/weaken morality)
E. diet solely composed of grains is not adequate for health (yes, they are not substitutes, and we need meat anyways despite the fact that meat could feed less people)

I choose E.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [0]
Given Kudos: 316
Send PM
Re: Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen [#permalink]
winterschool wrote:
Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Though that one pound of meat is more nutritious, the sixteen pounds of grain will be able to fill up more stomachs. Hence in the long term, it will be morally incorrect to consume meat.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the ethicist's argument?


A. Even though it has been established that a vegetarian diet can be healthy, many people prefer to eat meat and are willing to pay for it. Incorrect

additional info

B. Often, cattle or sheep can be raised to maturity on grass from pastureland that is unsuitable for any other kind of farming. Correct

it weakens conclusion, meat produced animals raised in pastureland, so grain production cant be affected by meat consume

C. If a grain diet is consumed with protein derived from non-animal sources, it can have nutritional value which is equal to that of a diet containing meat. Incorrect

additional info

D. Although prime farmland near metropolitan areas is being lost rapidly to suburban development, we could reverse this trend by choosing to live in areas that are already urban. Incorrect

Irrelevant

E. Nutritionists agree that a diet composed solely of grain products is not adequate for human health. Incorrect

this cant weakens conclusion that meat consume is morally wrong

I think answer B


Wow. amazing explanation. thank you.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2020
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 78
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
Send PM
Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen [#permalink]
Conclusion: Filling less stomachs = Morally incorrect
Assumption:
Those extra pounds of grain that the animal eats would feed people otherwise.
A weakener should attack the assumption.

A. Even though it has been established that a vegetarian diet can be healthy, many people prefer to eat meat and are willing to pay for it.
Even if many people prefer non-veg, it would be morally incorrect for people who don't
B. Often, cattle or sheep can be raised to maturity on grass from pastureland that is unsuitable for any other kind of farming
Attacking the assumption by stating that those extra pounds that an animal feeds on is inedible anyway
C. If a grain diet is consumed with protein derived from non-animal sources, it can have nutritional value which is equal to that of a diet containing meat.
Nutritional value has no bearing on the conclusion
D. Although prime farmland near metropolitan areas is being lost rapidly to suburban development, we could reverse this trend by choosing to live in areas that are already urban.
Out of scope
E. Nutritionists agree that a diet composed solely of grain products is not adequate for human health.
Tricky choice! While that may be true about adequacy, it is not equivalent to filling MORE stomachs
GMAT Club Bot
Ethicist: The herbivorous animals need to be fed with atleast sixteen [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne