GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jan 2019, 20:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

# Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 842
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2015, 02:35
4
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (02:16) correct 29% (02:04) wrong based on 90 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greatest paycheck incurs a thirty five percent income tax, while the other two paychecks incur twenty five percent income tax each. Is the total amount of tax deducted from the three paychecks greater than thirty percent of the total of the paychecks before tax deduction?

(1) Harriet's biggest salary is \$4000, and the next largest salary is \$1500.

(2) Harriet's smallest salary is \$1000.
Stat.(1): The second largest check is \$1500, so the third largest check can be anywhere between zero and \$1500. Plug in the extremes: if the third check is the maximum \$1500, then Harriet's salary is \$4000+\$1500+\$1500=\$7000. 30% of \$7000 is \$2100 (3 "10%" blocks of \$700), so the question is now: is the tax greater than \$2100?

Big check tax: 35% of \$4000 = \$1400 (3.5 × 10% blocks of \$400)

Second and third check tax: 25% of (\$1500+\$1500) = 25%×3000 = \$750

Total tax of \$1400+\$750 = \$2150 , which is more than \$2100, so the answer to the question stem is "yes".

Is it always "yes"? test it by plugging in the other extreme: what if you plug in zero dollars for the smallest check (or \$1, close to zero)? The result is still greater than 30%:

Total salary = \$4000+\$1500+\$0 = \$5500

30% tax target = 30% × \$5500 = \$1650

Tax for large check = \$1400

Tax for next largest check = \$375.

Total tax: \$1400+\$375 = \$1775, which is still greater than \$1650, the 30% target.

Stat. (2): since now there's no upper limit to the value of the largest and second-largest checks, you can obviously find an example where the tax is greater than 30%: plug in \$1001 for the second check and \$1,000,000 for the largest salary, so that the smaller checks are negligible. In this case, the tax will be very close to 35% of the total tax, and will definitely be greater than 30%. So the answer to the question stem is "yes", but is it always "yes"? plug in the other extreme, with a minimum difference between the paychecks. For example,

small paycheck=\$1000, medium check = \$1001, large check = \$1002. You can even ballpark all three checks at \$1000 each.

Now the total salary is \$1000+\$1000+\$1000 = \$3000

Tax target of 30% = 30%×\$3000 = \$900

Tax for largest check: 35%×1000 = \$350

Tax for medium and smaller check = 25%×(\$1000+\$1000) = \$250+\$250 = \$500.

Total tax = \$500+\$350 = \$850, which is not greater than \$900, giving an answer of "no".

Thus, there's no single answer, and Stat.(2)->Maybe->IS->A.

Alternative method:

Translate the question into percent language and try to simplify it: if Harriet has three salaries, x, y, and z, where x is the largest, the tax she pays can be translated to 0.35·x (35% of the largest), 0.25·y and 0.25·z (25% of the other two). Thirty percent of her total salary can be written as 0.3(x+y+z). Now the question is

Is 0.35·x+0.25·y+0.25·z > 0.3(x+y+z) ?

which can be reduced to

Is 0.05·x > 0.05·y+0.05·z ?

and further reduced to the final question:

Is x > y+z ?

Now test the answer choices according to this inequality: (1) provide a definite answer, but (2) does not. Thus, the answer is A.

_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Re: Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2015, 22:00
2
This problem can be solved quickly, and the trap answer noticed easily, by spending a little time on the question stem. A mistake that rookie test takers often make on data sufficiency is thinking that all of the value lies in the statements, and as a result not spending enough time on the question stem. Here we learn that she receives 3 pay checks each month, the lowest 2 each with a 25% tax rate and the highest a 35% tax rate. In order to know whether the overall tax rate ends up being higher or lower than 30%, we simply need to know whether the two lower checks together are worth more than the highest pay check or vice versa, or if they are even. It's a simple weighted average question.

Statement 1 gives us everything that we need to know, because if the highest pay check is worth \$4,000, and the second highest is worth \$1,500, then at most the third pay check is worth \$1,500 also. That would mean that at most the two lowest pay checks are worth \$3k, while the highest is \$4k, and therefore the highest is definitely larger and we can conclude that indeed the tax rate is over 30%.

Statement 2 here presents us with our obvious trap, the C trap. This is likely to be fallen into by test takers who rushed to the statements without spending a little reflection time on the question stem.

Therefore the correct answer is A and the trap answer is C.

I hope this helps!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Save \$100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Posts: 23
Re: Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2017, 23:01
1
reto wrote:
Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greatest paycheck incurs a thirty five percent income tax, while the other two paychecks incur twenty five percent income tax each. Is the total amount of tax deducted from the three paychecks greater than thirty percent of the total of the paychecks before tax deduction?

(1) Harriet's biggest salary is \$4000, and the next largest salary is \$1500.

(2) Harriet's smallest salary is \$1000.
Stat.(1): The second largest check is \$1500, so the third largest check can be anywhere between zero and \$1500. Plug in the extremes: if the third check is the maximum \$1500, then Harriet's salary is \$4000+\$1500+\$1500=\$7000. 30% of \$7000 is \$2100 (3 "10%" blocks of \$700), so the question is now: is the tax greater than \$2100?

Big check tax: 35% of \$4000 = \$1400 (3.5 × 10% blocks of \$400)

Second and third check tax: 25% of (\$1500+\$1500) = 25%×3000 = \$750

Total tax of \$1400+\$750 = \$2150 , which is more than \$2100, so the answer to the question stem is "yes".

Is it always "yes"? test it by plugging in the other extreme: what if you plug in zero dollars for the smallest check (or \$1, close to zero)? The result is still greater than 30%:

Total salary = \$4000+\$1500+\$0 = \$5500

30% tax target = 30% × \$5500 = \$1650

Tax for large check = \$1400

Tax for next largest check = \$375.

Total tax: \$1400+\$375 = \$1775, which is still greater than \$1650, the 30% target.

Stat. (2): since now there's no upper limit to the value of the largest and second-largest checks, you can obviously find an example where the tax is greater than 30%: plug in \$1001 for the second check and \$1,000,000 for the largest salary, so that the smaller checks are negligible. In this case, the tax will be very close to 35% of the total tax, and will definitely be greater than 30%. So the answer to the question stem is "yes", but is it always "yes"? plug in the other extreme, with a minimum difference between the paychecks. For example,

small paycheck=\$1000, medium check = \$1001, large check = \$1002. You can even ballpark all three checks at \$1000 each.

Now the total salary is \$1000+\$1000+\$1000 = \$3000

Tax target of 30% = 30%×\$3000 = \$900

Tax for largest check: 35%×1000 = \$350

Tax for medium and smaller check = 25%×(\$1000+\$1000) = \$250+\$250 = \$500.

Total tax = \$500+\$350 = \$850, which is not greater than \$900, giving an answer of "no".

Thus, there's no single answer, and Stat.(2)->Maybe->IS->A.

Alternative method:

Translate the question into percent language and try to simplify it: if Harriet has three salaries, x, y, and z, where x is the largest, the tax she pays can be translated to 0.35·x (35% of the largest), 0.25·y and 0.25·z (25% of the other two). Thirty percent of her total salary can be written as 0.3(x+y+z). Now the question is

Is 0.35·x+0.25·y+0.25·z > 0.3(x+y+z) ?

which can be reduced to

Is 0.05·x > 0.05·y+0.05·z ?

and further reduced to the final question:

Is x > y+z ?

Now test the answer choices according to this inequality: (1) provide a definite answer, but (2) does not. Thus, the answer is A.

Let the salaries be a,b,c (a>b>c)
As per the question,
0.35a+0.25(b+c)>0.30(a+b+c)
simplifying this, the question becomes, is a>b+c ?

As per statement 1, a=4,000 and b=1,500. So even if b=c, 4000>3000. So the answer is YES. Sufficient.

Statement 2: Clearly insuffcient.
Director
Status: Come! Fall in Love with Learning!
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 533
Location: India
Re: Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2017, 04:12
let the salaries be a,b,c where a>b>c.
tax = 0.35a +0.2b +0.2c

St 1: a =4000, b = 1500
tax = 0.35*4000 +0.2*1500 +0.2*c = 1700 +0.2c.
c can range from 0 to 1500 and tax will be 1700 to 2100 for the total salary 5500 to 7000. therefore the percentage will lie in the range of 2100/7000 x 100 to 30% to 1700/5500 x 100 = 31%, which is definitely greater or equal to 30%. ANSWER

St 2: c =1000. nothing can be concluded as we have no idea about a and b. INSUFFICIENT

Option A
_________________

GMAT Mentors

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 262
Location: India
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2017, 21:14
we know that 2nd largest paycheck is 1500 so the 3rd could be anything between 1 to 1500 and can also be 1500 too.
so in all cases the tax amount will be greater than 30% of these there paychecks . so sufficient
Re: Every month, Harriet draws three paychecks from three jobs. The greate &nbs [#permalink] 08 Mar 2017, 21:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by