Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 00:11 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 00:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92887
Own Kudos [?]: 618656 [6]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92887
Own Kudos [?]: 618656 [0]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
General Discussion
Tutor
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [2]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [0]
Given Kudos: 254
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE:Consulting (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed uns [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed unsolicited letters from listeners who were expressing comments on the station’s programs. One week, the station received 50 letters with favorable comments about the station’s news reporting and music selection and 10 letters with unfavorable comments on the station’s new movie review segment of the evening program. Faced with this information, the programming director assumed that if some listeners did not like the movie review segment, then there must be other listeners who did like it. Therefore, he decided to continue the movie review segment of the evening program.

Which one of the following identifies a problem with the programming director’s decision process?


(A) He failed to recognize that people are more likely to write letters of criticism than of praise.

(B) He could not properly infer from the fact that some listeners did not like the movie review segment that some others did.

(C) He failed to take into consideration the discrepancy in numbers between favorable and unfavorable letters received.

(D) He failed to take into account the relation existing between the movie review segment and the news.

(E) He did not wait until he received at least 50 letters with unfavorable comments about the movie review segment before making his decision.


Hi AndrewN VeritasKarishma, can you please help me understand the meaning of option B.Appreciate your time and response on this one.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6856 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed uns [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
RohitSaluja wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed unsolicited letters from listeners who were expressing comments on the station’s programs. One week, the station received 50 letters with favorable comments about the station’s news reporting and music selection and 10 letters with unfavorable comments on the station’s new movie review segment of the evening program. Faced with this information, the programming director assumed that if some listeners did not like the movie review segment, then there must be other listeners who did like it. Therefore, he decided to continue the movie review segment of the evening program.

Which one of the following identifies a problem with the programming director’s decision process?


(A) He failed to recognize that people are more likely to write letters of criticism than of praise.

(B) He could not properly infer from the fact that some listeners did not like the movie review segment that some others did.

(C) He failed to take into consideration the discrepancy in numbers between favorable and unfavorable letters received.

(D) He failed to take into account the relation existing between the movie review segment and the news.

(E) He did not wait until he received at least 50 letters with unfavorable comments about the movie review segment before making his decision.


Hi AndrewN VeritasKarishma, can you please help me understand the meaning of option B.Appreciate your time and response on this one.

Hello, RohitSaluja. I have not taken a look at the question itself, but choice (B) can be interpreted as saying that the director was not in a position to deduce that just because some listeners did not like something, other listeners might like that very thing.

I hope this information proves useful to you. I will take a look at the question after posting.

- Andrew
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64888 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed uns [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed unsolicited letters from listeners who were expressing comments on the station’s programs. One week, the station received 50 letters with favorable comments about the station’s news reporting and music selection and 10 letters with unfavorable comments on the station’s new movie review segment of the evening program. Faced with this information, the programming director assumed that if some listeners did not like the movie review segment, then there must be other listeners who did like it. Therefore, he decided to continue the movie review segment of the evening program.

Which on e of the following identifies a problem with the programming director’s decision process?


(A) He failed to recognize that people are more likely to write letters of criticism than of praise.

(B) He could not properly infer from the fact that some listeners did not like the movie review segment that some others did.

(C) He failed to take into consideration the discrepancy in numbers between favorable and unfavorable letters received.

(D) He failed to take into account the relation existing between the movie review segment and the news.

(E) He did not wait until he received at least 50 letters with unfavorable comments about the movie review segment before making his decision.


Info about news and music are irrelevant.
We know that he got 10 unfavourable letters about movie review.
He assumed that if some do not like it, there must be others who like it.

What is the flaw in his reasoning? That he cannot assume that if some did not like, some others must have liked. There is no indication that some others must have liked. Getting unfavourable letters does not indicate in any way that there must be some others who liked. And that is the flaw in his reasoning.

This is what (B) says:
He could not properly infer from the fact that some listeners did not like the movie review segment that some others did.

We are saying that he cannot infer that some people liked it based on the fact that some people did not. It is a flaw.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2023
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: United Kingdom
Send PM
Re: Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed uns [#permalink]
Option B is the correct answer because it highlights the director's erroneous assumption that there must be other listeners who did like the movie review segment, which is not necessarily the case.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Every week, the programming office at an FM radio station reviewed uns [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne