It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 06:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 472

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 179

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2017, 20:32
sayantanc2k wrote:
iMyself wrote:
scorpio7 wrote:
Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of Cyprus revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed buildings typical of towns devestated by earthquakes. Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction was due to a major earthquake known to have occured near the island in A.D. 365.

Which of the following,[i] if true, most strongly supports the archaeologists' hypothesis?[/i]

(A) Bronze ceremonial drinking vessals that are often found in graves dating from years preceding and following A.D. 365 were also found in several graves near Kourion.
(B) No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in abundance
(C) Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
(D) Several small statues carved in styles current in Cyprus in the century between A.D. 300 and 400 were found in Kourion.
(E) Stone inscriptions in a form of the Greek alphabet that was definitely used in Cyprus after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion.


Situation:

After excavation of the city, there have been got a pattern of debris and collapsed buildings, which are devastated by the earthquake. Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction
was due to a major (NOT minor) earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
There are two situations I've to consider here:
1. Before A.D. 365 and
2. After A.D. 365

And also I must proof two things here simultaneously:
Part 1:

The destruction was due to an earthquake, which was major (our job is NOT to prove that the destruction was ONLY due to an earthquake because in first sentence of the argument it is already said that the destruction was due to an earthquake but we have to prove that the earthquake was a MAJOR earthquake rather than only earthquake
Part 2:
The destruction was happened in A.D. 365.
According to GMAC, option B is the 100% correct answer.

Part 1:
(B) No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in abundance.
The fragment 1: No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion,
The fragment 2: but coins minted before that year were found in abundance.
That means: (B) The coins, which minted after A.D. 365, were NOT found in Kourion, but the coins, which minted before that year (exactly in A.D. 364), were found in abundance.
What does the bold part infer?
The bold part infers that if someone gets the coin, which was made after 365 (i.e., 366,367,368 to till date), will proof that the destruction was NOT happen in A.D.365. If you got any coin in which there is written A.D. 366 on the site of the coin, it'll definitely proof that the destruction was happened in any day of A.D. 366 (NOT 365 as it is considered after 365 by The fragment 1), if you got any coin in which there is written 2015 on the site of the coin, it must proof that the destruction was happen in any day of 2015 (NOT 2014 or before as it is considered by me The coins, which minted after 2014, were...) to till date today but not tomorrow :) !
So, the fragment 1 ensures that the city had been destroyed by earthquake as ONLY earthquake is discussed in the argument.

Again, problem in option B:
The option B is totally unable to proof that the earthquake was major (NOT minor!). Suppose, someone has got some coins after earthquake, the guy may have these coins for a MINOR earthquake, isn't it?
The argument did not give any indication that if the earthquake is in 8 Richter scale then the earthquake will be major earthquake. And there also should have at least one indication in answer option, which must imply that the earthquake was, of course, major earthquake. But option B hasn't indicated that sort of things.

Analogy: [......statement.....].
[Conclusion]Finally, scientists have hypothesized that the reward was given by the white American. If answer option proves that it is ONLY by 'American' or it is by 'black American', it'll definitely be wrong! The correct answer option must prove that it is ONLY by "White American".

Here, I just want to say that ''adjective'' plays a vital role in this regard.

Part 2:
(B) The coins, which minted after A.D. 365, were NOT found in Kourion, but the coins, which minted before that year (this doesn't mean EXACTLY in A.D. 364, it may be FIRST month of A.D. 364 and also LAST month of A.D. 364), were found in abundance.

Analogy: Suppose, the coins were made on January, 2015 (but ONLY year 2015 will be written NOT January 1st , 10th, 31st , 2015 will be written fully/completely on the site of the coin!) and the earthquake occurred on May 1st , 2015. Suppose, GMAC has got some coins on this earthquake today (February 4, 2017). So, the GMAC MUST NOT say that the earthquake was happened in 2018 (The year 2018 has not come yet!). So, the correct answer option B can???t prove that the destruction was happened in A.D. 365; it, basically, will happen in any day of A.D. 364.

So, if my logic is correct, then GMAC's right option is wrong! But, if my logic doesn't fit with this situation and/or doesn't make any sense, then I'm really sorry for creating excitement to all the students and expert of GMAT Club! :)


It appears that you are presuming that the question is about when the earthquake happened - it is not. It is already established that the earthquake happened in A.D.365. But whether the city was destroyed by that earthquake or by some other reason is the topic of the argument.


Hi sayantanc2k,
Hope you're well brother. It is already established that x=364, here is their equation (argument) => 2x+y=728
Answer option should be, y=0. If someone says that y=anything other than zero, should I accept it?
Shouldn’t it be y=0?
It seems that I’m doing math in CR-that is not at all. Actually, I’m trying to prove something logically. 
_________________

“The heights by great men reached and kept were not attained in sudden flight but, they while their companions slept, they were toiling upwards in the night.”
― Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 179

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 136

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q45 V20
GPA: 3.91
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2017, 10:46
DAYNE wrote:
calvinhobbes wrote:
DAYNE wrote:
C is the only answer that strengthens the CONCLUSION

How so?

Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction was due to a major earthquake known to have occured near the island in A.D. 365.--- conclusion

no other answer choice mentions the earthquake


Hi,

B strengthens the conclusion, C is also a strengthener. Also two options have some loop holes (though the options of strengthen questions may have some loop holes because the options should to some extent strengthen the argument and it does not have to be airtight).

(B) No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in abundance.

Loop Hole: This option opens a possibility that the earthquake did not occur in A.D 365 rather it occurred sometime before A.D 365 (may be in A.D 362).

(C) Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D. 365.

Loop Hole: This option opens a possibility that the historians might have wrongly hypothesized.

So how I shall determine which option is better though both are to some extent strengthening the argument. My problem is that I always think a lot. :-D

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 136

Director
Director
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 839

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Premium Member
Re: Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 06:52
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of   [#permalink] 21 Aug 2017, 06:52

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   [ 83 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The island of Kauai features sobby 4 25 Aug 2017, 10:39
23 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Numerous Ancient Mayan cities have been discovered in the georgepaul0071987 20 31 May 2017, 14:01
134 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered hoogie 40 22 Sep 2017, 00:09
5 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of Cyprus souvik101990 3 11 Jan 2016, 13:03
9 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of PUNEETSCHDV 10 25 Feb 2017, 02:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.