Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 28 Mar 2017, 07:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 17
Location: Thailand
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 08-30-2012
GPA: 2.64
WE: Research (Retail Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [1] , given: 3

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 03:34
1
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (02:07) correct 40% (01:23) wrong based on 570 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics native
C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city
D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representation of known species
E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman empire were familiar
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 139
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 16

Re: GMATPrep CR #26 : need help/explanation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 09:32
Can anybody explain me how the answer is E?
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 17
Location: Thailand
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 08-30-2012
GPA: 2.64
WE: Research (Retail Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [3] , given: 3

Re: GMATPrep CR #26 : need help/explanation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 10:06
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
from the MGMAT explanation, what they did was reverse the assumption of E. so if they HAD a common repertory of mosaic designs, this would invalidate the entire argument above. Therefore, E. is an essential assumption for the argument presented.
Hope this helps
Senior Manager
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 340
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 27

Re: GMATPrep CR #26 : need help/explanation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 11:51
Basically , the conclusion says that travelling artists created mosaics in different parts of roman city , ie one group of artists did all the work through out Roman cities , so an assumption is there are no other groups in the Roman City. E says the same cause if there is a repository you can have more than one group. Hope it helps
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 803
Followers: 359

Kudos [?]: 725 [14] , given: 5

Re: GMATPrep CR #26 : need help/explanation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2012, 18:32
14
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
naruphanp wrote:
Question 26:
Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics native
C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city
D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representation of known species
E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman empire were familiar

Assumption questions require that you understand the structure of the argument.
Background: Sepphoris has mosiacs with animals
Premise: Species in the mosiacs didn't live in Sepphoris at the time
Premise: Same species were found in mosiacs in other Roman cities
Conclusion: Therefore, mosiacs were created by traveling artisans.

Assumptions fill the gap between premises and the conclusion. In other words, assumptions are those unstated facts that must be true for the conclusion to be true. The conclusion states that mosiacs were created by TRAVELING artisans, so you would have to assume that the RESIDENT artisans don't have knowledge of these non-resident species.

A. Stones are not relevant to the conclusion
B. This answer doesn't address how knowledge of species only got to Sepphoris from traveling artisans
C. Interesting answer choice, but it could support a traveling artisan conclusion or a common knowledgebase of species across all of Rome
D. This runs counter to the conclusion - if the species are known, then any artisan (not necessarily a traveling artisan) could have created the mosaics
E. This option states that there isn't a common knowledgebase of species, which supports the conclusion that only TRAVELING artisans (those who pick up knowledge of species as they travel throughout Rome) could have created the mosaics

KW
_________________

Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: GMATPrep CR #26 : need help/explanation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2012, 05:21
E is correct because it states that the travelling artisans had no other knowledge other than what they know from their place.
This directly supports the conclusion.

Hope it helps!
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Schools: Katz '18 (S)
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 2

Re: Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 00:55
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion --the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman empire.

If we negate E ---We get ---There was a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman empire were familiar.

So Sepphoris artist were also familar with how to make mosaic -- so conclusion that traveling artisians created mosaic falls apart.

Sepphoris artist if they knew how to make mosaic --- would have made them.

A. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in teh Sepphoris area ---out of scope-- it does not talk abt who created
B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native --out of cope
C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city -out of scope
D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosiacs are readily identifiable as representation of known species ---out of scope
E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman empire were familiar===correct
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10671
Followers: 958

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2014, 16:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10671
Followers: 958

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2016, 20:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered   [#permalink] 08 Mar 2016, 20:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered num 3 01 Aug 2015, 03:29
2 Excavations of the Roman city of 9 20 Aug 2010, 02:11
38 Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of 74 14 Jun 2009, 20:23
68 Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered 33 13 Feb 2009, 01:54
1 Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of 4 25 Jul 2008, 10:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by