It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 02:35

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1586

Kudos [?]: 607 [8], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 04:45
8
KUDOS
48
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 607 [8], given: 40

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 868

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 123

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 08:05
This is a causal arg. Hence the defender will avoid the alternate cause.

Since the number of childern being sent for treatment is on the rise the counterargument can be - more children are being sent for treatment to nurse hence more are being reported sick. The defender will avoid such a controversy and prevent the arg from getting weakened. Hence C

subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 123

Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 08:17
Why it can't be (B)?

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 40

TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1586

Kudos [?]: 607 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 08:22
@ulm, please negate choice B and see the result.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 607 [0], given: 40

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1268

Kudos [?]: 290 [3], given: 10

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 11:01
3
KUDOS
close call between A and C here.

Negating A means that as the number of nurses has decreased,even though the number of children sent remains the same,children seen/nurse has increased.

Negating C means it is more likely that children will be sent to the nurses now than earlier.

C seems closer to the conclusion here. The number of nurses hasn't been discussed in the stem.

Hence C preferred.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 290 [3], given: 10

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 252

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 4

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2011, 19:15
C

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 13

Location: bangalore, India
Schools: Stanford,MIT, Harvard, Kellogg, LBS, IESE, IE etc
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jun 2011, 23:31
Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years
option C is contradicting the information given in the arguement..

i think C is wrong

i think option D is correct because if there is no usage of chemicals in the home then chemicals are only used in the schools & hence children got affected by that chemical

please explain if i am wrong

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 13

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 00:26
C

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 21

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 05:51
Please can somebody explain it more clearly.I donot understand the logic behind both B and C.
_________________

target:-810 out of 800!

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 21

Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 13

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 05:55
Well indeed it says that the number of children going to nurses now has increased. The next sentence says: Therefore, EITHER, its due to more exposure or the kids just became more sensitive THAN 10 years ago..

In that way C does fit best..

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 11

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Sep 2012, 23:21
@Antik
If B is assumed, It is likely that children go to nurses for a different sort of allergic reaction. However, the passage specified the type of allergy, allergy to chemicals. So, b is beyond the scope of the passage.

If the increase is due to a higher tendency to go to nurses now than 10 years a go, we rule out or question such causes as more sensitivity or exposure. Thus the argument does not hold with out assuming what is mentioned in C. C is correct.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2012
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 62 [18], given: 4

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Sep 2012, 03:37
18
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question Stem
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
Assumption Question- Ask the question - what is required so that the conclusion is true. Also use the negation test on last 2 option choices.

Argument
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of school children sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.

Pre-thinking
More children became aware of the symptoms and reported the same. So they were sent to the nurses.

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
INCORRECT ANSWER - This answer could have been correct if the argument did not mention "PROPORTION". Even if the nurses reduced, the proportion calculation would still remain the same -
$$\frac{No of students sent}{Total no of students}$$

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
INCORRECT ANSWER - "other substances" is outside the scope of the argument

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
CORRECT ANSWER - If the chance that children are sent to the nurse is same, then the conclusion is true.

Negation Test - Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago - So this statement rules out both the options in the conclusion. So this is the CORRECT ANSWER.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
INCORRECT ANSWER - If not used commonly then the chemical may not be a reason. It weakens the conclusion.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
INCORRECT ANSWER - "larger proportion of Renston’s population" - this does not matter. The argument is not talking about this but the proportion of students sent to nurses.
_________________

Regards,
gmatsuperstar

Kudos [?]: 62 [18], given: 4

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 199

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 46

Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 05:15
subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

I picked d.Need every options explanation

Kudos [?]: 456 [0], given: 46

Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 06:29
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Quote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

Paraphrasing the main point: According to nurses, something has changed in the past 10 years to make schoolchildren more sensitive to chemicals.
Paraphrasing the conclusion: 1) more chemicals, or 2) more sensitivity to the chemicals

A. I saw this as irrelevant. The number of nurses doesn't matter to establishing a proportion. The main point and conclusion can still be valid even with less nurses.
B. Comparing chemical allergies to other allergies is not within the stated argument. Also irrelevant.
C. This is correct. It offers an alternative explanation of why nurses would see an increase in the number of students sent to them with chemical allergies even if there weren't more chemicals or if the sensitivities had not changed.
D. The location of the exposure to chemicals is not relevant to the argument or conclusion. If D were true and chemicals were commonly used elsewhere, that would actually strengthen argument 1) as a reason for increased exposure.
E. Irrelevant. Schoolchildren to overall population proportion has nothing to do with the passage.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 3595 [3], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 14:28
3
KUDOS
mun23 wrote:
subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

I picked d.Need every options explanation

Hi Mun23.
My pleasure to help.

Premise: exposure to chemical ==> allergic reactions
Premise: the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions increase
Conclusion: more children exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive

Assumption: proportion = children who got allergy and were brought to hospital / Total children.
KEY is "children actually were brought to hospital". If they got allergy and NOT went to hospital, they are not counted.

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
Wrong. Out of scope.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
Wrong. Out of scope

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
Correct. This is the assumption above.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
Wrong. SHELL GAME. "are NOT used in houses & apartment" DOES NOT MEAN "are used in school". What if the chemical are not commonly used in both school & houses.==> We cannot conclude children exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
Wrong. We cannot conclude the number of children increased or decreased, because the proportion also depends on the total population that may increase or decrease.

Hope it helps a little bit.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3595 [3], given: 123

Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1184

Kudos [?]: 1981 [0], given: 152

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2013, 02:29
Hi e-GMAT(Chiranjeev),
Can you please come up with an explanation and analysis for this qs.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 1981 [0], given: 152

Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 101 [2], given: 34

Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 09:55
2
KUDOS
In these types of questions, the argument provides us with possible conclusions; what we must intend to find is that are any alternate reasons refuted or not ?

If C were not true, then the argument will fall apart, as it gives us an alternate reason for the increase in the number of students who are ill. Therefore, C has to be the assumption.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Kudos [?]: 101 [2], given: 34

Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 35

GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 12:47
1
KUDOS
ramannanda9 wrote:
In these types of questions, the argument provides us with possible conclusions; what we must intend to find is that are any alternate reasons refuted or not ?

If C were not true, then the argument will fall apart, as it gives us an alternate reason for the increase in the number of students who are ill. Therefore, C has to be the assumption.

Finally, I understood.

Thanks.(+1)
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 35

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 997 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Nov 2013, 08:28
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

_________________

General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 997 [1], given: 321

Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 57

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Nov 2013, 11:44
nitindas wrote:
Option 'C' says that 'Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago' -- If this were to be assumed then the statement 'school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years' becomes false.

Can anybody explain plz.

C is the assumption because C option eliminates the alternative cause (more children tend to be sent to school now) to confirm the reasons mentioned in the conclusion (exposed to greater quantity of chemicals or children now are more sensitive to chemicals than ten years ago ).

Option D: weaken
Option E: strengthen

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 57

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools   [#permalink] 06 Nov 2013, 11:44

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 111 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by