GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Oct 2018, 17:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 96
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 20:40
2
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (02:05) correct 56% (02:03) wrong based on 572 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1183
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member
Re: assumption  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 21:04
A, B & C are out of scope. Finally boils down to either D or E. D gives a more direct reason as to why the deer population would still exist even after the constructions.

D is the answer.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 154
Re: assumption  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2012, 01:04
What is the source? The question is written so badly.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 122
Re: assumption  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2012, 01:22
1
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied



Hi,

The best way to find underlying assumptions is to negate the answer choices to see which one threatens the conclusion the most.

A) If the number of commercial vehicles plying through the new roads increased, then more deers would be hit even irrespective of the fact that the housing would be occupied or not. Moreover, the conclusion leaves a huge void with the phrase."once the housing is occupied". This leads us to question: "what if the houses were not occupied?". That would lead us to answer A. Hence this seems to be correct. But let us go through the other statements before marking A.

B) If the deers were not as attracted to the forest edges near the houses as to the edges near the streets, it is not affecting the conclusion that strongly. It doesn't matter where the deers are getting hit, so long they are hit by cars going to the houses.

C) This choice is 'out of context'.

D) What if this were not true? There would not be sufficient forest left for the deers. Hence, negating this choice is, actually, strengthening the conclusion. This is an 'opposite answer choice'.

E) This choice is 'out of context'.

Hence, the answer is A.

Regards,

Shouvik.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1691
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: assumption  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2012, 03:14
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied


Very great question, guy!
it costs me 2:25 with a right shot.

A and E out right away because of "Out of scope"
A. deer hit by commercial vehicles
E. Dear hunting
B. The argument does not focus on the comparison BTW the number of deers attactedto the forest edge around new houses AND
the number of deers to the forest edge alongside roads, but ON the number hit by car before and after the development.
B out
C. The prediction is based on the current context, so C, in years past, does not work, C out
D remains.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 146
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2012, 03:19
I chose D and I believe its correct
I am also convinced by the explanation given by Edvento.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2014, 21:24
Hi,

I picked B. Would someone explain why B is wrong over D. Thank you!
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 62
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2014, 00:41
1
In Option B

The argument is talking about the forest edges of houses and the forest edges of streets.However what we are looking for is forest edges and forest edges of streets.If we had in the option that the deers consider forest edges and forest edges of new roads similar than the option might be correct.

In Option D

Negating Option D, we get that the the development ll not leave sufficient deer population so sustain. Accordingly the deer population will fall. Hence the number of hits ll decline too :)
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 335
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2014, 01:48
2
@sun1526: B is irrelevant to the argument. We are not concerned if deers are attracted to the edges near the houses (where they arguably have little danger) as much as they are attracted to the edges near the road (where they have the most danger). This option has no role to play in arriving at the conclusion.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2014, 07:36
Thank you very much "dream21" and " AmoyV "!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2017, 02:03
[quote="shreerajp99"]What is the source? The question is written so badly.[/quote

agree this question is written so badly!
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 640
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2017, 01:46
Narrowed down to B and D - Used negation technique - B - not same frequency of attraction - ambiguous may increase deaths , may decrease deaths, D negation - not significant deer left - Very few deer come out - Breaks Conclusion

IMO its D .
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Posts: 46
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2018, 14:44
What is the source on this question? There are numerous typos that distract from the content
GMAT Club Bot
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest &nbs [#permalink] 11 Apr 2018, 14:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.