GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jan 2019, 08:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winning strategy for a high GRE score

January 17, 2019

January 17, 2019

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 93
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2012, 19:40
2
8
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (02:05) correct 57% (02:03) wrong based on 579 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied
VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1171
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2012, 20:04
A, B & C are out of scope. Finally boils down to either D or E. D gives a more direct reason as to why the deer population would still exist even after the constructions.

D is the answer.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 154

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 00:04
What is the source? The question is written so badly.
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 118

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 00:22
1
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied

Hi,

The best way to find underlying assumptions is to negate the answer choices to see which one threatens the conclusion the most.

A) If the number of commercial vehicles plying through the new roads increased, then more deers would be hit even irrespective of the fact that the housing would be occupied or not. Moreover, the conclusion leaves a huge void with the phrase."once the housing is occupied". This leads us to question: "what if the houses were not occupied?". That would lead us to answer A. Hence this seems to be correct. But let us go through the other statements before marking A.

B) If the deers were not as attracted to the forest edges near the houses as to the edges near the streets, it is not affecting the conclusion that strongly. It doesn't matter where the deers are getting hit, so long they are hit by cars going to the houses.

C) This choice is 'out of context'.

D) What if this were not true? There would not be sufficient forest left for the deers. Hence, negating this choice is, actually, strengthening the conclusion. This is an 'opposite answer choice'.

E) This choice is 'out of context'.

Hence, the answer is A.

Regards,

Shouvik.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1658
Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 02:14
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied

Very great question, guy!
it costs me 2:25 with a right shot.

A and E out right away because of "Out of scope"
A. deer hit by commercial vehicles
E. Dear hunting
B. The argument does not focus on the comparison BTW the number of deers attactedto the forest edge around new houses AND
the number of deers to the forest edge alongside roads, but ON the number hit by car before and after the development.
B out
C. The prediction is based on the current context, so C, in years past, does not work, C out
D remains.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 130
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 02:19
I chose D and I believe its correct
I am also convinced by the explanation given by Edvento.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2014, 20:24
Hi,

I picked B. Would someone explain why B is wrong over D. Thank you!
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 58
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2014, 23:41
1
In Option B

The argument is talking about the forest edges of houses and the forest edges of streets.However what we are looking for is forest edges and forest edges of streets.If we had in the option that the deers consider forest edges and forest edges of new roads similar than the option might be correct.

In Option D

Negating Option D, we get that the the development ll not leave sufficient deer population so sustain. Accordingly the deer population will fall. Hence the number of hits ll decline too
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Retired Moderator
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 323
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 00:48
2
@sun1526: B is irrelevant to the argument. We are not concerned if deers are attracted to the edges near the houses (where they arguably have little danger) as much as they are attracted to the edges near the road (where they have the most danger). This option has no role to play in arriving at the conclusion.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 06:36
Thank you very much "dream21" and " AmoyV "!
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2017, 01:03
[quote="shreerajp99"]What is the source? The question is written so badly.[/quote

agree this question is written so badly!
Director
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 612
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2017, 00:46
Narrowed down to B and D - Used negation technique - B - not same frequency of attraction - ambiguous may increase deaths , may decrease deaths, D negation - not significant deer left - Very few deer come out - Breaks Conclusion

IMO its D .
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Posts: 46
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2018, 13:44
What is the source on this question? There are numerous typos that distract from the content
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest &nbs [#permalink] 11 Apr 2018, 13:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.