It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 15:49

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Olin (St. Louis) R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Fuqua R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2012, 21:29
I agree that E is the correct answer choice. But there is a possibility that journalists who regard the new product line as cheap and low-market may start to write negative comments about the company. The argument never mentioned that the articles were in favor of the company. It was featured only, not necessarily for any good reasons. Similarly, the press may start to write negative reviews about it, writing nonetheless.
_________________

__________________________________________________________________________
Challenges are what make life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful
__________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 832

Kudos [?]: 1646 [0], given: 197

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2013, 15:08
mbafall2011 wrote:
Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in revenue, and was featured in 8 major articles in the fashion press. This year, our company’s revenue has practically quadrupled, so we should expect to be featured in at least 20 major articles in the fashion press.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the fashion executive’s reasoning in the above argument?

(A) A competing fashion line was featured more often in the fashion press after its revenues increased.

(B) Five years ago, the company’s revenue was less than \$1 million, and the company was not featured in any major articles in the fashion press.

(C) The company’s revenue nearly quadrupled because of the introduction of a fashion line geared for sale in the European fashion capital of Milan; however, most of the fashion press is headquartered domestically in New York.

(D) A major automaker in the region was the subject of twice as many features in auto industry press when the automaker filed for bankruptcy.

(E) The company’s revenue increased dramatically because of the introduction of lower-priced lines sold in nationwide discount chains, greatly reducing the brand’s cachet among fashion journalists.

OE

The executive argues that, if \$5M in revenue gets the company 8 articles, \$20M in revenue ought to get the company at least 20 articles – that is, that the number of times the company will be featured in the press is proportional to the company’s revenue.

The question asks which of the statements, if true, weighs most heavily against the executive’s reasoning.

A. This statement support’s the executive’s conclusion. Incorrect.

B. This statement provides some support to the idea that revenue is proportional to press. Incorrect.

C. The passage gives no indication that New York fashion journalists would be disinterested in writing about a fashion line that has become successful in the fashionable city of Milan. Incorrect.

D. This statement seems to imply that low revenues can correlate to more feature articles in the press. The statement does not indicate that high revenues could not also lead to more feature articles in the press. Comparing the experience of an automaker to that of a fashion line also introduces the major assumption that the two are analogous. Incorrect.

E. The explanation that revenue increased due to the fashion line’s introducing a discount line sold in stores NOT highly regarded by the fashion press casts serious doubt on the conclusion that the press would feature the line in many more articles than it did last year. Answer choice E is correct.

_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Kudos [?]: 1646 [0], given: 197

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10203

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 07:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10203

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2016, 14:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had \$5 million in   [#permalink] 27 Mar 2016, 14:40

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by