Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had $5 million in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack  It is currently 23 Feb 2017, 00:39 GMAT Club Daily Prep Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email. Customized for You we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History Track Your Progress every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance Practice Pays we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here. Request Expert Reply Events & Promotions Events & Promotions in June Open Detailed Calendar Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had$5 million in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 384
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 174 [1] , given: 87

Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had $5 million in [#permalink] Show Tags 04 Feb 2012, 10:24 1 This post received KUDOS 00:00 Difficulty: (N/A) Question Stats: 79% (01:54) correct 21% (00:59) wrong based on 31 sessions HideShow timer Statistics Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had$5 million in revenue, and was featured in 8 major articles in the fashion press. This year, our company’s revenue has practically quadrupled, so we should expect to be featured in at least 20 major articles in the fashion press.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the fashion executive’s reasoning in the above argument?

A. A competing fashion line was featured more often in the fashion press after its revenues increased.
B. Five years ago, the company’s revenue was less than $1 million, and the company was not featured in any major articles in the fashion press. C. The company’s revenue nearly quadrupled because of the introduction of a fashion line geared for sale in the European fashion capital of Milan; however, most of the fashion press is headquartered domestically in New York. D. A major automaker in the region was the subject of twice as many features in auto industry press when the automaker filed for bankruptcy. E. The company’s revenue increased dramatically because of the introduction of lower-priced lines sold in nationwide discount chains, greatly reducing the brand’s cachet among fashion journalists. I will provide the official answer later. If you have any questions you can ask an expert New! Intern Joined: 13 Jul 2011 Posts: 44 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8 Re: Fashion press [#permalink] Show Tags 04 Feb 2012, 15:44 +E Manhattan GMAT Instructor Joined: 22 Mar 2011 Posts: 964 Followers: 313 Kudos [?]: 848 [1] , given: 25 Re: Fashion press [#permalink] Show Tags 05 Feb 2012, 00:10 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post The underlying assumption here is that major articles are directly correlated to revenues. We have no reason to believe that the industry actually works that way, so there are many possible ways to weaken the argument. There are many new ideas that, if true, would break the feeble connection between the premise and the conclusion in this argument. Here are a few that would work: 1) Major articles are typically written about brands that fashion journalists find new and exciting, and sales volume has little influence in such matters. 2) Only revenue from new designs influences what brands get written about, and most of the company's revenue this year is from old designs. 3) Fashion companies with revenue of more than$10 million a year are seen as "too corporate" by fashion journalists, and are not often featured in major articles.
4) No company is featured in more than one major article per month.

I'm sure you can think of plenty more along these lines. So what about C? That seems tempting. If all the journalism action is in New York, maybe efforts in Milan will not get much attention. But we have to be careful here. The choice just says that the fashion press is mostly *headquartered* in New York. That tells us nothing about what coverage they provide in Milan. Besides, a few journalists in Milan might be able to produce 20 major articles on their own! We just don’t have enough information.

E, on the other hand, provides some new information. The company’s new lines are not of great interest to fashion journalists. Therefore they may not be featured in many articles, and we certainly have no reason to believe that they will be featured four times as often as last year. E weakens the argument.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 289
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 51

Re: Fashion press [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Feb 2012, 00:18
E must be the answer !!
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Re: Fashion press   [#permalink] 05 Feb 2012, 00:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Sales manager: Last year the total number of meals sold in our company 1 16 Feb 2017, 16:09
10 Rail Executive: Last year we discontinued our Somerton 9 23 Jul 2016, 23:39
15 Fashion company executive: The number of competing brands of 8 14 Aug 2013, 11:23
5 Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had $5 million in 25 20 Feb 2011, 09:04 17 Last year, after the number of subway riders who had had their pockets 23 27 Jan 2011, 06:18 Display posts from previous: Sort by Fashion Executive: Last year, our company had$5 million in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.