It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 15:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 23:11
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:58) correct 25% (00:42) wrong based on 7 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
A) compensating state governments for damage to
B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 23:32
Straight A.
' damage to their ' is correct usage.
Also C and E give the impression that governments are getting compensation for damaging their own natural resources.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 23:53
'A' - permits & compensating are verbs next to one another. I find it awkward

but the llsm between b]for damage to [/b] and for injury to people
makes me thing that 'A' is the winner here...

[/b]

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 01:20
I go for 'a' based just on the what the main sentence wants to convey i.e the state govts resources are damaged. using the gerund 'damaging' implies the state govt have damaged their own resources which alters the meaning of the stem altogether.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 02:12
Option (A).
The other options do not go well with "....but does not allow claims...".
Also 'damage to' sounds more appropriate in this context.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 02:46
^ A ^

Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.

||lism

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 03:00
After some initial confusion I chose 'A' by POE..

But now coming back to the initial hiccup I had, can any one clarify on the usage of 2 verbs going hand in hand next to one another in the original stem - permits compensating is it correct ??

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 03:35
"Permits Compensation" should be correct, however this grouping is not very common. Most commonly, the word 'in' is between such word groups.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 03:37
Try 'helps negotiating' as an example for better understanding.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 05:23
GMATPsycho wrote:
Try 'helps negotiating' as an example for better understanding.

Sorry GMATPSYCHO.. Still not clear.. Also I found something strange in OG 10th edition Being a United States Citizen. I thought it should have been an United States Citizen.
Did not expect these unpleasant surprises...

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 05:55
'A' and 'an' signal that the noun modified is indefinite, referring to any member of a group. These indefinite articles are used with singular nouns when the noun is general; the corresponding indefinite quantity word some is used for plural general nouns.

The rule is:
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant: a boy, a dog
an + singular noun beginning with a vowel: an elephant, an umbrella
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant sound: a user (sounds like 'yoo-zer,' i.e. begins with a consonant 'y' sound, so 'a' is used)
some + plural noun: some girls

If the noun is modified by an adjective, the choice between a and an depends on the initial sound of the adjective that immedately follows the article:

a broken egg
an unusual problem
a European country (sounds like 'yer-o-pi-an,' i.e. begins with consonant 'y' sound)
Similarly, a United States citizen (sounds like 'ye-night-ed')

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 08:13
damage to....injury to....

Select (A) and click confirm

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 08:34
Compensating for and damage to are correct idioms - A for me

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 18:34
GMATPsycho wrote:
'A' and 'an' signal that the noun modified is indefinite, referring to any member of a group. These indefinite articles are used with singular nouns when the noun is general; the corresponding indefinite quantity word some is used for plural general nouns.

The rule is:
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant: a boy, a dog
an + singular noun beginning with a vowel: an elephant, an umbrella
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant sound: a user (sounds like 'yoo-zer,' i.e. begins with a consonant 'y' sound, so 'a' is used)
some + plural noun: some girls

If the noun is modified by an adjective, the choice between a and an depends on the initial sound of the adjective that immedately follows the article:

a broken egg
an unusual problem
a European country (sounds like 'yer-o-pi-an,' i.e. begins with consonant 'y' sound)
Similarly, a United States citizen (sounds like 'ye-night-ed')

Thank you GMATPsycho. I appreciate it.

As everything else,some how, this theory should have escape my memory long time ago..

Pronounciations are unique and distinct these days..We some time act as intrepeters for native english speakers (it has happened to us in North Asia and even in Australia..no offense guys...Just sharing my thoughts. .)

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 19:48
Must be A.

Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.

1. ||ism
2. Remove the bold part of the sentence and then try the choices.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1978

Kudos [?]: 719 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2013, 17:39
kedarthumma wrote:
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
A) compensating state governments for damage to
B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

Has to be (A) all other answer distort the meaning

Kudos [?]: 719 [0], given: 355

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2015, 00:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of   [#permalink] 04 Dec 2015, 00:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by