It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 13:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Few businesses will voluntarily implement environmental

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2005, 18:37
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Few businesses will voluntarily implement environmental protection measures that benefit the public if those measures reduce profitability. Even though such measures may cost less to implement than the total value of their benefits to society, the company making the decision bears all of the cost and receives little, if any, of the benefit. For example, XYZ Corporation has for the last 10 years refused to install smokestack filters to reduce the air pollution emitted by its factory, claiming that the cost would be prohibitive. Therefore, if such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or intervention.

The bolded portions of the argument above perform which of the following functions?

The first phrase states the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the truth of which supports the validity of the conclusion

The first phrase states a premise supporting the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the falsity of which would disprove the first phrase.

The first phrase describes a general principle, and the second provides evidence countering that principle

The first phrase states a claim supporting the conclusion, but for which no evidence is given, and the second describes an example supporting the conclusion.

The first phrase states a generalization supporting the conclusion, and the second cites an example supporting that generalization

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 373

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2005, 15:16
My answer is B. The first BF is the main premise that is necessary for the conclusion that the govt needs to fund environmental measures and the second BF is the example of the premise that companies do not undertake enviro measures if it affects profitability.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2005, 15:26
AJB77
B is a good choice.
But I would go for E, only because I don't know the meaning of the word "countering" in (C):)

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 894

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2005, 17:27
E it is.

First boldface is a generalization (hint: few businesses) about the reluctance to implement protection measures that benefit the public if those measures reduce profitability.

The conclusion here is that â€œif such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or interventionâ€

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 03:06
Here Conclusion is:Government shoud take intiative few businesses would take such steps.

Evidence: XYZ.....

We can clearly remove A,C, D

Incorrect The first phrase states the conclusion(this is not the conclusion), and the second provides evidence, the truth of which supports the validity of the conclusion

The first phrase states a premise supporting the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the falsity of which would disprove the first phrase. (lets keep this)

IncorrectThe first phrase describes a general principle, and the second provides evidence countering that principle (no countering between the BFs)

IncorrectThe first phrase states a claim supporting the conclusion, but for which no evidence is given(some evidence is given for the conclusion), and the second describes an example supporting the conclusion.

The first phrase states a generalization supporting the conclusion, and the second cites an example supporting that generalization(lets keep this)

We are left with B & E.

In B the falsity of the 2nd BF would not disprove teh 1st BF and hence we can remove B.

Thus it should be E[/quote]

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 05:25
[quote="Folaa3"]E it is.

First boldface is a generalization (hint: few businesses) about the reluctance to implement protection measures that benefit the public if those measures reduce profitability.

The conclusion here is that â€œif such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or interventionâ€
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 05:55
Here the conclusion is
if such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or intervention.

So A is out
B is out because if the second BF is false, first bf will not be incorrect. the key word here is few business will voluntarily...... so if XYZ does not implment...still there can be som other companies that will implement.

C is out becasue the second phrase doesnot disagree with the first one.

I am left with D and E now.

Now the second phrase cites the example to support the conclusion, not to support the first phrase ( claim or generalization).

So I will pick D over E.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 06:39
it's a straight (E).

i thought (B) was close, but the falsity of the evidence (2nd bold) will not weaken the first, since the first says 'few companies'.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 07:20
I would go with E.

I worked backwards with the bolded areas noticing that the second was an example that supports the first bold items.

fresinha12 wrote:
Few businesses will voluntarily implement environmental protection measures that benefit the public if those measures reduce profitability. Even though such measures may cost less to implement than the total value of their benefits to society, the company making the decision bears all of the cost and receives little, if any, of the benefit. For example, XYZ Corporation has for the last 10 years refused to install smokestack filters to reduce the air pollution emitted by its factory, claiming that the cost would be prohibitive. Therefore, if such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or intervention.

The bolded portions of the argument above perform which of the following functions?

The first phrase states the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the truth of which supports the validity of the conclusion

The first phrase states a premise supporting the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the falsity of which would disprove the first phrase.

The first phrase describes a general principle, and the second provides evidence countering that principle

The first phrase states a claim supporting the conclusion, but for which no evidence is given, and the second describes an example supporting the conclusion.

The first phrase states a generalization supporting the conclusion, and the second cites an example supporting that generalization

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2005, 16:17
OA pleae......
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2005, 13:28
Clear E !

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angeles

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2005, 02:31
OA Fresinha?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2005, 05:31
It is E.
The first phrase is a generalization and the second phrase is a example supporting it. What needs to be understood is that it is just an example and not an evidence.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2005, 06:15
For me the second phase is an example to support the conclusion, which is presented at the end of the text. The second phrase is not a piece of evidence. Therefore, IMO, A, B and C are out. D should be left out because the second phase of the text gives some evidente to support that claim. E should be the correct answer.

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 20:38
The conclusion is obvious: "Therefore, if such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or intervention. "

Evidence: "XYZ......" (the second bold face)

a) Out: First BF does not state the conclusion

b) Out: The first BF because it is not the premise. Definition of premise: "a statement that if assumed to be true from which a conclusion be drawn."

c) Out: It is not a general principle since the scope is too narrow

d) Out: Does support the conclusion. Only evidence supports the conclusion.

I pick E.

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 15:27
we need to know the OA here
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 18:30
E.

OA is desperately needed fresinha12

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 19:30
I have seen this in the OG (I think), I am pretty sure OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1883

Kudos [?]: 387 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 19:43
fresinha12 wrote:
[b]Few businesses will voluntarily implement environmental protection measures that benefit the public if those measures reduce profitability[/b]. Even though such measures may cost less to implement than the total value of their benefits to society, the company making the decision bears all of the cost and receives little, if any, of the benefit. For example, XYZ Corporation has for the last 10 years refused to install smokestack filters to reduce the air pollution emitted by its factory, claiming that the cost would be prohibitive. Therefore, if such measures are to be implemented to protect the environment, they must be initiated by government regulation or intervention.

The bolded portions of the argument above perform which of the following functions?

The first phrase states the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the truth of which supports the validity of the conclusion

The first phrase states a premise supporting the conclusion, and the second provides evidence, the falsity of which would disprove the first phrase.

The first phrase describes a general principle, and the second provides evidence countering that principle

The first phrase states a claim supporting the conclusion, but for which no evidence is given, and the second describes an example supporting the conclusion.

The first phrase states a generalization supporting the conclusion, and the second cites an example supporting that generalization

A:The conclusion is the sentence containing "therefore" ---> the first bold part can't be the conclusion---> A out.

B: the first bold part says "few" ---> not all ---> the falsity of the second bold part CAN'T disprove the first phrase!---> B out.

C is clearly wrong, the second bold part doesn't counter the first bold part.

D: The bold part doesn't support the conclusion, it supports the first bold part ---> out

E it is.

Kudos [?]: 387 [0], given: 0

Re: CR BF...   [#permalink] 10 Nov 2005, 19:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Few businesses will voluntarily implement environmental

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.