GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jul 2018, 06:52

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Posts: 86
Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.9
Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 22:32
1
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:21) correct 24% (01:26) wrong based on 68 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films made these days focus excessively on superficial aspects such as dramatic sets visually enhanced by computer graphics. Since such aids were not used twenty years back when film directors did not indulge in any such gimmickry and concentrated solely on narrating the story through bare minimum props, it shows that the current directors seem to think that they can fool people by packaging their low-content films with visually fantastic elements.

Which of the following will be most useful in evaluating the claim made by the critic above?

a. Is there any difference between the demographics of the audience twenty years back and now?
b. Has the amount of money invested in film-production changed over the past twenty years?
c. Does international audience now form a significantly higher proportion of the audience for mythological films than it did twenty years back?
d. When compared to film directors twenty years back, do the current breed of directors have a wider access to international sci-fi films that contain heavy use of computer graphics?
e. Did film directors twenty years back have comparable access to computer graphics as do the current breed of film directors?

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 80
Re: Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 23:06
2
IMO Option is E.
The resources available with the directors twenty years back and now should be compared.The directors twenty years back narrated the story with bare minimum props probably because they did not have access to computer graphics.The directors preferred narration because of non availability of access to computer graphics not because they did not want to use computer graphics.A suitable comparison between the directors twenty years back and current directors can be done if only all conditions are same.Please give me kudos. I need them badly to increase my score.
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2017
Posts: 42
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 4
Re: Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2017, 00:21
Evaluate question:

Hmm. The stem says : 1. Mythological films these days focus on superficial aspects.
2. such aids were not used twenty years back. Directors concentrated solely on narrating the story through bare minimum props
Conc: Current directors fool people with elements.

Comparison between current directors and directors in the past.

a. Is there any difference between the demographics of the audience twenty years back and now? - Demographics of people might have changed but the choice of people to watch high content movies might not have changed.
b. Has the amount of money invested in film-production changed over the past twenty years? Money was never mentioned in stem and was never the concern. Out of scope.
c. Does international audience now form a significantly higher proportion of the audience for mythological films than it did twenty years back? International audience can or cannot influence the types of movies created by director.
d. When compared to film directors twenty years back, do the current breed of directors have a wider access to international sci-fi films that contain heavy use of computer graphics? Even if they didn't have access, they still could have used the graphics on their own.
e. Did film directors twenty years back have comparable access to computer graphics as do the current breed of film directors? Compares he 2 directors as asked in the stem. If the previous directors didnt have access to computer graphics, this could be the reason for them to not fool the people with gimmicks.
_________________

You give kudos, you get kudos. :D

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1212
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2017, 02:44
fmik7894 wrote:
Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films made these days focus excessively on superficial aspects such as dramatic sets visually enhanced by computer graphics. Since such aids were not used twenty years back when film directors did not indulge in any such gimmickry and concentrated solely on narrating the story through bare minimum props, it shows that the current directors seem to think that they can fool people by packaging their low-content films with visually fantastic elements.

Which of the following will be most useful in evaluating the claim made by the critic above?

a. Is there any difference between the demographics of the audience twenty years back and now?
b. Has the amount of money invested in film-production changed over the past twenty years?
c. Does international audience now form a significantly higher proportion of the audience for mythological films than it did twenty years back?
d. When compared to film directors twenty years back, do the current breed of directors have a wider access to international sci-fi films that contain heavy use of computer graphics?
e. Did film directors twenty years back have comparable access to computer graphics as do the current breed of film directors?

A is out of scope as it does not provide any information about the conclusion.
B Money invested may increased or decreased but it does not show how that money was invested .
C Well it may be true but it does not give us nay insights about the movie .
D Out of scope
E correct answer if the directors twenty years back had the same technology that current directors then what the author is conclusion is true .

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films &nbs [#permalink] 24 Sep 2017, 02:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Film critic: As film studies show, the mythological films

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.