GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 15:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 814
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 02:20
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

89% (01:16) correct 11% (01:50) wrong based on 92 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our country for the past few decades, have been effectively controlled by the new policies that the government implemented in the last ten years. Families from the lower economic strata who could earlier not afford to pay for basic necessities such as primary education and healthcare can now afford them easily.

The minister’s claim relies on the assumption that

A. wealthy families take primary education and healthcare services from the same institutions as families from the lower economic strata
B. families from the lower economic strata have now become wealthy
C. affordability of basic necessities by families from the lower economic strata is an acceptable sign of reduced disparities
D. the primary education and healthcare services have not undergone any cost increase in the last decade
E. improvement in affordability of families from the lower economic strata is not limited to primary education and healthcare

Source - expert global

_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Best Gmat Resource:
GmatPrep CR|GmatPrep SC|GmatPrep RC

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Posts: 109
CAT Tests
Re: Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 02:32
2
C - if affordability of basic necessities is not a indication of reduced disparity then the statement falls apart.
So....IMO... OPTION C

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

kudos please if it helped you.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 137
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 03:06
Pre thinking:
Minister states that economic disparities have been controlled post implementation of new policies. Gives an example of low economic strata families. We need to look for an option which links both of them


A. wealthy families take primary education and healthcare services from the same institutions as families from the lower economic strata
- Incorrect.The argument is talking about having basic needs and not about equalling wealthy people
B. families from the lower economic strata have now become wealthy
- Incorrect. Same reason as A
C. affordability of basic necessities by families from the lower economic strata is an acceptable sign of reduced disparities
- Correct. This is inline with our pre thinking. If you negate this then the conclusion will shatter
D. the primary education and healthcare services have not undergone any cost increase in the last decade
- Incorrect. These services not undergoing any cost increase doesn't suggest that economic disparities have reduced.
E. improvement in affordability of families from the lower economic strata is not limited to primary education and healthcare
- Incorrect. This doesn't shatter the conclusion when negated.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Correct me If I'm wrong !! looking for valuable inputs

KUDOS please, if you like the post or if it helps !!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 10 May 2018
Posts: 103
Concentration: Finance, Sustainability
Re: Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 05:24

Premise

Families from the lower economic strata who could earlier not afford to pay for basic necessities such as primary education and healthcare can now afford them easily.

Conclusion

Economic disparities have been effectively controlled by the new policies that the government implemented in the last ten years.

Assumption

The answer choice which bridges the gap between the premise and the conclusion within the context of the information provided.
aragonn wrote:
Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our country for the past few decades, have been effectively controlled by the new policies that the government implemented in the last ten years. Families from the lower economic strata who could earlier not afford to pay for basic necessities such as primary education and healthcare can now afford them easily.

The minister’s claim relies on the assumption that

A. wealthy families take primary education and health care services from the same institutions as families from the lower economic strata.
This answer choice misses the easily affordable aspect from the information.

B. families from the lower economic strata have now become wealthy.
Even if families from lower income strata have become wealthy, the previously wealthier families may have become wealthier still. Not sufficient.

C. affordability of basic necessities by families from the lower economic strata is an acceptable sign of reduced disparities.
Sufficiently bridges the gap between the conclusion and the premise. In addition, mentions affordability as an acceptable sign, exactly what was missing from the information given. Hence this should be the correct assumption.

D. the primary education and health care services have not undergone any cost increase in the last decade.
Same error as option (A).

E. improvement in affordability of families from the lower economic strata is not limited to primary education and healthcare.
The information provided doesn't tell anything other than healthcare and primary education. We cannot be sure of this to be the correct answer.

Source - expert global


Correct answer: Option (C)

What about some Kudos?
_________________

Stuck in the 600-700 score bracket? I welcome you to read my four-step course of action to a modest score.
I also invite you to critique and help me find flaws in my modus operandi. Thanks!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 343
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)
CAT Tests
Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 07:57
The best way to solve assumption based CR questions is to negate statements. If the conclusion breakes after negation of some statement then this option is the right option.

C. affordability of basic necessities by families from the lower economic strata is NOT an acceptable sign of reduced disparities - in this case all claims of the Finance Minister do not work. Hense this is the right answer.
_________________

I'm looking for a study buddy in NY, who is aiming at 700+. PM me.

Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our &nbs [#permalink] 22 Jul 2018, 07:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Finance Minister: Economic disparities, which had been growing in our

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.