It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 07:39

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3970
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2013, 11:50
6
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

75% (03:09) correct 25% (02:35) wrong based on 92

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

69% (02:05) correct 31% (00:58) wrong based on 87

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

58% (01:50) correct 42% (01:53) wrong based on 84

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

Question Stats:

46% (02:28) correct 54% (01:11) wrong based on 82

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

Question Stats:

63% (01:37) correct 37% (01:55) wrong based on 79

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

Question Stats:

77% (01:56) correct 23% (02:26) wrong based on 82

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

Question Stats:

54% (03:26) correct 46% (03:00) wrong based on 81

HideShow timer Statistics

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions during the 1970s and 1980s raise questions about why firms initiate and consummate such transactions. One study showed, for example, that acquiring firms were on average unable to maintain acquired firms’ pre-merger levels of profitability. A second study concluded that postacquisition gains to most acquiring firms were not adequate to cover the premiums paid to obtain acquired firms. A third demonstrated that, following the announcement of a prospective merger, the stock of the prospective acquiring fi rm tends to increase in value much less than does that of the firm for which it bids. Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones.

Acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation’s resources efficiently from less to more efficient sectors of its economy, but the individual acquisitions executives arranging these deals must see them as advancing either their own or their companies’ private economic interests. It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions. These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition. Alternatively, the acquisition acts of bidders may derive from
modeling: a manager does what other managers do.

Questions 64–70 refer to the passage above.

64. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) review research demonstrating the benefi ts of corporate mergers and acquisitions and examine some of the drawbacks that acquisition behavior entails
(B) contrast the effects of corporate mergers and acquisitions on acquiring firms and on firms that are acquired
(C) report findings that raise questions about a reason for corporate mergers and acquisitions and suggest possible alternative reasons
(D) explain changes in attitude on the part of acquiring firms toward corporate mergers and acquisitions
(E) account for a recent decline in the rate of corporate mergers and acquisitions

OA &OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
64. A The research cited in the passage calls into question whether mergers and acquisitions are beneficial to firms.
B Th e passage is not concerned with comparing the relative effects of mergers and acquisitions on the acquired and acquiring firms.
C Correct. Th e passage surveys reports that question the reasons given by firms when they acquire other firms and suggests other reasons for these acquisitions.
D Th e passage does not indicate that there has been a change in the attitude of acquiring firms toward mergers and acquisitions.
E The passage does not indicate that there has been a decline in the rate of mergers and acquisitions.

65. The findings cited in the passage suggest which of the following about the outcomes of corporate mergers and acquisitions with respect to acquiring firms?

(A) They include a decrease in value of many acquiring firms’ stocks.
(B) They tend to be more benefi cial for small firms than for large firms.
(C) They do not fulfill the professed goals of most acquiring firms.
(D) They tend to be beneficial to such firms in the long term even though apparently detrimental in the short term.
(E) They discourage many such firms from attempting to make subsequent bids and acquisitions.

OA & OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
65 A The passage suggests that the stock of acquiring firms tends to increase in value (lines 12–13), albeit less than the firm it acquires.
B The three studies cited in the passage do contrast the effects of corporate mergers on acquiring firms and on acquired firms, but the effects in question are signifi cant only insofar as they contribute to the wider investigation into why mergers take place at all.
C Correct. The passage indicates that even while acquiring firms cite economic goals, the results of the studies indicate that these goals are not being met.
D The passage makes no comparison between the long-term and short-term gains of acquiring firms.
E The passage does not indicate that firms have been affected by the results of the studies cited.

66. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?

(A) Their known benefi ts to national economies explain their appeal to individual firms during the 1970s and 1980s.
(B) Despite their adverse impact on some firms,they are the best way to channel resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.
(C) They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.
(D) They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider recognition.
(E) Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring fi rm help to explain the frequency with which they occur.

OA & OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
66. A The passage indicates that while mergers and acquisitions may benefit the national economy, the appeal of mergers and
acquisitions must be tied to companies’ private economic interests (lines 19–22).
B The passage makes no judgment as to the best way for firms to help channel resources from less to more effi cient economic sectors.
C The passage makes no comparison between the influence of poor monitoring by boards and that of executive incentives.
D The passage makes no prediction as to future trends in the market for mergers and acquisitions.
E Correct. The passage states that factors other than economic interests drive mergers and acquisitions.

67. The author of the passage mentions the effect of acquisitions on national economies most probably in order to

(A) provide an explanation for the mergers and acquisitions of the 1970s and 1980s overlooked by the fi ndings discussed in the passage
(B) suggest that national economic interests played an important role in the mergers and acquisitions of the 1970s and 1980s
(C) support a noneconomic explanation for the mergers and acquisitions of the 1970s and 1980s that was cited earlier in the passage
(D) cite and point out the inadequacy of one possible explanation for the prevalence of mergers and acquisitions during the 1970s and 1980s
(E) explain how modeling affected the decisions made by managers involved in mergers and acquisitions during the 1970s and 1980s

OA &OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
67 A The passage does not mention national economies as part of an explanation for the occurrence of mergers and acquisitions.
B The passage suggests that the effect of acquisitions on national economies is not tied to any explanations for why acquisitions occur.
C The eff ect of acquisitions on national economies is not mentioned in the passage as an explanation for why acquisitions occur.
D Correct. Th e passage uses the mention of national economies as part of a larger point questioning the stated motivations behind firms’ efforts to acquire other firms.
E In the passage, modeling is unrelated to the idea that acquisitions may have a desirable effect on national economies.

68. According to the passage, during the 1970s and 1980s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms

(A) tended to be more profi table before a merger than after a merger
(B) were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
(C) were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
(D) anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
(E) experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced

OA OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
68. A The passage does not indicate whether the profitability of acquiring firms tended to be greater or less after a merger.
B The passage does not indicate that acquiring firms were concerned about the impact of their actions on national economies.
C The passage does not mention the actions of managers at firms that are being acquired.
D The passage does not discuss whether acquiring firms tended to expect greater overall economic gains than actually occurred.
E Correct. The passage indicates that the stock value of acquiring firms grew less than that of the firms they were attempting to acquire.

69. According to the passage, which of the following was true of corporate acquisitions that occurred during the
1970s and 1980s?

(A) Few of the acquisitions that f rms made were subsequently divested.
(B) Most such acquisitions produced only small increases in acquired firms’ levels of profitability.
(C) Most such acquisitions were based on an overestimation of the value of target firms.
(D) The gains realized by most acquiring firms did not equal the amounts expended in acquiring target firms.
(E) About half of such acquisitions led to long-term increases in the value of acquiring firms’ stocks.

OA &OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
69 A The passage does not discuss post - acquisition divesting.
B The passage indicates that on average, the profitability of acquired firms fell after being acquired (lines 5–7).
C The passage does not indicate whether most acquiring firms overestimated the value of the firms they acquired.
D Correct. The passage states that for most acquiring firms the costs of buying the acquired fi rm were greater than the gains derived from acquiring it.
E The passage does not indicate what percentage of acquiring firms, if any, experienced long-term gains in their stock value.

70. The author of the passage implies that which of the following is a possible partial explanation for acquisition behavior during the 1970s and 1980s?

(A) Managers wished to imitate other managers primarily because they saw how financially beneficial other firms’ acquisitions were.
(B) Managers miscalculated the value of firms that were to be acquired.
(C) Lack of consensus within boards of directors resulted in their imposing conflicting goals on managers.
(D) Total compensation packages for managers increased during that period.
(E) The value of bidding firms’ stock increased significantly when prospective mergers were announced.

OA &OE
[Reveal] Spoiler:
70 A While the passage indicates that managers may have modeled their behavior on other managers, it does not provide a reason for why this would be so.
B Correct. The author states that one explanation for acquisition behavior may be that managers erred when they estimated the value of firms being acquired.
C The author discusses a lack of monitoring by boards of directors but makes no mention of consensus within these boards.
D The author does not discuss compensation packages for managers.
E The passage does not state how significantly the value of the bidding firm’s stock increased upon announcing a merger but only that it increased less in value than did the stock of the prospective firm being acquired.

.

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #5 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #6 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #7 OA

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Last edited by Vyshak on 03 Dec 2016, 10:50, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 148
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Sep 2014, 08:56
2
KUDOS
dream21 wrote:
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur

Hey there,

If you look at the last line of para 1 it says "Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones" where "common" more or less means "frequent".

Hope this helps!
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 12
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 00:13
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
roopika2990 wrote:
Can anyone explain 67? I did not find any of them right

D would be the correct answer choice here. First, locate the sentence you need to read to answer this question. The impact on national economies is mentioned in the first line of the second paragraph, so we need go no farther then here to find the answer. What does this sentence say about the effect on national companies? That although there may be a positive effect, this is not why such deals were arranged. This implies that some people have considered the positive effect on national economies to be an explanation of all those mergers and acquisitions. Now, notice the bare logical structure of this sentence: X may well be..., but....Y. In other words, Although X, Y. What is X - Acquisitions' impact on national economies. What is Y? The company or personal interest of executives. So what this sentence telling us? That X is not an adequate explanation of mergers and acquisitions, but Y is. This is precisely what answer choice D is telling us: cite and point out the inadequacy of one possible explanation, etc.
_________________

http://econgm.at/economistgmat
Economist GMAT Tutor
(866) 292-0660

Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 72
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 06:14
1
KUDOS
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 286
Location: India
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2015, 22:54
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi Anurag,

The word IMPLIES (in this question) - is towards the word "Partial Explanation" as the answer choice B (explicitly mentioned in the passage) is only one of the three factors mentioned in the second paragraph.

Since, the choice only referes to one factor that is why "implies that ..possible partial explanation".
Hope it helps!
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2015
Posts: 51
Schools: Sloan '19
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 23:46
1
KUDOS
kyoshi441994 wrote:
Can anyone explain question 68 for me? I don't really get it:(

Posted from my mobile device

68. According to the passage, during the 1970s and 1980s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms----

In the first paragraph , three study findings are mentioned highlighting the impact of M&A on acquired and acquiring firms .
we need to go back and look for details mentioned about "bidding firm" that is "acquiring firm"-

(A) tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
- not mentioned
(B) were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
- point taken from 2nd paragraph first line . it is generic , not mentioning that bidding firms had this view
(C) were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
-not mentioned
(D) anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
- "anticipated " not discussed anywhere
(E) experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced
..yes . correct . - finding of study 3.

hope it helps.
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 199
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2013, 22:43
Can anyone explain 67? I did not find any of them right
Intern
Status: preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 16 Jul 2013
Posts: 39
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 10-15-2013
GPA: 3.53
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2013, 07:04
daagh could you plz post the official answers?

_________________

لا الله الا الله, محمد رسول الله

You never fail until you stop trying ,,,

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 120
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2014, 12:26
Question 69
Also is this a 700+ RC..because I got only 3 right in like 12 mins
Or I will just accept that I have to work hard on RCs.
_________________

Feel Free to Press Kudos if you like the way I think .

Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 21:45
What's considered an acceptable time frame for this passage + set of questions? Should it ideally be completed within 9 minutes? I completed it in 10:06 because I had to stop and think for a few of them. Felt like I was taking longer than I should have. Input would be great. Thanks!
Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 597
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Nov 2014, 06:12
maggie27 wrote:
dream21 wrote:
Can anyone explain Q66

I am not getting how to infer the bold part in option E
Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur

Hey there,

If you look at the last line of para 1 it says "Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones" where "common" more or less means "frequent".

Hope this helps!

I had also problems with this question. The statement about the frequency is wrong, because it was not mentioned in the passage, it's just an assumption. But E seems to be the only wright answer compared with other answer choices. As I see, sometimes right answers can be only derived by excluding more wrong answers.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Manager
Status: GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 180
Location: India
GRE 1: 2280 Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE: Editorial and Writing (Education)
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Nov 2014, 23:20
In the second paragraph, the author explicitly says "It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions."
This statement tells you that factors other than economic interests help explain acquisitions -- a logical inference is that if you know why the acquisitions occur, you can explain the frequency with which they occur with a high degree of accuracy. Hence E.

The first paragraph provides examples of firms initiating acquisitions even when they don't derive economic benefit from them, and says that acquisitions remain common. "Common" in this context seems to mean "frequent", but even this inference is not required; the inference in the above paragraph should suffice.
_________________

EnterMBA

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 75
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 May 2015, 09:43
282552 wrote:
Question 69
Also is this a 700+ RC..because I got only 3 right in like 12 mins
Or I will just accept that I have to work hard on RCs.

D says that most such acquisitions were based on an overestimation of the value of target firms.

Actually this piece of information about overestimation of the value of target firms appears in the second para.

However, the information that we need to look for this question, is limited to the first para, since that is where it is specifically covered what the scenario was in the 70s and 80s.
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1416
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2015, 22:08
IlanaEconomistGMAT wrote:
roopika2990 wrote:
Can anyone explain 67? I did not find any of them right

D would be the correct answer choice here. First, locate the sentence you need to read to answer this question. The impact on national economies is mentioned in the first line of the second paragraph, so we need go no farther then here to find the answer. What does this sentence say about the effect on national companies? That although there may be a positive effect, this is not why such deals were arranged. This implies that some people have considered the positive effect on national economies to be an explanation of all those mergers and acquisitions. Now, notice the bare logical structure of this sentence: X may well be..., but....Y. In other words, Although X, Y. What is X - Acquisitions' impact on national economies. What is Y? The company or personal interest of executives. So what this sentence telling us? That X is not an adequate explanation of mergers and acquisitions, but Y is. This is precisely what answer choice D is telling us: cite and point out the inadequacy of one possible explanation, etc.

this passage is easy but the questions are harder. reading skill is never taught and discussed in rc forum though it is fatally important.

thank you expert, sir
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 33
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Aug 2015, 15:53
Hello everyone ....

I have a doubt in question 70, its pretty simple but my concern is the question's phrasing . The questions says" The author of the passage implies..... ?"
Now as far as I know if we have a imply question the answer to that question will not be explicitly mentioned in the passage and that is not case here. Answer choice B is clearly stated.Its like restating the given.

So is my thumb rule for imply questions incorrect ?? or this a strange case.

Thanks and kudos for solutions !
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10156
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Oct 2016, 01:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2017
Posts: 1

Show Tags

09 Mar 2017, 06:32
Can anyone explain question 68 for me? I don't really get it:(

Posted from my mobile device
09 Mar 2017, 06:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Antonia Castañeda has utilized scholarship from women’s studies and Me 0 15 Jun 2017, 03:42
Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and 6 13 Nov 2016, 21:23
7 In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically 5 26 Apr 2017, 03:26
44 The modern multinational corporation is described as having 18 20 May 2017, 10:28
10 As the economic role of multinational, global corporations 16 17 Oct 2016, 19:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by