It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 20:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 11:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

13. Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of the cattle disease CXC, the death rate from the disease was 5 percent of all reported cases, whereas today the corresponding figure is over 18 percent. It is clear, therefore, that during these past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence.

Which one of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC.
(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes.
(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies showed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness.
(D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities.
(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time.

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1706

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Cow disease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 13:21
A.

There are two ways to weaken the argument.
1. if the deathes reported were actually misreported as in A.
2. if the number of reports five years ago was substantiaslly higher with few dathes and no of reports now is subtantially low with high deaths. for example:
five years ago: no of reports=400, % death= 5% i.e. no of death = 20.
now: no of reports=100, % death= 18% i.e. no of death = 18.

the question provides information about the first inforation. therefore, A should be correct.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 14:33
D)...
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 15:52
D.

C actually strengthen the statement. Some of the cases are attributed to other diseases, implying the actual increase is even more.

Same with B. meaning the actual % should be less than 5%.. does not explain the increase.
D is straight forward (I guess!!)..The reported cases are mostly severe cases, increasing % cattle died. (cattle died/cases reported)
_________________

krish

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 848

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 16:04
One more for D

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2005, 22:57
1) 5 yrs ago, the death rate from cxc was 5% of all reported cases

2) Today, the figure is over 18% of all reported cases.

3) During past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence. <-- conclusion

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC.
- doesn't streghten the argument

(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes.
- Doesn't strenghten the argument

(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies showed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness.
- Still can't explain the large perentage

(D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities.
- If so, then only deaths due to CXC are reported.

(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time.
- Not important.

D is the best option. If only deaths due to cxc is reported, then the figure is not accurate since mild cases are nto included when the % is computed in the study.

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: Hyderabad
Re: CR: Cow disease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2005, 00:44
HIMALAYA wrote:
A.

There are two ways to weaken the argument.
1. if the deathes reported were actually misreported as in A.
2. if the number of reports five years ago was substantiaslly higher with few dathes and no of reports now is subtantially low with high deaths. for example:
five years ago: no of reports=400, % death= 5% i.e. no of death = 20.
now: no of reports=100, % death= 18% i.e. no of death = 18.

the question provides information about the first inforation. therefore, A should be correct.


A would lead to the conclusion that the number of reported deaths because of CXC is less than the actual number.

D should be it

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2005, 03:04
It's D)

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1706

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Cow disease [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2005, 07:17
Vithal wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
A.

There are two ways to weaken the argument.
1. if the deathes reported were actually misreported as in A.
2. if the number of reports five years ago was substantiaslly higher with few dathes and no of reports now is subtantially low with high deaths. for example:
five years ago: no of reports=400, % death= 5% i.e. no of death = 20.
now: no of reports=100, % death= 18% i.e. no of death = 18.

the question provides information about the first inforation. therefore, A should be correct.


A would lead to the conclusion that the number of reported deaths because of CXC is less than the actual number.

D should be it


agree with you, vithal. thanx....

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2005, 10:53
Agree with D...Who knows what the farmers might have thought about serious cases without reporting?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Answer [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2005, 07:42
The OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Answer   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2005, 07:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.