It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 08:18

# Live Now:

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 297

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 7

Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2009, 07:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of the cattle disease CXC, the death rate from the disease was 5 percent of all reported cases, whereas today the corresponding figure is over 18 percent. It is clear, therefore, that during these past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence.
Which one of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC.
(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes.
(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies snowed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness. (D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities.
(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time.
_________________

"CEO in making"

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 7

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 808

Kudos [?]: 373 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2009, 07:14
Is it D?

---
(3:30)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 373 [0], given: 106

SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1512

Kudos [?]: 1005 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2009, 08:20
sudeep wrote:
Is it D?

---
(3:30)

I got D as well.

Let me give you an example to make this problem clearer. Suppose that out of 100 persons reported to be sick, only 10% of them actually died. Now, we have report saying that 20% of the people have now died because of the disease. Well, 20% can also be reached if the total number of people who got sick actually reduced to 50. So suppose that we still have the same number of people who died, which is 10.....10/50 is 20%. So just because the percent has increased doesn't necessarily mean that the actual number of those who died has increased. The total number of people who were reported as sick could have reduced, making the overal percentage bigger.

Kudos [?]: 1005 [0], given: 1

Re: North American outbreak   [#permalink] 07 Jun 2009, 08:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by