It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 14:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 292 [2], given: 7

Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 02:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:06) correct 37% (01:05) wrong based on 509 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is

(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is

(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet

(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is

(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet

[Reveal] Spoiler:
My Doubt is that in A , the last clause "yet is " should be "yet it is " .. since yet is a co-ordinating conjunction it should join two independent clauses , but the correct answer has not it ..
Am is missing something here ??
Experts advice needed.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The Best Way to Keep me ON is to give Me KUDOS !!!
If you Like My posts please Consider giving Kudos

Shikhar


Last edited by hazelnut on 16 Sep 2017, 21:30, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 292 [2], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 9

WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 03:14
shikhar wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet


My Doubt is that in A , the last clause "yet is " should be "yet it is " .. since yet is a co-ordinating conjunction it should join two independent clauses , but the correct answer has not it ..
Am is missing something here ??
Experts advice needed.


Read it this way:

Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is X yet (it) is Y.
This is not // when you use it.

"Yet is" is correct here.
D has incorrect use of but also.

So the correct answer is A.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 7

Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 03:30
skbhagra wrote:
shikhar wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet


My Doubt is that in A , the last clause "yet is " should be "yet it is " .. since yet is a co-ordinating conjunction it should join two independent clauses , but the correct answer has not it ..
Am is missing something here ??
Experts advice needed.


Read it this way:

Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is X yet (it) is Y.
This is not // when you use it.

"Yet is" is correct here.
D has incorrect use of but also.

So the correct answer is A.



Does that mean that the sentence below is also correct ??
it is pricy , yet is affordable.
or should it be
it is pricey yet it is affordable.
_________________

The Best Way to Keep me ON is to give Me KUDOS !!!
If you Like My posts please Consider giving Kudos

Shikhar

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 7

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 136

Kudos [?]: 63 [1], given: 22

Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 06:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
shikhar wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet


My Doubt is that in A , the last clause "yet is " should be "yet it is " .. since yet is a co-ordinating conjunction it should join two independent clauses , but the correct answer has not it ..
Am is missing something here ??
Experts advice needed.


I think this should be the correct structure. By elimination we can reach A easily.
B) not only is but also exclusively designed ----- not only but also should have parallel parts
C) not only missing.
D) not only missing.
E) not only completely man-made but also is ---- not only but also should have parallel parts
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

Kudos [?]: 63 [1], given: 22

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 9

WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 08:26
shikhar wrote:
Does that mean that the sentence below is also correct ??
it is pricy , yet is affordable.
or should it be
it is pricey yet it is affordable.


It depends on the exact sentence but it would be correct to say :

......it is pricy , yet is affordable.....
or
......it is pricy yet affordable.

The choice depends on how it is used and how the sentence ends.

"it is pricey yet it is affordable." is wordy.

Hope it helps.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 9

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 64 [3], given: 45

Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Feb 2013, 17:50
3
This post received
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is

(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is

(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet

(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is

(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet


could someone break down how they thought of this question? it's little difficult to believe it has been thought of like that
_________________

We appreciate your kudos'

Kudos [?]: 64 [3], given: 45

Expert Post
11 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4430

Kudos [?]: 8484 [11], given: 102

Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2013, 11:57
11
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
manimgoindowndown wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.
(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet

I'm happy to help with this. :-) This is a great question --- MGMAT really writes good questions!

The basic issue in this one is --- where the common words fall when you have parallel elements in a "not only ... but also" structure. Here's a blog that addresses this issue:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/common-par ... orrection/

Consider the following abstract structure involving "not only ... but also" or any similar correlative structure.

blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

I am going to call the purple part "outside" the "not only ... but also" structure, and the green part "inside" the structure. The BIG IDEA is that any common word that applies to both the parallel terms inside the structure can appear
(a) one outside the structure
or
(b) twice inside the structure, once before each term

For example, this is legal:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

This is also legal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah

But this is illegal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also blah blah blah
and this is similarly illegal:
blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
Those have the common term once inside only. A favorite illegal pattern, very common the GMAT SC, is this:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
the good old "once outside, once inside" mistake --- they love this one!

In this MGMAT SC question, the simple word "is" the common word that applies to both parallel terms.
(A) correctly has the word appear once outside the "not only ... but also" structure --- this is correct.
(B) has the word "is" once inside, in front of the first term, omitted from the second term
(C) & (D) don't have the not only at all, just the but also --- the structure is incomplete
(E) ah, the classic "once outside, once inside" mistake

Here's another practice SC question exploring some of the same ideas:
http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3290
When you submit your answer to that question, the next page will have a full video explanation.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8484 [11], given: 102

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 45

Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2013, 20:09
Took a little to understand but I think it's a GREAT way to think of idiomatic expressions (not only...but also) being thrown in with other modifiers. I actually found A awkward initially while reading the sentence and by process of elimination thought B was the best choice even though according to your rule and observation it is incorrect.

B also isn't a parallel construction like you observed.


As always thanks !
_________________

We appreciate your kudos'

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 45

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 165

Reviews Badge
Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2013, 22:19
mikemcgarry wrote:
manimgoindowndown wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.
(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet

I'm happy to help with this. :-) This is a great question --- MGMAT really writes good questions!

The basic issue in this one is --- where the common words fall when you have parallel elements in a "not only ... but also" structure. Here's a blog that addresses this issue:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/common-par ... orrection/

Consider the following abstract structure involving "not only ... but also" or any similar correlative structure.

blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

I am going to call the purple part "outside" the "not only ... but also" structure, and the green part "inside" the structure. The BIG IDEA is that any common word that applies to both the parallel terms inside the structure can appear
(a) one outside the structure
or
(b) twice inside the structure, once before each term

For example, this is legal:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

This is also legal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah

But this is illegal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also blah blah blah
and this is similarly illegal:
blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
Those have the common term once inside only. A favorite illegal pattern, very common the GMAT SC, is this:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
the good old "once outside, once inside" mistake --- they love this one!

In this MGMAT SC question, the simple word "is" the common word that applies to both parallel terms.
(A) correctly has the word appear once outside the "not only ... but also" structure --- this is correct.
(B) has the word "is" once inside, in front of the first term, omitted from the second term
(C) & (D) don't have the not only at all, just the but also --- the structure is incomplete
(E) ah, the classic "once outside, once inside" mistake

Here's another practice SC question exploring some of the same ideas:
http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3290
When you submit your answer to that question, the next page will have a full video explanation.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)


Mike, thank you for the grammar lesson. Could you also give some pointers to the "yet is..." usage? I guess the lack of a pronoun "it" bugs me. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 165

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 45

Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2013, 22:29
stoy4o wrote:
mikemcgarry wrote:
manimgoindowndown wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.
(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet

I'm happy to help with this. :-) This is a great question --- MGMAT really writes good questions!

The basic issue in this one is --- where the common words fall when you have parallel elements in a "not only ... but also" structure. Here's a blog that addresses this issue:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/common-par ... orrection/

Consider the following abstract structure involving "not only ... but also" or any similar correlative structure.

blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

I am going to call the purple part "outside" the "not only ... but also" structure, and the green part "inside" the structure. The BIG IDEA is that any common word that applies to both the parallel terms inside the structure can appear
(a) one outside the structure
or
(b) twice inside the structure, once before each term

For example, this is legal:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

This is also legal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah

But this is illegal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also blah blah blah
and this is similarly illegal:
blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
Those have the common term once inside only. A favorite illegal pattern, very common the GMAT SC, is this:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
the good old "once outside, once inside" mistake --- they love this one!

In this MGMAT SC question, the simple word "is" the common word that applies to both parallel terms.
(A) correctly has the word appear once outside the "not only ... but also" structure --- this is correct.
(B) has the word "is" once inside, in front of the first term, omitted from the second term
(C) & (D) don't have the not only at all, just the but also --- the structure is incomplete
(E) ah, the classic "once outside, once inside" mistake

Here's another practice SC question exploring some of the same ideas:
http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3290
When you submit your answer to that question, the next page will have a full video explanation.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)


Mike, thank you for the grammar lesson. Could you also give some pointers to the "yet is..." usage? I guess the lack of a pronoun "it" bugs me. Thanks!



So 1. you check the idiomatic construction like Mike did 2. The parallelism with yet has to do with what is before and after it being the same since the 'common' or 'it' as mike said is outside of the conjunction.

It's just the same concept applied again. Do you understand it? Or am I wrong here Mike, and the 'common' can only apply to idioms?

Another reason why I would see no problem with just having is, in addition to the it already being stated is, what would that it be referring to? That would be ambiguous
_________________

We appreciate your kudos'

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 45

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 124 [1], given: 165

Reviews Badge
Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2013, 22:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
Quote:
So 1. you check the idiomatic construction like Mike did 2. The parallelism with yet has to do with what is before and after it being the same since the 'common' or 'it' as mike said is outside of the conjunction.

It's just the same concept applied again. Do you understand it? Or am I wrong here Mike, and the 'common' can only apply to idioms?

Another reason why I would see no problem with just having is, in addition to the it already being stated is, what would that it be referring to? That would be ambiguous


I see what you're saying and I may be wrong, but I don't think the same inside/outside common rule that Mike explained about the idiomatic expression applies here. Having "it" next to "yet" would refer to the same subject to which "IT is not only..." refers to (aka. "Trail" - the only subject). My only reasoning for why "yet is ..." is correct is that "yet it is..." makes the clause independent. In this case it is not gramatically correct to connect independent clauses with a comma.

Kudos [?]: 124 [1], given: 165

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2013, 03:14
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

A is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is

B not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is. distorts parallelism in two places. 1: in Not only..but also . 2. It (<--Non parallel part in non-underline portion) it is...doesn't make sense

C is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet. distorts parallelism

D is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is. distorts parallelism

E is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet
distorts parallelism
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 75

1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4290

Kudos [?]: 7934 [1], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2013, 11:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The golden rule to follow the correlative conjunction parallelism in such cases as --- (not only….. but also), (both ---- and) etc is this. Simply ensure that what are on the right- hand side of these two conjunctions are both in the same structure or part of speech. As per the tenets of this creed,
(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is ---- perfect bet; and correct choice
(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is --- //ism problem
(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet --- not only is missing
(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is --- not only is missing
(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet--- //ism problem
A special note on “not only--- but also”. It is not imperative that when you use not only, you have to necessarily use ‘but also’ You can be content with ‘not only--- but’ and leave out the ‘also’. But such a phenomenon is rare in GMAT domain. Just keep it in your memory bank. But if you use - but also- , you must necessarily have - not only - in the first arm. You can not dispense with -not only-, in such cases.

Some theory about yet. Yet is one of the FANBOYS (For, And, Not, But, Or, Yet and So) coordinating conjunctions. A coordinating conjunction can perfectly merge two ICS with just a comma. But you must ensure that the conjunction is necessarily there.

I ran fast, for I wanted to catch the train.
I ran fast, and (I) caught the train
I am not running fast, nor do I intend to
I ran fast but (I) missed the train
I have to run fast, or I will miss the train
I ran fast, yet (I) missed the train
I ran fast, so I caught the train
In some cases you may repeat the subject or simply ignore it; still the sentences make sense
As per this maxim, yet preceded by a comma can join two independent clauses. But using just yet without a verb will break the //ism. You cannot combine a clause and a phrase.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509


Last edited by daagh on 30 Oct 2016, 04:22, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 7934 [1], given: 364

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2013
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2013, 16:27
can someone explain how the meaning is changed from

exclusively designed and designed exclusively for human use

they both seem the same to me

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 971 [0], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2013, 16:33
laserglare wrote:
can someone explain how the meaning is changed from

exclusively designed and designed exclusively for human use

they both seem the same to me

Yes they mean the same. The POE in the above sentence involves the correct use of Not only..but also.
Designed exclusively or exclusively designed won't affect the decision
_________________

How to select your BSchool?
General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 971 [0], given: 321

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 6

Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2013, 18:11
No need to go into meaning in this question.

is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is - is not only X but also Y + POE
not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is - "is" is coming between "not only X" - Rule: Not only is X but also is Y,
is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet - no not only for but also.
is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is - no not only for but also.
is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet - not only X but also is.

Meaning difference:
Phone is designed exclusively for human use. - Modifying Use - Dogs cannot use.
iPhone is exclusively designed for rich people. - modifying designing process.

Hope this helps!

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2013
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 13:31
THanks for the responses above!!

I read on a different gmat forum that there was a second issue in which B slightly changed the meaning of the sentence, making B more incorrect.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Dec 2013
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 4

Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 05-15-2014
Re: Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation tr [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2014, 22:52
To me the choice A is also wrong -

Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

The two statements after colon - "it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use" and "yet is classified as a state park" are separated by comma and yet, so these should be two independent clauses, but the second clause is missing a subject (it should be "yet it is"). Can somebody explain how the choice A is correct?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 4

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 62

Schools: ISB '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V42
GPA: 3
Reviews Badge
Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 05:52
mikemcgarry wrote:
manimgoindowndown wrote:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.
(A) is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(B) not only is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet it is
(C) is completely man-made but also exclusively designed for human use, yet
(D) is completely man-made but also has been designed exclusively for human use, yet is
(E) is not only completely man-made but also is exclusively designed for human use, yet

I'm happy to help with this. :-) This is a great question --- MGMAT really writes good questions!

The basic issue in this one is --- where the common words fall when you have parallel elements in a "not only ... but also" structure. Here's a blog that addresses this issue:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/common-par ... orrection/

Consider the following abstract structure involving "not only ... but also" or any similar correlative structure.

blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

I am going to call the purple part "outside" the "not only ... but also" structure, and the green part "inside" the structure. The BIG IDEA is that any common word that applies to both the parallel terms inside the structure can appear
(a) one outside the structure
or
(b) twice inside the structure, once before each term

For example, this is legal:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also blah blah blah

This is also legal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah

But this is illegal:
blah blah blah not only COMMON blah blah blah but also blah blah blah
and this is similarly illegal:
blah blah blah not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
Those have the common term once inside only. A favorite illegal pattern, very common the GMAT SC, is this:
blah blah blah COMMON not only blah blah blah but also COMMON blah blah blah
the good old "once outside, once inside" mistake --- they love this one!

In this MGMAT SC question, the simple word "is" the common word that applies to both parallel terms.
(A) correctly has the word appear once outside the "not only ... but also" structure --- this is correct.
(B) has the word "is" once inside, in front of the first term, omitted from the second term
(C) & (D) don't have the not only at all, just the but also --- the structure is incomplete
(E) ah, the classic "once outside, once inside" mistake

Here's another practice SC question exploring some of the same ideas:
http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3290
When you submit your answer to that question, the next page will have a full video explanation.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)



Thanks for the explanation Matt. However, in choice A not only preceedes an adverb (completely) while but also preceedes a verb (designed). Doesn't it make the sentence structurally not parallel. Please help

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 62

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4430

Kudos [?]: 8484 [0], given: 102

Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 13:09
rishabchoraria wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Matt. However, in choice A not only preceedes an adverb (completely) while but also preceedes a verb (designed). Doesn't it make the sentence structurally not parallel. Please help

Dear rishabchoraria,
I'm happy to respond. :-) BTW, my name is Mike. :-)

Here's version (A), the OA:
Florida’s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use recreation trail paved over an old rail bed, is a curious paradox: it is not only completely man-made but also designed exclusively for human use, yet is classified as a state park.

The Parallelism in this OA is perfect. You see, parallelism is not purely a grammatical structure following strict mathematical rules --- if you get too formalistic about parallelism, you will completely misunderstand it. Logic & meaning are as important to parallel structure as is grammar. Here, we are giving two descriptions of the Trail --- it is
(1) completely man-made
(2) designed exclusively for human use
In terms of meaning, these two phrases are completely parallel. Don't be so literalistic in your analysis of parallelism --- parallelism is a highly sophisticated structure that accommodates a wide variety of constructions. If you approach it in a formulaic manner, you will totally misunderstand it.

Here are a couple blogs you may find helpful:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/parallelis ... orrection/
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-paral ... ce-inside/
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/dropping-c ... -the-gmat/

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8484 [0], given: 102

Re: Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use   [#permalink] 29 Jul 2014, 13:09

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Florida s Gainesville-Hawthorne State Trail, a mixed-use

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.