GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

 It is currently 28 May 2018, 01:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 13
Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 16:53
5
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:21) correct 50% (01:46) wrong based on 832 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation, Lakeview's election board claimed that the increased participation in its precinct resulted from the new busing campaign that brought many voters to their neighborhood polling station on Election Day.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?

A. Determining the average increase in voter participation in each neighborhood of Lakeview.

B. Using polling data to predict the participation rates for the upcoming election in Lakeview's precinct.

C. Comparing the total number of voters participating when the busing campaign brought them to their neighborhood polling station to the total number of voters participating before the busing campaign.

D. Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.

E. Comparing the long-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter registration patterns with the short-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter participation.
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 40
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 19:52
2
KUDOS
Went for D. got a little confused with c and d but chose d as c states the same thing stated in premise.
_________________

Intern
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 17
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 20:06
Imo c
Before the busing campaign stats wi directly tell us how the busing campaign helped in increased participation.

Option D lacks the direct impact

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 13
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 20:12
The OE (Veritas Prep)

The comparison suggested in D would be useful in evaluating Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increase in its voter participation. If the increase in voting is as great in precincts that are, except for the existence of busing campaigns, demographically similar to Lakeview, then the conclusion is undermined. However, if the increase in participation is not as great in such precincts as in Lakeview, the election board's claim is supported. Thus, choice D is the best answer. Choices A and B are both inappropriate because they concern only the rates of participation, and do not assess a hypothesis of the causes of participation. Choices C and E suggest comparisons that would not assess the election board's claim about this election. Rather, choices C and E suggest comparisons of separate elections within Lakeview, where factors other than the busing campaign may cause different rates of participation.

But I'm still not convinced as to why C is incorrect.
Intern
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 17
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 20:25
1
KUDOS
Actualy after reading d again it does make sense.
It directly talks about increased participation rather than total number as in option C.
Moreover it also covers the affect of excluding busing campaigns which was the basic premise I chose C in must place.

I don't think C is wrong but D is better

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 162
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2014, 17:19
I think A suits the best. And I can even explain that.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?

Isn't option A doing it the best?
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 345
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2014, 16:00
1
KUDOS
gauravkaushik8591 wrote:
I think A suits the best. And I can even explain that.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?

Isn't option A doing it the best?

If had elected option A, the question would have been: "which...would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the effects of the increased voter participation in its precincts.?

Clearly, this is a causal problem and the evaluate question stem requires us to find the answer that is most apt to support or weaken the conclusion.

A) Determining the average increase in voter participation in each neighborhood of Lakeview. An average increasing by a lot or just some indicates little about the busing campaign. For example, what if one precinct increased by 1000 percent while another precinct increased by 1/2 percent? That doesn't explain much, but begs the question - what in fact brought the increase in voters?

D) Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.
Comparing precinct with buses and comparing precinct without buses is a purer choice. If the precinct without buses brought as many voters as the precinct with buses, then the busing campaign wasn't the cause in the increase of voters. Perhaps it was the candidate himself or herself.
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1891
Concentration: Finance
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2014, 12:12
1
KUDOS
Could anyone please elaborate why C is incorrect here?

Thanks!
Kudos rain!
Cheers
J
Intern
Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship
WE: Design (Computer Software)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2014, 10:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jlgdr wrote:
Could anyone please elaborate why C is incorrect here?

Thanks!
Kudos rain!
Cheers
J

Hi Jgldr

My line of reasoning is : Option C only gives the difference the busing campaign made in terms of numbers but did not give any reason (cause) as to why it increased. However, option D gives the reason by comparing it with other similar setting.
Manager
Status: PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 168
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Mannheim
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22
GPA: 3.1
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2014, 03:04
tusharGupta1 wrote:
jlgdr wrote:
Could anyone please elaborate why C is incorrect here?

Thanks!
Kudos rain!
Cheers
J

Hi Jgldr

My line of reasoning is : Option C only gives the difference the busing campaign made in terms of numbers but did not give any reason (cause) as to why it increased. However, option D gives the reason by comparing it with other similar setting.

hello,
what if the facilities in other demographically similar city are hopeless,or what if their politicians are hopeless or that city is under terror threat..there are many excuses for the people not voting although being demographically similar..i agree with ua explanation about C but couldnt understand y D is rite..
please clarify whether m thinking in right direction..
thankx
_________________

ITS NOT OVER , UNTIL I WIN ! I CAN, AND I WILL .PERIOD.

Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 23
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2014, 11:22
Question stem -
Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?
C - just a comparison of numbers ( with bus or without bus) won't help much to assess the cause
D - if the participation rate in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns is higher, the bus campaigned failed. If lower, the campaign was successful and if equal, the campaign was useless.
D helps to "assess the causes" of the increased participation.
Retired Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 511
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 May 2015, 13:00
6
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
First of all, we know there was "a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation." We don't get any info about this, but SOMETHING caused a big increase throughout the state. Now, Lakeview said its huge increase was primarily due not to this SOMETHING (whatever it was) but to their busing program. Are job is to evaluate --- did buses really make the big difference in Lakeview? Or did the same SOMETHING that affected the rest of the state also affect Lakeview, and then, the highly motivated voters just happened to get on buses to get where they wanted to go? That's what we need to decide.

C) Comparing the total number of voters participating when the busing campaign brought them to their neighborhood polling station to the total number of voters participating before the busing campaign.
Well, this would tell us that there was an increase (which we know already), but it would do less to elucidate the reason for the increase. If the busing campaign and the statewide surge in voters happened around the same time (which the argument seems to suggest), then if the increase happened right then, we wouldn't know to which cause to attribute it. Knowing this would not necessarily help us at all. This is not correct.

D) Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.
This is very helpful. Apparently, every town in the state saw an increase in voters, due to the statewide SOMETHING. If Lakeview increased no more than any other town, it wouldn't make sense to give Lakeview's increase a totally different explanation; instead, what caused everyplace else to increase also caused Lakeview to increase. On the other hand, if Lakeview had an increase that was considerably larger than comparable towns, that would call for an explanation that was unique to Lakeview: i.e. the busing campaign. This would be a crucial set of facts to determine. This is the correct answer to the question.
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 317
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2015, 12:39
1
KUDOS
manugmat123 wrote:
Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation, Lakeview's election board claimed that the increased participation in its precinct resulted from the new busing campaign that brought many voters to their neighborhood polling station on Election Day.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?

Determining the average increase in voter participation in each neighborhood of Lakeview.

Using polling data to predict the participation rates for the upcoming election in Lakeview's precinct.

Comparing the total number of voters participating when the busing campaign brought them to their neighborhood polling station to the total number of voters participating before the busing campaign.

Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.

Comparing the long-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter registration patterns with the short-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter participation.

This one is not so easy!!

On re-reading the argument , it becomes clear that there has been a STATE WIDE BOOM in voter registration and participation.
However, the Lakeview's election board thinks that the INCREASED participation and registration has been CAUSED by the BUSING campaign.

Two things happened in Lakeview- STATEWIDE BOOM (General trend all over ) +BUSING, still the election board thinks that BUSING was the cause .

The difference between OTHER STATES and LAKEVIEW is the BUSING campaign.

D makes the comparison with other states and will be useful in knowing was the busing campaign really the cause OR the increased participation was result of a GNERAL TREND -STATEWIDE BOOM.

Hope the above helps!!

I DONOT MIND KUODS!!
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1175
Location: India
Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2016, 11:34
Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation, Lakeview's election board claimed that the increased participation in its precinct resulted from the new busing campaign that brought many voters to their neighborhood polling station on Election Day.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Lakeview's assessment of the causes of the increased voter participation in its precinct?

A. Determining the average increase in voter participation in each neighborhood of Lakeview.............This helps to analyse the result not cause.

B. Using polling data to predict the participation rates for the upcoming election in Lakeview's precinct...........future prediction can help evaluate the election happened in past.

C. Comparing the total number of voters participating when the busing campaign brought them to their neighborhood polling station to the total number of voters participating before the busing campaign.............this can help us but this can be similar to A. Contains info reg data but not the cause.

D. Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.................Looks like we cannot apply scenario of other place to Lakeview. The conditions and circumstances can be different. but this is the only option which speaks sth related to the cause.

E. Comparing the long-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter registration patterns with the short-term impact of the busing campaign on Lakeview's voter participation.OFS
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.

My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 92
Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3.68
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2017, 22:09
WaterFlowsUp wrote:
First of all, we know there was "a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation." We don't get any info about this, but SOMETHING caused a big increase throughout the state. Now, Lakeview said its huge increase was primarily due not to this SOMETHING (whatever it was) but to their busing program. Are job is to evaluate --- did buses really make the big difference in Lakeview? Or did the same SOMETHING that affected the rest of the state also affect Lakeview, and then, the highly motivated voters just happened to get on buses to get where they wanted to go? That's what we need to decide.

C) Comparing the total number of voters participating when the busing campaign brought them to their neighborhood polling station to the total number of voters participating before the busing campaign.
Well, this would tell us that there was an increase (which we know already), but it would do less to elucidate the reason for the increase. If the busing campaign and the statewide surge in voters happened around the same time (which the argument seems to suggest), then if the increase happened right then, we wouldn't know to which cause to attribute it. Knowing this would not necessarily help us at all. This is not correct.

D) Comparing the increase in voter participation in Lakeview to the increase in participation in precincts demographically similar to Lakeview that did not implement busing campaigns.
This is very helpful. Apparently, every town in the state saw an increase in voters, due to the statewide SOMETHING. If Lakeview increased no more than any other town, it wouldn't make sense to give Lakeview's increase a totally different explanation; instead, what caused everyplace else to increase also caused Lakeview to increase. On the other hand, if Lakeview had an increase that was considerably larger than comparable towns, that would call for an explanation that was unique to Lakeview: i.e. the busing campaign. This would be a crucial set of facts to determine. This is the correct answer to the question.

That`s right

"a state-wide boom in voter registration and participation." is the clue for eliminating C.

Thanks
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 87
Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2017, 08:41
suntwin wrote:
Imo c
Before the busing campaign stats wi directly tell us how the busing campaign helped in increased participation.

Option D lacks the direct impact

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2

C only tells you whether there was an increase in voter participation, or rather the magnitude of the increase. C doesn't tell you what caused the increase in voter participation. Knowing the magnitude of the increase doesn't help us in evaluating the claim that the busing campaign caused the increase. It doesn't eliminate possible correlation without causation.

D however does that.

Kudos if you like the answer.
_________________

Give me kudos and see what happens to your GMAT score

Re: Following a state-wide boom in voter registration and partic   [#permalink] 10 Nov 2017, 08:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by