GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jan 2019, 19:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for a high GRE score

     January 17, 2019

     January 17, 2019

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 85
Location: Tu
Schools: Chicago b.
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2009, 07:40
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:06) correct 48% (01:02) wrong based on 386 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
(C) overtime that potentially can cause
(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause

_________________

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do...

Most Helpful Expert Reply
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 334
Location: San Francisco
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2010, 16:25
5
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
PROBLEM: The relative pronoun "that" is opening up a modifier on "overtime" which is problematic from a meaning perspective. What the sentence wants is for the modifier to modify "an excessive amount of overtime", but right now it reads as modifying "overtime". In other words, the sentence sounds like the contracts are working an excessive amount of a SPECIFIC (essential) kind of overtime, the kind that has the potential of causing errors in judgment. This is incorrect. Also, "of" is the wrong idiom with potential.

(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
PROBLEM: Same as above, though it fixed the idiom issue.

(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
PROBLEM: Now we are using an appositive modifier (modifying a noun with a noun "a practice..."), which is clearer. The "practice" is the entire phrase "work(ing) an excessive amount of overtime". Unfortunately, the idiom is correct after "potential" (should be "to").

(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
ANSWER: People don't like picking things with too many commas. BUT COMMAS ARE GREAT! Commas are not bad or wordy. They are how we separate ideas in English. The more commas, often, the better. "potentially" is modifying "can cause", and we often set off modifiers with commas on either side.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 42
Location: Los Angeles
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2009, 15:36
2
IMO this is not a very good question.

In answers A, B, and C it's implied that "overtime" has the potential to cause errors, when logically it needs to be the "practice of overtime" that has the potential to cause errors.

In solution D, "causing" is not parallel to "work"

Answer E is the only solution remaining.

Some might argue that in answer E, the words "can" and "potentially" create a redundancy error. But I suppose all of the other errors are grammatical mistakes, whereas redundancy is more of a stylistic error.


HTH!
_________________

Paul

Focused GMAT Prep
http://www.thegmatbootcamp.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Schools: McIntire, Fuqua, Villanova, Vandy, WashingtonU
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2009, 19:27
GMATBootcamp wrote:
In solution D, "causing" is not parallel to "work"

Please elaborate :)

I got E also, but want to know what's wrong with D.
_________________

12/23 GMATPrep #1: 730 q50 v38
12/26 MGMAT CAT #1: 730 q50 v40
01/01 MGMAT CAT #2: 710 q51 v36
01/12 Real GMAT #1: 690... WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!
...
02/28 Real GMAT #2: ...

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 42
Location: Los Angeles
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2009, 19:52
its preferable to have verbs in the same tense.

Contractors work....this can cause

contractors working...problems causing



HTH!
_________________

Paul

Focused GMAT Prep
http://www.thegmatbootcamp.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2009, 02:30
'C' is wrong because it syas that 'Overtime' causes errors in the judgement. It is the practice of excessive working that causes errors in judgement.

IMO potential for is unidiomatic in D

IMO E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 253
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2009, 06:35
IMO E too.

A,b,c are out because its not overtime that causes ..... its the practice so D,E

in D, potential for is not idiomatic
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 49
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2009, 08:10
IMO B is correct option.
I think by Overtime we do not need to explicitly state that it is a practice.
We are making the sentence more wordy...any comments??
pls correct me...if i ma wrong..

OA pls..
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1084
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2010, 07:26
OA is E.

D is incorrect for wordiness.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 740
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2010, 21:59
1
Clearly the case of resumptive modifier. hence E and D are left. D is unidiomatic. Hence E.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 369
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2010, 02:48
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.


(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

-t

Hi tommy ,
Please Consider the sentence that you have given as an example.
In
1)"He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than
2)"He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."
In sentence 1, potentially is an adverb and needs to modify a verb .There is no verb after potentially in sentence 1
In sentence 2 potentially modifies "is" verb
So how can sentence 1 be better than sentence 2?
I must be missing something.Tommy can you resolve this issue
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Location: india
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2010, 12:19
thanks tommy very well explained..
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 334
Location: San Francisco
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2010, 10:46
2
Hey Munda,

I think the issue you're having is that a modifier should come before the thing it modifies, but this is actually the opposite of the case. Most modifiers come after. For example.

The man in the house. [in the house]
The man running from the law. [running from the law]
The dog, a purebred, is pretty. [a purebred]

See? In general, modifiers come AFTER the thing they modify. This isn't a hard and fast rule or anything (For example "By the time you read this, I'll be gone. [by the time you read this]", but it CERTAINLY doesn't make a sentence wrong if the adverbial modifier comes after the verb/adverb/adjective being modified.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 621
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2010, 12:31
but Tommy what I dnt understand is that when we say overtime, is that not sufficient? Why do I have to clarify the practice? Also in C if the potentially were to be correctly placed would you pass it?

TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
PROBLEM: The relative pronoun "that" is opening up a modifier on "overtime" which is problematic from a meaning perspective. What the sentence wants is for the modifier to modify "an excessive amount of overtime", but right now it reads as modifying "overtime". In other words, the sentence sounds like the contracts are working an excessive amount of a SPECIFIC (essential) kind of overtime, the kind that has the potential of causing errors in judgment. This is incorrect. Also, "of" is the wrong idiom with potential.

(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
PROBLEM: Same as above, though it fixed the idiom issue.

(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
PROBLEM: Now we are using an appositive modifier (modifying a noun with a noun "a practice..."), which is clearer. The "practice" is the entire phrase "work(ing) an excessive amount of overtime". Unfortunately, the idiom is correct after "potential" (should be "to").

(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
ANSWER: People don't like picking things with too many commas. BUT COMMAS ARE GREAT! Commas are not bad or wordy. They are how we separate ideas in English. The more commas, often, the better. "potentially" is modifying "can cause", and we often set off modifiers with commas on either side.

Hope that helps!

-t


Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 334
Location: San Francisco
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2010, 10:10
Hey All,

2 issues. First Mainhoon's.

The problem is that it isn't overtime on its own that is causing problems, it's the practice of WORKING AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT of overtime. This is why we need to add the stuff about practice.

I was also asked a different question by PM, printed here:

With respect to the below sentences
1)"He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than
2)"He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

Can you please tell what is the adverb potentially modifying in sentence 1) and 2)

Really, it's modifying the same thing, but it's a question of how we say it. Consider an adjective use.

I have a green house.
I have a house green.

The second one is just wrong, because we don't write it that way. Technically, I suppose, it's still modifying the "house", but who cares? It's wrong. Sames goes with example 2 up above.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1021
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2010, 09:44
Tommy, can potentially is not redundant?
I think I have read that in Manhattan SC...
Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 334
Location: San Francisco
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2010, 11:31
Hey Noburu,

Well, I'd agree with you, but there's no better choice. Remember, any issue relating to concision/redundancy should be the ABSOLUTE LAST thing you think about on the GMAT. Those issues are always secondary to GRAMMAR and even CLARITY.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Location: India
Schools: Kellogg
WE 1: Engineer
Re: 1000 sc - 300  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2011, 22:10
Option - E is wrong
because 'can potentially' is redundant.

Refer to Q-159, OG-10
--------------------------------------

While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners. whose equity--in many cases representing a life's savings--can plunge or even disappear.
(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose
----
Explanation - "... can potentially is redundant in B and E. ..."
--------------------------------------

Its an OG-10 Solution.

Experts please reply.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 85
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 460 Q38 V17
GPA: 3.56
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2012, 08:29
1
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.
(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
(C) overtime that potentially can cause
(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Please Explain  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2012, 10:53
1
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
Incorrect: "That" modifies overtime, when really "overtime" isn't what causes the error, its the act of working excessive overtime that causes it. It's a little tricky, but the modifier should be modifying the entire clause rather than just the noun. In other news, "potential for" is not the correct idiom.

(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
Incorrect: Proper idiom usage, but again "that" modifies" overtime," which is incorrect

(C) overtime that potentially can cause
Incorrect: Again wrong modifier usage

(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
Incorrect: "Potential for" is not the correct idiom

(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
Correct: Not a great answer because the "potentially" part seems redundant, but it's the best answer
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Please Explain &nbs [#permalink] 18 Apr 2012, 10:53

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.