NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 03:23 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 03:23
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
 1   2   3   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Dmitriy
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 887 [508]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
Send PM
Reviews Badge
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 31 May 2021, 00:55
35
Kudos
468
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:27) correct 48% (01:39) wrong based on 6944 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.


(A) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

(B) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated

(C) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated

(D) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

(E) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere


Show Spoiler
https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/06/arts/columbus-landed-er-looted-uh-rewrite.html

Whether a more human hero or a greedy, violent kook will emerge from all this attention will depend less on a re-examination of Columbus's record than on contemporary judgments about what he wrought. In the furious debate that has anticipated the anniversary, Columbus fans have been almost drowned out by the rising voices of more native Americans and others for whom he has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress. The fight has been joined in the public sector, with accusations that Federal grants were denied to projects that cast Columbus in an unflattering light.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E

Originally posted by Dmitriy on 27 Sep 2013, 09:10.
Last edited by Bunuel on 31 May 2021, 00:55, edited 8 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63651 [157]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   30 Jun 2017, 12:58
88
Kudos
69
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Edit: There are two slightly different versions of this question! The explanation below uses the version that appears in the GMATPrep software as of December 2018.


This question is an irritating exception to the so-called “touch rule” for noun modifiers.

We also covered this example during our YouTube live chat, so if you prefer to get your SC via video, click here. And we also discussed “that” and the “touch rule” in our recent Topic of the Week on “that.”

Full disclosure: I fell asleep at the wheel and totally missed this question the first time I saw it a few years ago. So please be smarter than I was. :D

Quote:
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

This sounds great! “… progress that has decimated native peoples…” Yeah!

Oh, wait. That doesn’t actually make sense. It wasn’t the progress that decimated native peoples – the “devastation and enslavement in the name of progress” was the thing that decimated native peoples. Oops.

Notice that this is a plausible exception to the “touch rule”: the only things separating “that” from “devastation and enslavement” are a pair of prepositional phrases, and it would be awfully tough to separate them from “devastation and enslavement.” So sure, “that has decimated native peoples” could refer back to “devastation and enslavement.”

But there’s a new problem: “devastation and enslavement… has decimated.” Subject-verb error. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated

This one just doesn’t make any sense. The native peoples were decimated; the way (B) is written, it sounds like they decimated somebody else, but we don’t know who. And that doesn’t make sense. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Lots of messy issues here. It’s not ideal to use the gerunds “devastating and enslaving” when we could use the noun forms “devastation and enslavement.” That’s not necessarily an absolute rule, but it’s one strike against (C).

(Also, “in the name of progress” is repeated… but I think that’s a GMAT Club typo, and that error doesn’t appear in the actual question. Oops.)

“Which” is a problem here, too. If the phrase beginning with “which” modifies “Western Hemisphere,” then it’s illogical; if it reaches back to “native peoples of the Western Hemisphere”, then it’s still wrong, because “which” can’t modify people – only things. (C) is gone.

Quote:
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.

Basically, all of the errors in (C) are repeated in (D). So (D) is out, too.

Quote:
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Almost everything we said about (A) applies here too: this looks like a classic exception to the “touch rule.”

The only difference? “Has” in (A) has been changed to “have” in (E). “Devastation and enslavement… have decimated the native peoples.”

So (E) is the best answer, even if you think (A) might sound better. :)

And if anybody is still curious about the article "the" at the beginning of (E): I don't think it's a big deal, but adding "the" helps clarify that Columbus personifies the specific devastation and enslavement that decimated the native peoples, rather than devastation and enslavement in general. But again: that's not a major issue, and not something that should worry you too much.
User avatar
TirthankarP
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 878 [31]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: PGDM (GM) '15 (A)
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   27 Sep 2013, 09:29
25
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Dmitriy wrote:
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
e) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere


This is a very good example of how GMAT tests meaning of a sentence.
By rule we know that, "that" points to the nearest noun (in this case "progress").
But progress can't decimate. It has to be "devastation and enslavement" which decimated the native peoples.

"devastation and enslavement" plural. So E is the correct answer.
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [4]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   17 Dec 2021, 04:24
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Dmitriy wrote:
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.


(A) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

(B) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated

(C) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated

(D) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

(E) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere



Concepts tested here: Subject-Verb Agreement + Tenses + Pronouns + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• Two singular nouns joined by “and” function as one plural noun.
• "that" and "which" cannot be used to refer to human beings.
• The present perfect tense (marked by the use of the helping verb “has/have”) is used to describe events that concluded in the past but continue to affect the present.
• The simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

A: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun phrase "devastation and enslavement" with the singular verb "has decimated"; please remember, two singular nouns joined by “and” function as one plural noun.

B: This answer choice uses the passive voice construction "by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

C: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the noun "peoples" with the pronoun "that"; please remember, "that" and "which" cannot be used to refer to human beings.

D: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the noun "peoples" with the pronoun "which"; please remember, "that" and "which" cannot be used to refer to human beings. Further, Option D incorrectly uses the simple present tense verb "are decimated" to refer to an action that concluded in the past but continues to affect the present; please remember, the present perfect tense (marked by the use of the helping verb “has/have”) is used to describe events that concluded in the past but continue to affect the present, and the simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

E: Correct. This answer choice correctly refers to the plural noun phrase "devastation and enslavement" with the plural verb "have decimated". Further, Option E correctly refers to the non-human noun phrase "devastation and enslavement" with the pronoun "that". Additionally, Option E correctly uses the present perfect tense verb "have decimated" to refer to an action that concluded in the past but continues to affect the present. Besides, Option E is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

Hence, E is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Present Perfect Tense" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):

Show Spoiler


To understand the concept of "Simple Tenses" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



To understand the concept of "And" vs Other Conjunctions on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
igotthis
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 223 [14]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Sustainability, International Business
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   27 Sep 2013, 09:25
8
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
C and D are obviously out.
A - devastation and enslavement... has... decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.: It's Plural
B - Sounds like progress has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
E - Correct! devastation and enslavement... have... decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.:
User avatar
B
kinjiGC
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 797
Own Kudos [?]: 2588 [8]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Tepper '17 (M$) W.P. Carey '17 (A$) NUS '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   14 Jun 2015, 10:07
4
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

Here as per the meaning "Progress cannot devastate the natives" so that should refer to "devastation and enslavement" and hence That should take plural.
Which/that can jump over the essential modifier "in the name of progress" to refer to "devastation and enslavement"

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
That should take plural verb as explained above

b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
Again, by progress native people cannot be decimated so which should refer to "devastation and enslavement".
here, compared to active voice, option B) is not preferred as active voice is more concise and expresses the meaning effectively.

c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
Three issues
1) Instead of gerund (verb+ing) which is a noun form, use the noun form "devastation and enslavement" which is already present. If we don't have a noun form for example eating, we don't have a noun form, we can use "eating".
2) What is those referring to? -> is not clear.
3) "that have" obviously, hemisphere cannot be decimated so that refers to "native peoples". But here, the meaning changes as who devastated is removed.

d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
1) Same issue as that of option C) point 1)
2) Same issue as that of option C) point 2)
3) which refers to ? not clear.

e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
-> Correct
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [8]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   28 Jun 2017, 14:31
5
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
RaguramanS, here are my thoughts on your questions:

1. I think you're asking whether it's normal for a modifier such as "that" to jump over a few words and modify an earlier noun. Yes, this is fine, although we have to make sure that the intended meaning is clear. The GMAT writers are often much less eager to apply strict modifier rules than aspiring SC masters would like them to be!

2. The simple answer is that almost all compound subjects (including "bread and butter/cheese") are plural. The only exception would be when we're describing one thing or process with two elements:

Research and development for the new space station is taking longer than anticipated.
Gin and tonic is a popular drink.

However, unless it's 100% clear that the two things must be considered as one unit, we're not going to see this, so the default should be to make all compound subjects plural.
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63651 [4]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   25 Jan 2019, 12:00
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Manat wrote:
GMATNinja should which always have a comma before it?

Generally speaking, when "which" is the subject of a modifying clause, it will follow a comma. For example, "Dana's toy robot, which was designed by evil scientists, is powered by a nugget of plutonium that she found in a broom closet in a U.S. Army base."

However, if "which" is the object of a prepositional phrase, it won't follow a comma. The weapon in which Dana has placed all of her faith is a toy robot that shoots radioactive lasers out of its head." (In other news, maybe the toy robot industry needs some stronger safety regulations?)

I hope that helps!
User avatar
L
daagh
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   30 Jun 2017, 22:19
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Quote:
e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere


1. It is not the general devastation and (the) enslavement that this topic is talking about. It is the specific aftermaths of the Columbian Occupation that it is referring to. The use of the definite article in 'the devastation' and '(the) enslavement' is justifiable.

2. The prepositional phrase 'in the name of progress' is modifying just enslavement. Therefore, we now have two fallouts namely 1. 'the devastation and 2. (the) enslavement in the name of progress', rendering the whole phrase a compounded plural. Therefore, you may see that the plural verb 'have decimated' stands well.
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4343
Own Kudos [?]: 30781 [3]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   02 Oct 2017, 01:55
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Ashokshiva wrote:
adkikani wrote:
Ashokshiva

Yes correct. Cheers Happy learning !


So should we conclude by saying ''that'' can refer to plural nouns.

There were instances where i have eliminated answer options by using this technique. Now i would have find an another one.!!



Hello Ashokshiva,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)


When that is used a noun modifier, it can refer to a singular as well as a plural noun entity as we saw in the case of the two official sentences that you solved.

When that is used just as a pronoun, then it only refers to a singular noun entity.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
B
Avinash_R1
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [3]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   29 Oct 2018, 10:07
3
Kudos
GMATNinja wrote:
Prateek176 wrote:

GMATNinja

Sir I am not clear with the explanation you provided for option B. Could you elaborate this a little more?


GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated

This one just doesn’t make any sense. The native peoples were decimated; the way (B) is written, it sounds like they decimated somebody else, but we don’t know who. And that doesn’t make sense. Eliminate (B).

Consider a silly example: "After working up a huge appetite on the ski slopes, Charlie decimated the buffet." In this example, some guy named Charlie decimated ("destroyed") the buffet, presumably by eating all of it. "Charlie" is the grammatical subject for the verb "decimated" -- and the poor buffet is the thing that is decimated.

(B) is actually structured the same way: "... native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated." "Native peoples" is the subject, and "decimated" is the verb. The problem is, the sentence never says what, exactly, the "native peoples" decimate. There is no object for the sentence. And logically, the native peoples themselves WERE decimated. They didn't "decimate" anything.

(In in case anybody is wondering, there are apparently two different versions of this question. My explanation was originally attached to a slightly different version of the question than the one that appears at the very beginning of this thread.)

I hope this helps!


sir,

it is not - devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated
rather devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated

in this case it is just written in passive voice. i am not finding any difference between B and E (except one in active voice and the other in passive voice).
is it that active voice to be preferred over passive voice if there are no other reason to eliminate

(or) the usage of article THE. in E, it specifies he has come to personify the devastation and enslavement that decimated native peoples - [more specific]
whereas, in B it is more of generic. [the specific nature is missing]

thanks
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [3]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   30 May 2021, 19:49
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
samgyupsal
A simpler way to cut B (among others) is the absence of "the" at the beginning. Let's take out all the modifiers but the last one and see what we have in B:

Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement by which native peoples have been decimated.

I can say this as a sentence: "Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement." But once I add the modifier ("by which . . . "), it doesn't make sense. It would be like saying "Here is disease which spread through the continent," or "This is car that I bought last year." Without the word "the," it doesn't work to add a specifying modifier after the noun.

In short, if we want Columbus to stand for devastation and enslavement in general, we don't need an article before those words. But if we want to say which devastation and enslavement we are talking about, we need "the" beforehand.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [3]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   31 Aug 2021, 19:28
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Rasalghul853

"That" works very similarly to "who." When it's the subject, it is singular. When it's introducing a modifier, then whatever verb that follows should match with the noun we're modifying.

Singular:
Who is driving the car?
That is my favorite movie.
I spoke to the person who is supervising the renovation.
I want a house that has a pool.

Plural:
I spoke to the people who are supervising the renovation.
I don't like cookies that contain raisins.
User avatar
L
carcass
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4380
Own Kudos [?]: 32864 [2]
Given Kudos: 4453
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   27 Sep 2013, 11:52
2
Kudos
I completely agree with you.

This was pretty tough

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

Now if someone is realy accostumed to SC suddenly figure out that THE is necessary for the economy of the same

Otherwise:

in A we have two things so HAS is not possible because lacks of agreement

in B and C: are ackward

D which is not preceded by comma

in E THE is correct and HAVE agree

Nice question
User avatar
B
PiyushK
Director
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Posts: 611
Own Kudos [?]: 4594 [2]
Given Kudos: 235
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   13 Apr 2014, 01:45
2
Kudos
Which one of the following is correct?
the curry and rice is good for stomach.
the curry and the rice are good for stomach.

The devastation and enslavement have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
The devastation and the enslavement have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
I think both are correct.

Many people asked similar question regarding the cocktail noun in option E, whether article should come or not.

As per my understanding as in curry and rice that is a inseparable noun, which represent a dish, we must consider noun as singular, whereas devastation and enslavement do not represent any one particular thing; they are separable, and we should use plural verb to represent such compound noun action.

Experts kindly share your views as well.
User avatar
B
RaguramanS
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 151 [2]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Rutgers '18 ISB '18 Great Lakes '18 Sloan '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.12
WE:Education (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   27 Jun 2017, 01:04
2
Kudos
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

This is one of the few questions that encounters all the exceptions and intricate nuances of GMAT SC.This question prompts to make quicker choices between have and has and which and that

Meaning
For many historians, CC has been personified as an embodiment of devastation and enslavement. These characters have decimated the people of Western Hemisphere
Here the devastation and enslavement have decimated the people lives not progress

(A) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
SVA error devastation and enslavement are plurals must be followed by plural verb
(B) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
Meaning ambiguity: progress has nothing to do with people's lives.
(C) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
Too many errors SVA error Modifier error and tenses error
(D) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
Modifier and meaning errors Western hemisphere ahs nothing to do with people's lives
(E) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
that modifies the devastation and enslavement Correct


Note:
I have some thoughts about this question. Please clarify me if I am wrong.
1. It's very typical to find a GMAT question in which "that " modifies the far away noun as in this case, though the meaning of the question has the highest precedence than grammar.
2. I the option E "the" is used before devastation and enslavement. if the subject is compound noun such as the bread and cheese or The bread and butter, will it not make much sense to use has instead of have.

Even my grammar tool "Grammarly" suggests has instead of have.
Please clarify my thought process
User avatar
P
DmitryFarber
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   30 Apr 2020, 15:28
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
lakshya14 It depends on what you mean by "the subject." Columbus is the main subject of the sentence, simply because he's the first noun in the sentence that isn't part of a modifier or dependent clause. After the "for many historians" modifier, we have a noun, so that noun (Columbus) has to be the subject. But then Columbus gets a verb:

Columbus HAS come to personify the devastation and enslavement.

From there, we could continue with Columbus as the subject if we linked in another verb with AND. However, what we get instead is a noun modifier introduced by THAT. Any time we follow a noun with THAT, we are modifying the noun. So we can know for sure that "that have decimated" refers to devastation and enslavement.
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [2]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   04 May 2023, 06:25
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
SohiniSengupta wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
Edit: There are two slightly different versions of this question! The explanation below uses the version that appears in the GMATPrep software as of December 2018.


This question is an irritating exception to the so-called “touch rule” for noun modifiers.

We also covered this example during our YouTube live chat, so if you prefer to get your SC via video, click here. And we also discussed “that” and the “touch rule” in our recent Topic of the Week on “that.”

Full disclosure: I fell asleep at the wheel and totally missed this question the first time I saw it a few years ago. So please be smarter than I was. :D

Quote:
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

This sounds great! “… progress that has decimated native peoples…” Yeah!

Oh, wait. That doesn’t actually make sense. It wasn’t the progress that decimated native peoples – the “devastation and enslavement in the name of progress” was the thing that decimated native peoples. Oops.

Notice that this is a plausible exception to the “touch rule”: the only things separating “that” from “devastation and enslavement” are a pair of prepositional phrases, and it would be awfully tough to separate them from “devastation and enslavement.” So sure, “that has decimated native peoples” could refer back to “devastation and enslavement.”

But there’s a new problem: “devastation and enslavement… has decimated.” Subject-verb error. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated

This one just doesn’t make any sense. The native peoples were decimated; the way (B) is written, it sounds like they decimated somebody else, but we don’t know who. And that doesn’t make sense. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Lots of messy issues here. It’s not ideal to use the gerunds “devastating and enslaving” when we could use the noun forms “devastation and enslavement.” That’s not necessarily an absolute rule, but it’s one strike against (C).

(Also, “in the name of progress” is repeated… but I think that’s a GMAT Club typo, and that error doesn’t appear in the actual question. Oops.)

“Which” is a problem here, too. If the phrase beginning with “which” modifies “Western Hemisphere,” then it’s illogical; if it reaches back to “native peoples of the Western Hemisphere”, then it’s still wrong, because “which” can’t modify people – only things. (C) is gone.

Quote:
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.

Basically, all of the errors in (C) are repeated in (D). So (D) is out, too.

Quote:
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Almost everything we said about (A) applies here too: this looks like a classic exception to the “touch rule.”

The only difference? “Has” in (A) has been changed to “have” in (E). “Devastation and enslavement… have decimated the native peoples.”

So (E) is the best answer, even if you think (A) might sound better. :)

And if anybody is still curious about the article "the" at the beginning of (E): I don't think it's a big deal, but adding "the" helps clarify that Columbus personifies the specific devastation and enslavement that decimated the native peoples, rather than devastation and enslavement in general. But again: that's not a major issue, and not something that should worry you too much.


Can anyone clarify that "that" can refer to both singular and plural subject or 2 subjects like "which" does? Somehow it is really stuck in my mind that "that" can't refer to plural subjects. I missed this question in mock due to this preconceived notion. I checked multiple places, didn't get any clear answer. GMATNinja it will be really helpful!


Hello SohiniSengupta,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, as a subject pronoun - a pronoun that takes the place of a noun - "that" is always singular, however, as a demonstrative pronoun - a pronoun used to link a noun with a modifying phrase - "that" can refer to singular and plural nouns.

For example, "The companies that pollute the most are power companies."

Here, "pollute the most" is a modifying phrase that acts upon "companies", and "that" is used to link them.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
L
adkikani
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1238 [1]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   29 Sep 2017, 01:02
1
Kudos
Ashokshiva pikolo2510

I am not an expert, but let me add my two cents.

Quote:
What does ''that'' refer to in option E.


That refers to two nouns devastation and enslavement.

I hope you are aware usage of THAT as a relative pronoun modifer.
A relative pronoun will always start a dependent clause. The relative pronoun may
or may not be the subject of the DC that it starts.

The reason why you might be confused is due to presence of prepositional phrase -
in the name of progress - which modifies above two nouns. It is
perfectly valid for a modifier (that) to jump over a prepositional phrase to
refer back to both above nouns as subject and make sense with plural
verb - have decimated.

As yourself: Is it progress or evastation and enslavement
that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Here is complete sentence structure for you:

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress

that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Subject - Verb pairs are as highlighted

Hope this helps.
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4343
Own Kudos [?]: 30781 [1]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink] New post   29 Sep 2017, 10:48
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
adkikani wrote:
Ashokshiva pikolo2510

I am not an expert, but let me add my two cents.

Quote:
What does ''that'' refer to in option E.


That refers to two nouns devastation and enslavement.

I hope you are aware usage of THAT as a relative pronoun modifer.
A relative pronoun will always start a dependent clause. The relative pronoun may
or may not be the subject of the DC that it starts.

The reason why you might be confused is due to presence of prepositional phrase -
in the name of progress - which modifies above two nouns. It is
perfectly valid for a modifier (that) to jump over a prepositional phrase to
refer back to both above nouns as subject and make sense with plural
verb - have decimated.

As yourself: Is it progress or evastation and enslavement
that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Here is complete sentence structure for you:

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress

that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Subject - Verb pairs are as highlighted

Hope this helps.



Hello Arpit adkikani,

I am so happy and proud to see how well you guided pikolo2510 to resolve his own doubt. Great job there. :thumbup:

However, I would just like to make a correction in your above-mentioned analysis.

Please note that have decimated is the verb for the subject that, NOT for devastation and enslavement.

Yes, the noun modifier that refers to devastation and enslavement. But devastation and enslavement does NOT associate with have decimated as a subject. It is that that does so.

If you remove the that clause from the sentence, you will have to remove the verb have decimated also because the verb cannot exist without its subject.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink]
29 Sep 2017, 10:48
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions