GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Jun 2018, 21:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5176
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 12:57
1
8

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 45: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1749
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 12:58
4
5
This question is an irritating exception to the so-called “touch rule” for noun modifiers.

We also covered this example during our YouTube live chat, so if you prefer to get your SC via video, click here. And we also discussed “that” and the “touch rule” in our recent Topic of the Week on “that.”

Full disclosure: I fell asleep at the wheel and totally missed this question the first time I saw it a few years ago. So please be smarter than I was. :D

Quote:
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

This sounds great! “… progress that has decimated native peoples…” Yeah!

Oh, wait. That doesn’t actually make sense. It wasn’t the progress that decimated native peoples – the “devastation and enslavement in the name of progress” was the thing that decimated native peoples. Oops.

Notice that this is a plausible exception to the “touch rule”: the only things separating “that” from “devastation and enslavement” are a pair of prepositional phrases, and it would be awfully tough to separate them from “devastation and enslavement.” So sure, “that has decimated native peoples” could refer back to “devastation and enslavement.”

But there’s a new problem: “devastation and enslavement… has decimated.” Subject-verb error. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated

This one just doesn’t make any sense. The native peoples were decimated; the way (B) is written, it sounds like they decimated somebody else, but we don’t know who. And that doesn’t make sense. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Lots of messy issues here. It’s not ideal to use the gerunds “devastating and enslaving” when we could use the noun forms “devastation and enslavement.” That’s not necessarily an absolute rule, but it’s one strike against (C).

(Also, “in the name of progress” is repeated… but I think that’s a GMAT Club typo, and that error doesn’t appear in the actual question. Oops.)

“Which” is a problem here, too. If the phrase beginning with “which” modifies “Western Hemisphere,” then it’s illogical; if it reaches back to “native peoples of the Western Hemisphere”, then it’s still wrong, because “which” can’t modify people – only things. (C) is gone.

Quote:
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.

Basically, all of the errors in (C) are repeated in (D). So (D) is out, too.

Quote:
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Almost everything we said about (A) applies here too: this looks like a classic exception to the “touch rule.”

The only difference? “Has” in (A) has been changed to “have” in (E). “Devastation and enslavement… have decimated the native peoples.”

So (E) is the best answer, even if you think (A) might sound better. :)

And if anybody is still curious about the article "the" at the beginning of (E): I don't think it's a big deal, but adding "the" helps clarify that Columbus personifies the specific devastation and enslavement that decimated the native peoples, rather than devastation and enslavement in general. But again: that's not a major issue, and not something that should worry you too much.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 47
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 13:58
My take is E, since we need "devastation and enslavement" after infinite "to personify" which eliminates C and D
by which, sounds awkward, so eliminate B

Real competition sounds between A and E
"progress" can't be cause of decimation of native people, so eliminate A
Hence we are left with E
_________________

I'm just a hiker who is trying to conquer "GMAT Everest" and asking stupid questions!!!

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Dec 2015
Posts: 31
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GMAT 2: 620 Q45 V30
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 01 Jul 2017, 07:16
1
Ok! This was a tricky one. I was torn between Choices (A) and (E) but finally picked Choice (E).

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Understanding the meaning: For many RH, CC has come to personify something. What has he come to personify? 1. Devastation 2. Enslavement in the name of progress. These two things have decimated native peoples of the WH.

Errors: The presence of 'that' is quite ambiguous. Is 'that' modifying progress or Is 'that' modifying the two things CC has come to personify. Let's consider that 'that' was referring to progress. It would mean 'progress has decimated native peoples of the WH' which makes no sense at all. How can progress destroy people? Let's consider that 'that' was referring to devastation and enslavement. Now, this makes sense since devastation can destroy people. For example, the devastation caused by the earthquake killed thousands of people and damaged city property. Makes sense. The tense for 'that' doesn't agree in number with the antecedent so there's a SV number error.

A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated.
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
verb-ing modifier implies that CC devastated and enslaved native peoples. 'those' is a demonstrative pronoun and is unnecessary here.
'which' illogically modifies WH. This choice is a total snoozefest.

D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
'have' agrees in number with its antecedent 'devastation and enslavement'. This is by far the best choice. The article before devastation implies definite devastation rather than general devastation. the second article is understood and is removed because of ellipsis.

IMHO - the sentence might be better off without the article before devastation.
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Looking forward to @GMATNinja's explanation.

Originally posted by swapnak on 30 Jun 2017, 14:04.
Last edited by swapnak on 01 Jul 2017, 07:16, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Posts: 634
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 20:52
swapnak wrote:
Ok! This was a tricky one. I was torn between Choices (A) and (E) but finally picked Choice (E).

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Understanding the meaning: For many RH, CC has come to personify something. What has he come to personify? 1. Devastation 2. Enslavement in the name of progress. These two things have decimated native peoples of the WH.

Errors: The presence of 'that' is quite ambiguous. Is 'that' modifying progress or Is 'that' modifying the two things CC has come to personify. Let's consider that 'that' was referring to progress. It would mean 'progress has decimated native peoples of the WH' which makes no sense at all. How can progress destroy people? Let's consider that 'that' was referring to devastation and enslavement. Now, this makes sense since devastation can destroy people. For example, the devastation caused by the earthquake killed thousands of people and damaged city property. Makes sense. The tense for 'that' doesn't agree in number with the antecedent so there's a SV number error.

A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated.
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
verb-ing modifier implies that CC devastated and enslaved native peoples. 'those' is a demonstrative pronoun and is unnecessary here.
'which' illogically modifies WH. This choice is a total snoozefest.

D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
'have' agrees in number with its antecedent 'devastation and enslavement'. not sure why there's an article before 'devastation' and why there's no article before 'enslavement', but this is by far the best choice. it's possible that the second article is understood and is removed because of ellipsis.

IMHO - the sentence might be better off without the article before devastation.
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Looking forward to @GMATNinja's explanation.


E for me as well.. Still confused about "The" in E
_________________

We must try to achieve the best within us


Thanks
Luckisnoexcuse

Expert Post
Top Contributor
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 22:19
1
Top Contributor
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Quote:
e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere


1. It is not the general devastation and (the) enslavement that this topic is talking about. It is the specific aftermaths of the Columbian Occupation that it is referring to. The use of the definite article in 'the devastation' and '(the) enslavement' is justifiable.

2. The prepositional phrase 'in the name of progress' is modifying just enslavement. Therefore, we now have two fallouts namely 1. 'the devastation and 2. (the) enslavement in the name of progress', rendering the whole phrase a compounded plural. Therefore, you may see that the plural verb 'have decimated' stands well.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 53
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 23:43
daagh wrote:
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

a) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
b) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
c) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
d) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

Quote:
e) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere


1. It is not the general devastation and (the) enslavement that this topic is talking about. It is the specific aftermaths of the Columbian Occupation that it is referring to. The use of the definite article in 'the devastation' and '(the) enslavement' is justifiable.

2. The prepositional phrase 'in the name of progress' is modifying just enslavement. Therefore, we now have two fallouts namely 1. 'the devastation and 2. (the) enslavement in the name of progress', rendering the whole phrase a compounded plural. Therefore, you may see that the plural verb 'have decimated' stands well.



Thanks :-D
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1160
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2017, 04:15
Imo E
We need the before the devastation because it points to a particular characteristic that Christopher Columbus has come to personify.
The subject is plural so we need plural verb so E is the answer
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 707
Premium Member
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2017, 06:09
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Apr 2017
Posts: 48
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: General Management (Education)
Reviews Badge
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2017, 10:08
Hi. This seems a really difficult question and no answer on the forum seems to completely explain this.
Could you please help? This question is from GMAT Prep software. I would otherwise not waste your time. But this is an official question.
Expert Post
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1749
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2017, 10:36
mynamegoeson wrote:
E for me as well.. Still confused about "The" in E

Added some comments on "the" in the explanation above. Just let me know if you still have doubts!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 10
Schools: LBS '19
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 08:30
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

A) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
C) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
D) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
E) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

Anybody to explain the answer choice please ?
PS Forum Moderator
avatar
D
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 1141
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 08:36
Hi bbb789

almost all official questions have already been discussed in relevant forums. kindly search the questions for detailed discussions. I am sure your doubts will be cleared if you read through the discussions.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 53
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2017, 20:58
GMATNinja wrote:
mynamegoeson wrote:
E for me as well.. Still confused about "The" in E

Added some comments on "the" in the explanation above. Just let me know if you still have doubts!


What does ''that'' refer to in option E.

If ''that'' refers to ''progress'' shouldn't the verb ''has'' be used.

can ''that'' (singular) refer to ''devastation & enslavement''(plural).

Kindly explain where i am going wrong..

Thanks
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1749
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2017, 08:19
1
Ashokshiva wrote:

What does ''that'' refer to in option E.

If ''that'' refers to ''progress'' shouldn't the verb ''has'' be used.

can ''that'' (singular) refer to ''devastation & enslavement''(plural).

Kindly explain where i am going wrong..

Thanks

Please see the explanation of answer choices A & E above: https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-many-rev ... l#p1879769
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 393
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2017, 23:48
GMATNinja wrote:
Ashokshiva wrote:

What does ''that'' refer to in option E.

If ''that'' refers to ''progress'' shouldn't the verb ''has'' be used.

can ''that'' (singular) refer to ''devastation & enslavement''(plural).

Kindly explain where i am going wrong..

Thanks

Please see the explanation of answer choices A & E above: https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-many-rev ... l#p1879769


Hey GMATNinja

Apologies, but in your explanation above, I can't find where you have written about the usage of that(singular) referring to plural noun. Can you please shed some light on this? According to me, that is singular so it should refer back to a singular subject, but in this sentence it is referring to a plural subject
_________________

My journey From 410 to 700 :-)
Here's my experience when I faced a glitch in my GMAT Exam
Don't do this mistake when you give your GMATPrep Mock!

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1017
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 01:02
Ashokshiva pikolo2510

I am not an expert, but let me add my two cents.

Quote:
What does ''that'' refer to in option E.


That refers to two nouns devastation and enslavement.

I hope you are aware usage of THAT as a relative pronoun modifer.
A relative pronoun will always start a dependent clause. The relative pronoun may
or may not be the subject of the DC that it starts.

The reason why you might be confused is due to presence of prepositional phrase -
in the name of progress - which modifies above two nouns. It is
perfectly valid for a modifier (that) to jump over a prepositional phrase to
refer back to both above nouns as subject and make sense with plural
verb - have decimated.

As yourself: Is it progress or evastation and enslavement
that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Here is complete sentence structure for you:

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress

that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Subject - Verb pairs are as highlighted

Hope this helps.
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 393
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 04:27
adkikani wrote:
Ashokshiva pikolo2510

I am not an expert, but let me add my two cents.

Quote:
What does ''that'' refer to in option E.


That refers to two nouns devastation and enslavement.

I hope you are aware usage of THAT as a relative pronoun modifer.
A relative pronoun will always start a dependent clause. The relative pronoun may
or may not be the subject of the DC that it starts.

The reason why you might be confused is due to presence of prepositional phrase -
in the name of progress - which modifies above two nouns. It is
perfectly valid for a modifier (that) to jump over a prepositional phrase to
refer back to both above nouns as subject and make sense with plural
verb - have decimated.

As yourself: Is it progress or evastation and enslavement
that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Here is complete sentence structure for you:

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress

that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

Subject - Verb pairs are as highlighted

Hope this helps.


Hey

Thanks for your feedback
I do understand "that" is modifying devastation and enslavement, but my question is?

Can "that" modify a plural subject i.e. "devastation and enslavement" ? Till now I thought that only modifies "singular" subjects. Please correct me if I am wrong

GMATNinja please help :-)
_________________

My journey From 410 to 700 :-)
Here's my experience when I faced a glitch in my GMAT Exam
Don't do this mistake when you give your GMATPrep Mock!

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1017
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 05:47
1
pikolo2510

Quote:
Can "that" modify a plural subject i.e. "devastation and enslavement" ? Till now I thought that only modifies "singular" subjects. Please correct me if I am wrong


Try this question and
let me know what is subject for verb - orbit and what does THAT refer to?

Your answer will reply to your queries. :-)
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 393
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2017, 10:10
adkikani wrote:
pikolo2510

Quote:
Can "that" modify a plural subject i.e. "devastation and enslavement" ? Till now I thought that only modifies "singular" subjects. Please correct me if I am wrong


Try this question and
let me know what is subject for verb - orbit and what does THAT refer to?

Your answer will reply to your queries. :-)


Thanks a ton buddy!

+1
_________________

My journey From 410 to 700 :-)
Here's my experience when I faced a glitch in my GMAT Exam
Don't do this mistake when you give your GMATPrep Mock!

Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers   [#permalink] 29 Sep 2017, 10:10

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.