Last visit was: 05 Dec 2024, 00:56 It is currently 05 Dec 2024, 00:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vksunder
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Last visit: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
2,992
 [38]
Posts: 203
Kudos: 2,992
 [38]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 04 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,147
Own Kudos:
66,003
 [8]
Given Kudos: 1,869
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,147
Kudos: 66,003
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 04 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,147
Own Kudos:
66,003
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1,869
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,147
Kudos: 66,003
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
bvbouba
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 May 2011
Last visit: 07 May 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
10
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V32
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For a 1 paragraph passage, you should scan the passage for structural words/phrases. Here, However divides the passage into 2 opposite parts.

1) capitalism was accepted w/o challenges
progessive historian: don't question widespread acceptance of cap
L.H: similar view

2) However, some scholars: cap not accepted w/o struggle
clash w religion + comm
User avatar
gmatter0913
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
1,263
 [2]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,263
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States

The passage is not doing any of the above bolded.
So the answer is the only remaining option D.
D is in the ballpark, where when u read u may not feel this is the answer, but as you eliminate you become more confident.
avatar
toprasadcp
Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Last visit: 11 Sep 2016
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 3
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatter0913
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States

The passage is not doing any of the above bolded.
So the answer is the only remaining option D.
D is in the ballpark, where when u read u may not feel this is the answer, but as you eliminate you become more confident.

I am confused between B and D. Can anyone explain why is B incorrect? Is the passage not competitive arguments 1) Where it says capitalism didn't face any serious challenge ( veiw
endorsed by progressive historians ) and other where recently some scholars have found that laissez-faire was not accepted without struggle.
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,419
Own Kudos:
4,723
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,419
Kudos: 4,723
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to

Initially the passage states that the development of capitalism had not faced serious challenges. The passage then goes about refuting this view by explaining the difficulties encountered in the development of capitalism.

Answer: D

2) According to the passage, the Progressive historians and the scholars mentioned in the highlighted texts disagree with regard to which of the following?

Refer: "progressive historians sympathized with the battles waged by farmers and small producers against large capitalists in the late nineteenth century, but they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history."
"some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century America, it was not accepted without struggle"

Answer: E

3) The passage suggests that the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text would agree with which of the following statements regarding the “norms” mentioned in the subsequent highlighted text?

The word 'norms' can be replaced by the word 'struggles'. The struggles that persisted long after the American Revolution helped in the development of capitalism.

Answer: A
User avatar
AndreiGMAT
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Last visit: 03 Sep 2016
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
98
 [3]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 1: 530 Q46 V19
GPA: 3.45
WE:Asset Management (Real Estate)
GMAT 1: 530 Q46 V19
Posts: 15
Kudos: 98
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
toprasadcp
gmatter0913
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States

The passage is not doing any of the above bolded.
So the answer is the only remaining option D.
D is in the ballpark, where when u read u may not feel this is the answer, but as you eliminate you become more confident.

I am confused between B and D. Can anyone explain why is B incorrect? Is the passage not competitive arguments 1) Where it says capitalism didn't face any serious challenge ( veiw
endorsed by progressive historians ) and other where recently some scholars have found that laissez-faire was not accepted without struggle.

RC is tough for me. I spend 11 minutes on reading the passage and answering the questions. After that, I used the dictionary to look up for the challenging words and read the passage second time.

Back to your question, regarding B and D:

First, let's summarize the content of the passage.
For many years, historians thought that the development of capitalism had not faced serious challenges in the United States - here is the argument with a prevailing belief of historians that road to capitalist was easy.

But then, some scholars argue that development of capitalist was not easy, rather it experienced serious challenges:
- was not accepted without struggle
- even in the late nineteenth century ... laissez-faire had not triumphed completely

In other words, some folks thought that path to capitalism was easy, but the other folks disagreed and refuted the argument providing examples in the second part of the passage.
So what is the author doing in the passage?

B: Is the author combining/synthesizing the arguments from scholars? No. In the passage the competing arguments are contrasted, rather than synthesized. Think about it this way. The second argument totally denies the first argument, thus the two arguments cannot coexist. Hence, the arguments are not synthesized.

D: Is the author summarizing a scholarly refutation? Yes. The passage talks about the two schools, and the second school denies the argument of the first school. Furthermore, The second part of the passage is filled with evidences to support the claim of the second school and thus refute the argument of the first school. Hence, the main idea of the passage is to refute the argument.

Just my opinion.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,079
Own Kudos:
9,280
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,079
Kudos: 9,280
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took 6 mins 30 seconds , including 2 mins 15 seconds to read
-The author talks about how certain views by historians were probably not entirely valid
- He then talks about the work of some workers who have refuted the views of the historians

1. Answer D

2. "Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century America, it was not accepted without struggle"
Answer E

3."Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms"
Answer A
avatar
askul2389
Joined: 16 Oct 2015
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 520 Q44 V17
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.45
WE:Research (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why option B is wrong in 1st question (Primary purpose of passage) ?
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,419
Own Kudos:
4,723
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,419
Kudos: 4,723
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
askul2389
Why option B is wrong in 1st question (Primary purpose of passage) ?

There are 3 arguments --> 1) Progressive historians 2) Louis Hartz 3) Some scholars

The scholars don't synthesize the arguments of Progressive historians and Louis Hartz.

Rather, the scholars oppose the arguments made by the Prog. historians and Louis Hartz regarding the development of Laize Faire Capitalism.

Hence the answer is D and not B.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
mihir0710
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Last visit: 23 Jan 2023
Posts: 473
Own Kudos:
965
 [1]
Given Kudos: 206
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.65
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 473
Kudos: 965
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vksunder
For many years, historians thought that the development of capitalism had not faced serious challenges in the UnitedStates. Writing in the early twentieth cen- tury, Progressive historians sympathized with the battles waged by farmers and small producers against large capitalists in the late nineteenth century, but they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history. Similarly, Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed with the Progressives, argued that Americans accepted laissez-faire capitalism without challenge because they lacked a feudal, precapitalist past. [highlight]Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century America, it was not accepted without struggle. [/highlight]Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess. Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism. These scholars argue that even in the late nineteenth century, with the government's role in the economy considerably diminished, laissez-faire had not triumphed completely.[color=#ff0000][/color] Hard times continued to revive popular demands for regulating business and softening the harsh edges of laissez-faire capitalism.
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q12:The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q13:According to the passage, the Progressive historians mentioned in line 5 and the scholars
mentioned in line 17 disagree with regard to which of the following?
A. Whether laissez-faire became the predominant ethos in the nineteenth-century
United States
B. Whether moral restraints on acquisitiveness were necessary in the nineteencentury
United States
C. The economic utility of mercantilist notions of government
D. The nature of the historical conditions necessary for the development of laissezfaire
capitalism in the nineteen-century United States
E. The existence of significant opposition to the development of laissez-faire
capitalism in the nineteen-century United States


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q14:
The passage suggests that the scholars mentioned in line 17 would agree with which of
the following statements regarding the “norms” mentioned in line 23?
A. They provided a primary source of opposition to the development of laissez-faire
capitalism in the United States in the nineteenth century.
B. Their appeal was undermined by difficult economic times in the United States at
the end of the nineteenth century.
C. They disappeared in the United States in the late nineteenth century because of
the triumph of laissez-faire capitalism.
D. They facilitated the successful implementation of mercantilist notions of
government in the United States in the nineteenth-century.
E. They are now recognized by historians as having been an important part of the
ideology of the American Revolution.




GMAT does NOT feature such short passages and easy questions these days ...

Answers :
1. D : refer to the yellow highlighted text ...
2. E : Refer to the underlined text in the passage ...
3. A : Refer red italic text in the passage ...
User avatar
MadaraU
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Last visit: 27 Jun 2018
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 319
Posts: 33
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone please explain how come answer to 2nd question is E. Clearly scholars agreed that " it was not accepted without a struggle".

"Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century America, it was not accepted without struggle"
avatar
Boomshockalocka
Joined: 07 May 2018
Last visit: 28 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Location: United States
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.69
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Hi GMATNinja, could you please help explain Q1 and Q3?

In Q1, the passage presented two contrasted arguments. How can the primary purpose be "summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument"? And when faced with this type of questions, eg. the passages discussed two competing arguments, how should I determine whether the primary purpose of the passage is to contrast the two arguments or to present the second argument?

In Q3 Choice A, the scholars only used the "norms" as evidence to refute the previous argument but didn't indicate that the "norms" are the primary source. Could you please explain this why A is correct and D is not?

With much appreciation!
User avatar
robu1
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Apr 2021
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 214
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
Posts: 95
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatter0913
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States

The passage is not doing any of the above bolded.
So the answer is the only remaining option D.
D is in the ballpark, where when u read u may not feel this is the answer, but as you eliminate you become more confident.


what is the actual interpretation of Option B :B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States.
avatar
deddex
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Last visit: 29 Dec 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 620
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20 NUS '21
GMAT 1: 420 Q26 V13
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
Schools: ISB '20 NUS '21
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
Posts: 48
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
robu1
gmatter0913
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. reveal the underlying similarities of certain arguments regarding the development
of capitalism in the United States
B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States
C. defend an established argument regarding the development of capitalism in the
United States
D. summarize a scholarly refutation of an argument regarding the development of
capitalism in the United States
E. discuss a new methodology for the study of the development of capitalism in the
United States

The passage is not doing any of the above bolded.
So the answer is the only remaining option D.
D is in the ballpark, where when u read u may not feel this is the answer, but as you eliminate you become more confident.


what is the actual interpretation of Option B :B. synthesize two competing arguments regarding the development of capitalism in
the United States.

Even I had chosen B earlier, so synthesize means to mix or combine (apart from the chemical meaning of synthesis)

The author doesn't combine the P - Historians & Scholars beliefs / instead he tries to say one opposes the other
Hence D is the correct answer choice here.
Attachments

synthesize.jpg
synthesize.jpg [ 36.61 KiB | Viewed 22535 times ]

avatar
willacethis
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.98
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44 (Online)
Posts: 96
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo egmat

In question 3, how do we figure out that the norms are the "primary" source of opposition?

Thanks!
User avatar
jawele
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 14 Oct 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
134
 [2]
Given Kudos: 658
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 127
Kudos: 134
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aalakshaya
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo egmat

In question 3, how do we figure out that the norms are the "primary" source of opposition?

Thanks!

Hi

I'll start with the relevant part of the text:

"<...>, however, some scholars have argued that <...> , it [capitalism] was not accepted without struggle. <...> capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms"

The first sentence in my quotation is the main claim of the scholars who argue against long held ideas about capitalism. The second sentence is the main evidence of those scholars to support their stance. From this "structure" we can infer that this is the "primary" source of opposition. But you can also look from a different angle, it's actually one reasonable explanation that those scholars employ to bolster their case. So there isn't anything else to reasonably hold on to in order to treat something else as opposition.

I hope this helps
User avatar
vikhyathsuvarna
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt in the second question. I am not able to understand what does it mean. Does it mean that "Progressive Historians" and "Scholars" both disagree about something or does it mean that "Progressive Historians" disagree with "Scholars" about something.
User avatar
vikhyathsuvarna
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have doubt in the second question. What does it really mean? Does it mean that "Progressive Historians" and "Scholars" both disagree on something or Does it mean that "Progressive Historians" disagree with "Scholars" on something.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7147 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14124 posts