It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 04:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 42 [5], given: 0

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2009, 06:31
5
KUDOS
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:05) correct 39% (01:20) wrong based on 1523 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

(A) After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products.

(B) The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.

(C) Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.

(D) In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.

(E) After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I cannot get my head round the reasonings of the OA. No matter how I look at it, D seems the best answer. If D is true, wouldn’t per capita expenditure of drugs increase?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 11 Jul 2017, 01:02, edited 2 times in total.
GMAT prep Q. OA updated

Kudos [?]: 42 [5], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 221

Kudos [?]: 141 [5], given: 13

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2009, 11:29
5
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I would go with A.

Although manufacturers did not increase price of their existing products, but they replaced existing ones with new medications, which cost more. Even though there is no expansion in use of prescription drugs, still per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

In D, if doctor’s prescribe generic drugs which are cheaper than expensive brand-names then how would it justify the increase in per capita expenditure for prescription drugs. It will in fact decrease per capita expenditure for prescription drugs.

Kudos [?]: 141 [5], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 54 [3], given: 1

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2009, 11:34
3
KUDOS
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products - this has no effect on per capita expenditure

B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - this would decrease per capita expenditure

C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. - nothing to do with increase in per capita expenditure

D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions
- people would have started to buy less expensive generic medicine and per capita expenditure would have gone done, therfore government's action would have worked. BUt the q is why government's action didn't work.

E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - as the usage of prescription drug didn't change, people would have started to buy these drugs outside voronia and pay additional shipping costs eventually rising the per capita expenditure. So the governmet's action didn't work.

Whats OA ?

Kudos [?]: 54 [3], given: 1

Manager
Status: Applying
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 16 [1], given: 6

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.65
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2009, 20:56
1
KUDOS
IMO A..

If the Gov froze the prices only for certain drug then this holds....

Kudos [?]: 16 [1], given: 6

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 807

Kudos [?]: 383 [1], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2009, 00:32
1
KUDOS
A for me.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 383 [1], given: 106

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 00:11
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - per capita comparision so doesnt make a difference
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. -- talking abt expenditure and not profit
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions - how does this explain the rise in per capita.
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - out of scope

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 02:26
I will vote for E.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 03:18
IMO...E, according to learner's explanation.

'A' would have been the answer if it was stated that the new medicines are more expensive than those currently existing in the market. 'B' and 'D' would decrease the per capita expenditure, and c is irrelevant, leaving us with 'E'. However, 'E' needs too much assumptions.

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 06:44
OA is A...

Can't believe we are bullied into taking A as an answer...

It's not convincing (to me at least)...

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 19:18
What is the source? I am also not convinced with 'A' being the answer.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 21:19

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 807

Kudos [?]: 383 [1], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2009, 01:02
1
KUDOS
getMBA already gave nice explanation for A.

Total drugss sold same.
per capita increased ==> cost of drugs increased
price of old drugs, drugs already existed in the market, not increased

How is that possible? New drugs have the higher prices than older ones reulting in per-capita expense on drugs to increase.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 383 [1], given: 106

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2009, 02:05
Nowhere it was specifically mentioned that the new drugs will be more expensive....so I was confused with A.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2009, 13:45
eresh wrote:
Nowhere it was specifically mentioned that the new drugs will be more expensive....so I was confused with A.

In fact, is not necessary that the new drugs are more expensive. What it matters here is that are new drugs--> more expenditure.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 125

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 60

Location: Ukraine, Kyiv
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 11:16
Quite a challenging question.

I picked initially D, but when saw the OA was very confused.

good reasoning is provided by MGMAT staff here:

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/for ... t2413.html
_________________

Never, never, never give up

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 60

Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 247

Kudos [?]: 447 [0], given: 3

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 09:42
Would go with A..

Kudos [?]: 447 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2009, 17:08
I would go with A as well.

As far as your reasoning is concerned 'stopping to market' doest not necessarily mean 'stopping to sell'

learner wrote:
A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products - this has no effect on per capita expenditure

B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period - this would decrease per capita expenditure

C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze. - nothing to do with increase in per capita expenditure

D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions
- people would have started to buy less expensive generic medicine and per capita expenditure would have gone done, therfore government's action would have worked. BUt the q is why government's action didn't work.

E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia. - as the usage of prescription drug didn't change, people would have started to buy these drugs outside voronia and pay additional shipping costs eventually rising the per capita expenditure. So the governmet's action didn't work.

Whats OA ?

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2010
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 2 [2], given: 31

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 04:43
2
KUDOS
A it is

This was an easy one but others are really hard.
CR is the most difficult in verbal
i get only 40% correct answers.

Kudos [?]: 2 [2], given: 31

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 05:27
A it is

This was an easy one but others are really hard.
CR is the most difficult in verbal
i get only 40% correct answers.

Best of luck for tomorrow!

Keep us informed!
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 107 [2], given: 20

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 08:02
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sly:)... they found the loophole.

Law says: you can't increase the price.

Businessman: ok. I will manufacture a new product (with slight changes) and put it in the market and charge a high price to begin with - then the price ceiling can't stop me from charging the price I want.

Kudos [?]: 107 [2], given: 20

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor   [#permalink] 14 Nov 2010, 08:02

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 79 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by