GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 03 Apr 2020, 15:38

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62496
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2015, 23:55
2
14
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (02:20) correct 52% (02:18) wrong based on 263 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

_________________
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 115
Schools: HBS '18, IIMA
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2015, 01:13
5
1
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

Solution -

Its given that, (m – r) > (s – n), which is equivalent to (m + n) > (r + s). So we need to determine the inequality holds true or false.

Stmt1 - 250 > r + s --> From the question m + n = 250, so the inequality m + n > r + s is true. Sufficient.

Stmt2 - m + r + s = 375 --> We know that m + n = 250 and m > n, m must be greater than 125. Subtracting 125 from 375 yields 250, so if m is greater than 125, then r + s must be smaller than 250. So the inequality m + n > r + s is true. Sufficient.
ANS D
General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62496
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2015, 11:49
1
1
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

800score Official Solution:

Statement (1) tells us that 250 > r + s. Since the question statement tells us that m + n = 250, we can determine that m + n > r + s.

Now, let us manipulate this inequality to see whether it is equivalent to the inequality in the question:
(m + n) > (r + s)
m > (r + s) – n
(m – r) > (s – n)

This is exactly what we were looking for. We can answer the question using Statement (1), hence it is sufficient.

Statement (2) tells us that m + r + s = 375.
Because we know that m + n = 250 and m > n, m must be greater than 125. Subtracting 125 from 375 yields 250, so if m is greater than 125, then r + s must be smaller than 250. We are now left with the same inequality that we were given in Statement (1), which can be manipulated to show that (m – r) > (s – n). So Statement (2) is also sufficient.

Since both statements are sufficient alone, the correct answer is choice (D).
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62496
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Sep 2016, 03:25
1
1
DaenerysStormborn wrote:
Hello Bunuel,

I have a doubt. Please help me see what am I missing...

m, n, r, and s are integers-> nowhere it's mentioned that it is positive integer, it can as well be negative integer... in that case how can we reduce the equation (m – r) > (s – n) into (m + n) > (r + s)

thanks

Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

800score Official Solution:

Statement (1) tells us that 250 > r + s. Since the question statement tells us that m + n = 250, we can determine that m + n > r + s.

Now, let us manipulate this inequality to see whether it is equivalent to the inequality in the question:
(m + n) > (r + s)
m > (r + s) – n
(m – r) > (s – n)

This is exactly what we were looking for. We can answer the question using Statement (1), hence it is sufficient.

Statement (2) tells us that m + r + s = 375.
Because we know that m + n = 250 and m > n, m must be greater than 125. Subtracting 125 from 375 yields 250, so if m is greater than 125, then r + s must be smaller than 250. We are now left with the same inequality that we were given in Statement (1), which can be manipulated to show that (m – r) > (s – n). So Statement (2) is also sufficient.

Since both statements are sufficient alone, the correct answer is choice (D).

We are concerned about the sign of a number when multiplying/dividing an inequality by that number. However we can safely add/subtract a number from both sides of an inequality, which is done in that example: add n+r to both sides of (m – r) > (s – n) to get (m + n) > (r + s).

Hope it's clear.
_________________
CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2542
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2015, 02:59
1
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

Given, m>n, m+n=250

Question: is (m – r) > (s – n)? or is (m+n)>(s+r) ---> s+r<250 ?

Statement 1 , sufficient to say yes fr s+r<250.

Statement 2, m+r+s=375 ---> assuming (m – r) > (s – n) ---> m+n>375-m ---> 2m+n>375 or n >375-2m and n = 250-m

Thus, 250-m > 375-2m --- m >125

Thus, if m+n = 250 and m >125 ---> m>n which is a give. Thus our assumption above of (m – r) > (s – n) holds TRUE. Thus this statement is sufficient as well.

D is the correct answer.
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 45
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2015, 06:44
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

given: m+n = 250 & m>n, hence n<125 & m>125

Asked: is (m-r)>(s-n), rearranging we get, is (m+n)>(s+r) ?

stmt1 : 250>r+s -->250 = m+n, hence m+n > r+s , sufficient

stmt2 : m+r+s = 375 -->r+s = 375-m, but m>125...so smallest possible value of m is 126 (m is given as integer)

so, r+s = 375-126 = 249 (this is max value of r+s) hence r+s is always equal to or less than 249 & m+n is 250 -->m+n > r+s....sufficient

Ans. D
_________________
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. - Thomas A. Edison
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 11 Sep 2015
Posts: 4579
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V46
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2016, 13:25
Top Contributor
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

Target question: Is (m - r) > (s - n)?

This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question. We have a video on this at the bottom of this post

If we take the inequality in the target question and add r and n to both sides, we get . . .
REPHRASED target question: Is (m + n) > (s + r)?

Since m + n = 250, we can also rephrase it this way . . .
REPHRASED target question: Is 250 > (s + r)?

Given Information: m + n = 250 and m > n
If m and n were EQUAL, then m and n would both equal 125
Since m is GREATER THAN n, we can conclude that m > 125

Statement 1: 250 > r + s
Perfect!
One of our REPHRASED target questions is Is 250 > (s + r)?
Since statement 1 allows us to answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, it is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: m + r + s = 375
Earlier (in the Given Information part of the solution), we determined that m > 125
So, we can reword statement 2 as: (a number bigger than 125) + (r + s) = 375
This means that (r + s) must be LESS THAN 250
In other words, 250 > (s + r)
One of our REPHRASED target questions is Is 250 > (s + r)?
Since statement 2 allows us to answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, it is SUFFICIENT

RELATED VIDEOS

_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 53
GMAT 1: 460 Q32 V22
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2016, 03:21
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

From the question stem we have to prove that s+r< 250
1. SUFFICIENT
2. m+r+s =375, m+n= 250 i.e. r+s=125+n, now it is given that m > n. So maximum value of n can be 124. Hence we use n=124 r+s would be 249 <250.
Hence SUFFICIENT
Correct answer is D.
Intern
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 30
Location: India
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2016, 13:07
Hello Bunuel,

I have a doubt. Please help me see what am I missing...

m, n, r, and s are integers-> nowhere it's mentioned that it is positive integer, it can as well be negative integer... in that case how can we reduce the equation (m – r) > (s – n) into (m + n) > (r + s)

thanks

Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

800score Official Solution:

Statement (1) tells us that 250 > r + s. Since the question statement tells us that m + n = 250, we can determine that m + n > r + s.

Now, let us manipulate this inequality to see whether it is equivalent to the inequality in the question:
(m + n) > (r + s)
m > (r + s) – n
(m – r) > (s – n)

This is exactly what we were looking for. We can answer the question using Statement (1), hence it is sufficient.

Statement (2) tells us that m + r + s = 375.
Because we know that m + n = 250 and m > n, m must be greater than 125. Subtracting 125 from 375 yields 250, so if m is greater than 125, then r + s must be smaller than 250. We are now left with the same inequality that we were given in Statement (1), which can be manipulated to show that (m – r) > (s – n). So Statement (2) is also sufficient.

Since both statements are sufficient alone, the correct answer is choice (D).

_________________
When you are grateful - when you can see what you have - you unlock blessings to flow in your life
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Business Development (Computer Software)
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Oct 2016, 20:42
Bunuel wrote:
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s = 375

Kudos for a correct solution.

To prove : m-r > s-n => m-r+n > s => m+n > s+r => 250 > s+r or s+r < 250
Also from the question stem m+n = 250 , m > n
so maximum value for n can be 124 and minimum value of m can be 126

1. 250 > r+s ...... sufficient
2. m + r + s = 375
r + s = 375 - m

lets take minimum value of m ie 126 as this will give us maximum value of r+s

r + s = 375 - 126 => r + s = 249 => r + s < 250
This is also sufficient

So answer is D
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 May 2018
Posts: 683
Location: Pakistan
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Oct 2018, 04:32
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r) > (s – n)?

(1) 250 > r + s

Rewriting $$m-r > s-n$$

$$m+n > s+r$$

We know that m + n = 250

Thus, $$250 > s+r$$

SUFFICIENT

(2) m + r + s = 375

$$m+n=250$$ and $$m>n$$, we know that m is greater than 125.

$$375-125=250[/b] As m is greater than 125, [m]r+s$$ has to be less than 250

Inequality stands true

SUFFICIENT.

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14464
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Oct 2019, 03:18
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2019, 03:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m – r)

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne