Bunuel wrote:
For years, a considerable number of students on West County High School's track team complained about shin splints (medial tibial syndrome). However, during the most recent season, the number of students who complained about shin splints dropped significantly. School officials assert that this reduction in complaints occurred entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface, which absorbed much of the shock on the knees and shins that occurs when running and causes shin splints.
Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the school officials' explanation for the decrease in complaints about shin splints?
(A) As a result of West County High School's adoption of better medical staff and new medical scanning devices, many students whose complaints would have been diagnosed in years past as an instance of shin splints are now diagnosed with a different condition.
(B) West County High School built its track after a number of neighboring schools with similar track teams built new tracks and each school saw the number of complaints about shin splints drop.
(C) This past season, members of West County High School's track team received and wore new and highly acclaimed shoes designed to soften the impact of running on the shin and knee.
(D) This past season, the total number of students who complained of pain while running rose.
(E) The maker of the new track claims that on average, complaints about shin splints fall 25% when its tracks are implemented.
We need to weaken the explanation of school authorities on why
number of students who complained about shin splints dropped significantly.
Looking at the options -
Bunuel wrote:
(A) As a result of West County High School's adoption of better medical staff and new medical scanning devices, many students whose complaints would have been diagnosed in years past as an instance of shin splints are now diagnosed with a different condition.
This option becomes irrelevant because it says that the diagnosis determined what the condition of the patient was, but the students were still coming with the complaints of Shin Splints. So students with complaints did not reduce but diagnosis clarified things.
Hence Incorrect.Bunuel wrote:
(B) West County High School built its track after a number of neighboring schools with similar track teams built new tracks and each school saw the number of complaints about shin splints drop.
This option also seems to be irrelevant as we are not concerned about how the tracks came into picture but about how they helped in lesser complaints.
Hence Incorrect.Bunuel wrote:
(C) This past season, members of West County High School's track team received and wore new and highly acclaimed shoes designed to soften the impact of running on the shin and knee.
This definitely provides an alternate explanation of why the complaints reduced.
Hence seems to be the best option for now.Bunuel wrote:
(D) This past season, the total number of students who complained of pain while running rose.
Completely opposite of what we want. Complaints increased instead of reducing.
Hence Incorrect.Bunuel wrote:
(E) The maker of the new track claims that on average, complaints about shin splints fall 25% when its tracks are implemented.
This acts as strengthener to the conclusion rather than a weakener. It supports the explanation given by school authorities.
Hence incorrect.Hence the best answer out of the lot seems to be C _________________
Regards,
AD
----------------
An admiration by anybody is an explanation understood by somebody !!! Happy GMATing... Go Nuts