It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 07:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2017, 11:42
nakib77 wrote:
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of

B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on

C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of

D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on

E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of




How In option D, "have been dated at 34 million years old' is correct? "Has/Have been" is used for any action which was initiated in past and still continuing? here we are talking about dating age of the fossils which if continue to present then 34 would not be constant and by now it might has been 200 years, isn't it?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 24

Location: Brazil
Concentration: Economics, Marketing
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 13:09
In my opinion letter A has no grramatical error.

Some have presented multiple information matters for it to be wrong, however, for me none of those are correct:

"sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of"


1)Pronoun (also OG response)
The pronoun "it" correctly addresses to the sloth, as due to the logical meaning of the sentence and there is a clear distinction addressing to the preceding sloth noun

2)Present simple

Some of you have said that present simple cannot be used to address something from that passed that is still used today, however present simple is also used to present facts EG "the earliest known mammal is the sloth"

3)Mammal of

Is not undiomatic and there is no error in relation.


for me the answer is D only because it presents a more solid cause and effect relation by using the verb-ing modifier."making it"

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 24

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2311

Kudos [?]: 9041 [0], given: 335

Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 14:04
gmat4varun wrote:
How In option D, "have been dated at 34 million years old' is correct? "Has/Have been" is used for any action which was initiated in past and still continuing? here we are talking about dating age of the fossils which if continue to present then 34 would not be constant and by now it might has been 200 years, isn't it?



Hello gmat4varun,

I will be glad to help you with this one. :-)

Present perfect tense verb is also used when the there is no definite time frame of the action.

In the given official sentence, we do not know when exactly the fossils have been dated. In case of such an indefinite time frame, use of present perfect tense is correct.

Let's see a simple sentence to understand this usage:

He has visited France twice.

From the above-mentioned sentence, we cannot say whether "he" visited France long back in the past or in the recent past. All we get to know that he has been to France twice.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9041 [0], given: 335

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 737

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 11

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 00:13
gmat4varun wrote:
How In option D, "have been dated at 34 million years old' is correct? "Has/Have been" is used for any action which was initiated in past and still continuing? here we are talking about dating age of the fossils which if continue to present then 34 would not be constant and by now it might has been 200 years, isn't it?

Hi gmat4varun, in this portion of the sentence, the sentence is not really talking about dating age, but the act of dating.

So, the act of dating has been done (at some unspecified time before now, and hence the use of present perfect).

The result of that act (of dating) was that the fossils were found to be 34 million years old (at the time when this act of dating was done).

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Present perfect tense, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 11

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 935

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 186

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 05:02
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of - Though this sentence has not grammatical errors, option D gives much clear and better understanding of the sentence.

B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on ==> What does "they" refer to? Also, the plural subject fossils does not go with singular "has" - Hence, Incorrect

C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of ==> Changes the meaning, it is not that they found "sloth" it should be fossils and the plural subject fossils does not go with singular "was" - Hence, Incorrect

D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on - CORRECT

E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of - the plural subject fossils does not go with singular "was" - Hence, Incorrect

Hence - D
_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Worried About IDIOMS? Here is a Daily Practice List: https://gmatclub.com/forum/idiom-s-ydmuley-s-daily-practice-list-250731.html#p1937393

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 186

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 32

Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 11:06
GMATNinja wrote:
KARISHMA315, the issue here is that in (B), (C), and (E), we have the noun modifiers ("relative pronouns", if you like grammar jargon) "which" and "that." With rare exceptions, these modifiers will point to the immediately preceding noun. So if we look at (B), (C), and (E) very strictly and literally, the sentences are saying that the sloth was found. And that doesn't make sense, unless you think that sloths live for millions of years. :)

When participles (often an "-ed" or "-ing" word, such as "found" or "making" or "including") are used as modifiers -- and that's exactly what "found" is doing in (A) and (D) -- they're much more forgiving in terms of their placement. It's fine for the participle "found" to modify the entire phrase that precedes it. So the phrase beginning with "found" can modify "fossils of the arm of a sloth", and not necessarily just the sloth.

I hope this helps!




Hi,

According to OG explanation to a similar problem (OG2017, problem 723), comma ing modifier must have distinct object to refer.

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

I don't understand why in this example "outnumbering" does not have a distinct object to refer to but "..., making the sloth" is considered to have a clear referent, which is "fossils"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 32

Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4289

Kudos [?]: 7908 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 12:00
Top Contributor
kablayi

According to OG explanation to a similar problem (OG2017, problem 723), comma ing modifier must have distinct object to refer.

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

I don't understand why in this example "outnumbering" does not have a distinct object to refer to but "..., making the sloth" is considered to have a clear referent, which is "fossils"

The Dickinson letters case has a deep meaning issue. The crux of the matter is that the letters outnumbered the letters she wrote to anyone else. The out number factor has to be expressed in a finite rather than expressed as an additional info. That is the reason A is rejected but E is preferred.
However, the sloth case is very different. Herein 'making' does modify the fossils and their standing testimony to the ancientness (it is better to call it a subject and its action rather than an object)
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7908 [0], given: 364

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 13

Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V31
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Advertising and PR)
Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 05:23
A and D were close.
I was stuck at A for a long time but the explanation for D is good enough :)

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 13

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 63

Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 08:16
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of it here is a little vague but workable.

B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on who found? what does they refer to?

C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of that was is singular and fossils is plural

D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on

E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of use of which is wrong here

Question: in option D, have been refers to something that is still happening now from the past. Is that right to use here?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 63

Re: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991,   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2017, 08:16

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 49 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.