It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 14:48

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 11:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 14:34
would go with E

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 14:35
would go with E

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 21:41
would go with E, too.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 21:41
would go with E, too.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 23:33
E - all the way.
That is the only close assumption.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2005, 23:58
I choose C for this...OA plz

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 04:31
OA is E.
good job once again.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 12:41
Yes, if E is not true the conclusion can not be supported, because there would be another cause, different from the accurary of the method employed, to explain the results.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 07 Nov 2005, 12:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.