It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 09:21

# Happening Now:

Live Chat with Cornell Johnson Adcoms and Students. Join HERE  |  HBS R1 Decision Chat

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# From 1000CR doc The media now devote more coverage to crime

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

From 1000CR doc The media now devote more coverage to crime [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2005, 19:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:01) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

From 1000CR doc

The media now devote more coverage to crime than they did ten years ago. Yet this is not because the crime rate has increased, but rather because the public is now more interested in reading and hearing about crime. After all, a crucial factor in the mediaâ€™s decisions about what issues to cover and to what extent to cover them is the interests of their audiences.

The proposition that the public is now more interested in reading and hearing about crime plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

(A) It supports the conclusion that the media now devote more coverage to crime than the crime rate alone justifies.
(B) It is presented as evidence that the media decide what to cover and to what extent to cover it depending on the interest of the public.
(C) It is a counterexample to the claim that the media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago.
(D) It is a generalization based on the claim that the crime rate has increased over the past ten years.
(E) It is offered as an alternative explanation of why the media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago.

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2005, 19:43
If I understand the question properly, the correct answer should be B. The conclusion is clear from the stimulus: "...the mediaâ€™s decisions about what issues to cover and to what extent to cover them is the interests of their audiences"

Therefore, the "proposition that the public is more interested about crime" is the evidence to support the media's actions.

a) The conclusion is that the media will cover what its audiences want to view. The crime rate is not part of the conclusion
b)
c) Not a counterexample
d) Out of scope
e) It does not offer an alternative explanation

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 231

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 05:25
go B go...

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 06:54
Nice outline rigger, indeed the answer must be B. Think of the media as a demand driven service.

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 15:25
OA is E. No OE provided.

Well in the test I had chosen B.. But after seeing the OA, I think E might be correct.
The first explanation is, media devotes more coverage to crime because crime rate has increased. But this is not true.. Therefore the alternate explanation is public is more interested in reading and hearing about crime. (this choice E states)

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 492 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 16:00
got this one wrong.... I was thinking it is A.

But I after taking a closer look, I see why E is the answer.

Conclusion is that crime did not increase in 10 years.
Premise is The media now devote more coverage to crime than they did ten years ago.

there can be various reasons for that. one of the reason is public interest.

A. it is not supporting the conclusion.
B. There is no evidence in this argument
C. it is not a counter example, it is consistant with the conclusion
D. makes the conclusion false
E. it is actually providing an alternative explanation.
Crime did not increase, still coverage is more, what is the reason for that?
So our answer choice should be E.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 492 [0], given: 0

02 Nov 2005, 16:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# From 1000CR doc The media now devote more coverage to crime

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.