It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 685 [0], given: 20

From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2010, 23:31
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:18) correct 25% (01:27) wrong based on 364 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States climbed 46 percent. But over that same period, spending on food to be consumed at home — purchased mainly from supermarkets — grew by only 20 percent.

Which of the following statements about the period from 1965 to 1988 in the United States is best supported by the statements above?

(A) Spending on food increased at restaurants and other food retailers that prepare food to be consumed away from home.
(B) Shoppers spent more on certain food products to be consumed at home that are not generally available in supermarkets.
(C) Food prices at supermarkets neither rose nor dropped relative to food prices at other food retailers.
(D There was a decrease in the number of heads of households, who tend to spend more than other household members on food consumed away from home.
(E) The number of people who ate at restaurants decreased relative to the number of people who ordered take-out food from restaurants.

Please explain with reasoning.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 685 [0], given: 20

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 8

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2010, 00:32
rohitgoel15 wrote:
From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States climbed 46 percent. But over that same period, spending on food to be consumed at home — purchased mainly from supermarkets — grew by only 20 percent.
Which of the following statements about the period from 1965 to 1988 in the United States is best supported by the statements above?
(A) Spending on food increased at restaurants and other food retailers that prepare food to be consumed away from home.
(B) Shoppers spent more on certain food products to be consumed at home that are not generally available in supermarkets.
(C) Food prices at supermarkets neither rose nor dropped relative to food prices at other food retailers.
(D There was a decrease in the number of heads of households, who tend to spend more than other household members on food consumed away from home.
(E) The number of people who ate at restaurants decreased relative to the number of people who ordered take-out food from restaurants.

Please explain with reasoning.



IMO A
Spending on food increased at restaurants and other food retailers that prepare food to be consumed away from home.
it says food consumption increased at restaurant and other food retailers. one of the major reason that overall food consumption increased by 46% as compared to only 20% at home

Any more suggestions
_________________

Success is my Destiny

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 8

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2010, 00:15
A
or I didn't see the catch.
Overall spending on food has increased much more than spending on food at home i.e. 20%. So, the rest could be attributed to food expenditure outside home.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1478

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2010, 11:45
I would pick (A) unless there is something hidden which I missed, as usual.

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2010, 12:30
Even I'll go with A !
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2010, 19:00
given:
1) spending on food increased by 46%
2) spending on food consumed at home incrased by 20%
=> the remaning increase must be spending on food outisde home.
hence, (A) is correct.

B) doesn't matter if it is from supermarket or not. still it is food consumed at home and only accounts for 20% increase.
C) nothing about prices is told.
D) nothing about the household members is told.
E) nothing about the number of peopel is told. just the amount spent is mentioned.

got this sol from another forum

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 412

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 08:56
From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the US climbed 46%. But over that same period, spending on food to be consumed at home purchased mainly from supermarkets grew by only 20%.

Which of the following statements about the period from 1965 to 1988 in the US is best supported by the statements above?

A. Spending on food increased at restaurants and other food retailers that prepare food to be consumed away from home.

B. Shoppers spent more on certain food products to be consumed at home that are not generally available in supermarkets.

C. Food prices at supermarkets neither rose nor dropped relative to food prices at other food retailers.

D. There was a decrease in the number of heads of households, who tend to spend more than other household members on food consumed away from home..

E. The number of people who ate at restaurants decreased relative to the number of people who ordered take out food from restaurants.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 08:57
I eliminated C,D,E easily.


Between A and B, I chose B..
but OA is A.

Can someone please post an explanation, and tell me where i am wrong.

Thanks.
Amrit.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 440

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 20

Location: Texas
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 10:27
amritgodofwar wrote:
I eliminated C,D,E easily.


Between A and B, I chose B..
but OA is A.

Can someone please post an explanation, and tell me where i am wrong.

Thanks.
Amrit.


A is definately strong. B is tempting but think that people buying from regular stores 26% and 20% from supermarket.
Compared with 26% spending on restaurants and 20% on supermarkets makes more sense.

Also B reads people bought 'certain products' from regular stores. if it would have said a 'very high percentage' of food from regular stores... B would have been a better choice.
hope this helps.

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 20

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 10:38
i really didnt understand what the question is trying to say..

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 7

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Schulich (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.13
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 14:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
amritgodofwar wrote:
I eliminated C,D,E easily.


Between A and B, I chose B..
but OA is A.

Can someone please post an explanation, and tell me where i am wrong.

Thanks.
Amrit.


The stimulus says that spending on food to be consumed at home grew by only 20% which implies spending on food not consumed at home must have increased to balance out the spending. A says the same thing.

B says shoppers spent more on certain food products to be consumed at home that are no generally available in supermarket . This is not strong enough since according to stimulus most spending on food to be consumed at home was done at supermarket.

Hope it helps

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 7

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 37

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 00:07
I too am leaning toward B.

I feel that the Conclusion states:

Spending on home food [strike]to be consumed at home[/strike] purchased mainly from supermarkets grew by only 20%. ==> The purchases made at Supermarket grew by just 20 %.

What is the source of this Problem ?

Crick

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 37

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 00:09
crick20002002 wrote:
I too am leaning toward B.

I feel that the Conclusion states:

Spending on home food [strike]to be consumed at home[/strike] purchased mainly from supermarkets grew by only 20%. ==> The purchases made at Supermarket grew by just 20 %.

What is the source of this Problem ?

Crick


Source is Jamboree

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 00:10
amritgodofwar wrote:
crick20002002 wrote:
I too am leaning toward B.

I feel that the Conclusion states:

Spending on home food [strike]to be consumed at home[/strike] purchased mainly from supermarkets grew by only 20%. ==> The purchases made at Supermarket grew by just 20 %.

What is the source of this Problem ?

Crick


Source is Jamboree


I chose B initially, but then when i read the explanation specified above, I convinced myself that it's A and not B, though I'm still not fully convinced...

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 7

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Schulich (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.13
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 05:22
Lets assume that earlier the spending on food was $100
Now the spending on food is 146$
Increase = 46$
Increased spending on food consumable at home = 20$ [ this food was mainly purchased from Supermarket]
Remaining 26$ must be spent on food not consumable at home - This is exactly what choice A says.

B cannot be the answer as B says "Shoppers spent more on certain food products to be consumed at home that are not generally available in supermarkets." but it doesn't say anything about the percent increase. Even if I assume that it means percent increase then this would just negate the stimulus which says that majority of the spending on food consumable at home was done at supermarket. Enough for me to eliminate this choice.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 7

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 195 [1], given: 37

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 05:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
Check this link out

http://gmatclub.com/forum/spending-on-food-92176.html

There are two hyphens in the actual question, they change the inference of the Conclusion and in line with why A would be correct.

If Jamboree's version of question does not include the hyphens (-), you should definitely look at more standard sources.


Crick

Kudos [?]: 195 [1], given: 37

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 5

Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2011, 06:32
Crick.. Thanks for the link.. That really helps to solve the ambiguity!!
_________________

Cheers,
Varun


If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2012, 10:31
IMO B,..........

A doesn't exclude the possibility of food being purchases from supermarket...

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 227

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 55

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2012, 11:20
I used POE and see no relevance in other choices so I picked A. Any one know the OA?

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 55

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 12

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2012, 14:20
Since thee was an increase in over all spending for food, but decrease in one part spent on food...

it is quite obvious that that some thing has to increase in-order for that statement to be true , Statement A fits the logic correctly

Hence A

Hope that helps!!
_________________

Work with hope in Heart and dreams in the eyes .... And leave the mind for GMAT problems ;)

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 12

Re: From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States   [#permalink] 12 May 2012, 14:20

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.