GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 25 May 2019, 16:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 14
Location: Moldova, Republic of
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2017, 10:51
NY crime rate proportion :
in 2001 : 851 / 100,000 (more than 50% decrease)
in 1994 : 1861 / 100,000 (which represents 100%)

US crime rate proportion :
in 2001 : 500 / 100,000 (about 30% decrease)
in 1994 : 715 / 100,000 (which represents 100%)

Therefore, comparing NY to US :
in 1994 : 1881 / 100,000 > 715 / 100,000 ----------> NY > US
in 2001 : 851 / 100,000 > 500 / 100,000 ------------> NY > US

Option D is correct.

All other options cannot be inferred from the passage.
Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 725
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2017, 18:31
carcass wrote:
From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily decreased by over 50%, from a rate of 1,861 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 1994 down to 851 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2001. Criminologists have partially attributed this drop to proactive policing tactics such as “broken window po-licing,” wherein city officials immediately fixed small acts of vandalism and, as a result, lowered other types of criminal behavior. During this same period, the rate of violent crime in the United States steadily decreased by 28% (down to 500 violent crimes per 100,000 people).

Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information above?

(A) The decrease in the total crime rate in the United States caused the decrease in New York City’s crime rate.Careful. Based on the information provided, we could equally likely conclude that a decrease in New York's City's crime rate led to the decrease in the United States

(B) New York City spends more per capita on law enforcement than does the rest of the United States. Clearly out of scope

(C) If the rest of the United States were to adopt law enforcement tactics similar to those of New York City, national violent crime rates would
continue to fall. This is too ambitious- we don't really know this
(D) Between 1994 and 2001, the violent crime rate in New York City was consistently higher than the national average. Yes
(E) The violent crime rate in New York City will soon be below the national average.
This is too ambitious
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1211
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2017, 13:24
From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily decreased by over 50%, from a rate of 1,861 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 1994 down to 851 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2001. Criminologists have partially attributed this drop to proactive policing tactics such as “broken window po-licing,” wherein city officials immediately fixed small acts of vandalism and, as a result, lowered other types of criminal behavior. During this same period, the rate of violent crime in the United States steadily decreased by 28% (down to 500 violent crimes per 100,000 people).

Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information above?

(A) The decrease in the total crime rate in the United States caused the decrease in New York City’s crime rate.
We don't have any causal relationship depicted in the argument.

(B) New York City spends more per capita on law enforcement than does the rest of the United States.
We can't say this based on the passage.

(C) If the rest of the United States were to adopt law enforcement tactics similar to those of New York City, national violent crime rates would continue to fall.
We are only told about the percentage reduction in crime and nothing else.

(D) Between 1994 and 2001, the violent crime rate in New York City was consistently higher than the national average.
True. 851>500.

(E) The violent crime rate in New York City will soon be below the national average.
_________________
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1529
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2018, 12:16
this question is not hard; test takers who practice verbal gmat a lot will recognize D as the answer without reading any other option. Nevertheless, on the actual exam, tricky questions and psychology will influence the gmat skills of test takers.

Back to the question, "decreased by 28% (down to 500 violent crimes per 100,000 people)" is the main key. That means in 2001, the national rate is 72% of that in 1994. By estimation, the national rate in 1994 is 700 (instead of 500, take 490 => 72% = 490, so 100% = 700) -> D
Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2018
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Other, Operations
GPA: 3.15
WE: General Management (Computer Software)
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2018, 23:28
Hi,

Can someone please explain why D is 100% true.
It is stated in the Stimulus that there is a reduction of Violent crimes from 1861 t0 851(more than 1000 reduction) in NYC. while the violent Crime during the same period is just 500 in the US.
How is it possible?

If I look at the percentage only, Option D sounds correct.
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2017
Posts: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 3.1
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2018, 09:58

In the question it mentions "conclusion best supported," D is the only one that is best supported, just by the numbers given, NYC had a higher rate of crime rate.
Re: From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2018, 09:58

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by