GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 28 Jan 2020, 01:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool

 new topic post reply Update application status
Author Message
Manager
Status: Never give up!
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma, Omicron Delta Epsilon, Toastmasters Intl, HHonors
Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 199
Location: Raleigh-Durham NC
From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2011, 12:08
6
1
http://www.aringo.com/clientinfo/chance ... n27985.htm

If you want to quantify your chances, the best I've seen from almost anywhere. Hats off to "pdenton92000" for helping me find it! And thank you "GilLevi" and Aringo!
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 8
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2011, 23:58
1
This is not completely accurate, usually there is not much of a difference between round 1 and round 2. you should submit your application when it is ready and not rush it. good luck!
Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 43
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2011, 09:52
1
The best thing was subtract points if you are an Indian. Hillarious but correct.
Manager
Status: Disbelief! The Countdown Begins
Affiliations: CFA
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 215
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Johnson '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V28
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V39
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Accounting (Insurance)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2012, 12:41
1
I took this several months ago... According to the assessment (if I answer realistically), I am a stretch at every school I am applying to.

Why would I let this tool stop me from reaching out to my goals and dreams? This tool knows nothing about me. It knows nothing about any of you. Dont let it deter you.. the more time we waste worrying about this thing the less likely you are to get in cause your essays arent being polished...
Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 21
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
GPA: 3.67
WE: Information Technology (Education)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2012, 11:27
1
seems like bullshit to me. yes you can get a better idea of how competitive you are in terms of objectiveness, but the overall application process is marred by a myriad of grey areas. you can be competitive on this point system and still get dinged.

i wouldn't really use this as a metric for admission by any means.
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 111
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2012, 01:00
1
Diablo wrote:
seems like bullshit to me. yes you can get a better idea of how competitive you are in terms of objectiveness, but the overall application process is marred by a myriad of grey areas. you can be competitive on this point system and still get dinged.

i wouldn't really use this as a metric for admission by any means.

The Devil's hands are idle playthings.

I would agree the metric is virtually meaningless, because there are so many human factors involved in the process. You can run into people that love your background or people that hate it at virtually any school.

That said it's fun, and somewhat valid. Funny story, I had a 39 and saw that the scale only went down to 61 and was discouraged/confused. Saw I skipped the the entire section 3! Once I filled that in I was a 69.5 or if everything is strong or a 61 if everything is moderate. I feel that's pretty spot on as my non-traditional background puts me in the into the stretch/competitive realm for top tier schools and competitive for that second tier. Pretty much how my gut feels.

Also, absolutely random fact (solely because my fiancée taught me this just today) "myriad of" is incorrect English. You should have said "marred by a myriad grey areas". It sounds terrible when spoken, but for some reason is correct English. (cue NBC The More Your Know) Absolutely blew my mind.
Current Student
Status: Too close for missiles, switching to guns.
Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Posts: 785
Location: United States
Schools: Johnson (Cornell) - Class of 2015
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2013, 10:33
1
It's a decent tool, but of course, guarantees nothing. I just did it for the hell of it, and I think it oversimplifies the GMAT/GPA section. It doesn't account for Quant %ile, nor does it ask what you studied in college - those are two things adcoms look at. Also, not all adcoms are going to "weight" each aspect of your profile and application like this - each adcom takes a holistic view and comes to its own conclusions.

For the record - my score was a ~55 when I rated my essays/application/recommendation/resume as "medium" and ~62 when I rated them as "strong"...I'm sure I fell somewhere in between.

The schools I applied to:
Kellogg - 72: Stretch. I got dinged, so I guess this was accurate.
Tuck - 68: Closer to Stretch than competitive. WL, so result TBD I guess.
Darden - 65: Close to being competitive than to being a stretch. WL - again, TBD.
Johnson - 65: Close to being competitive than to being a stretch. Accepted, awarded full-tuition fellowship.

Bottom line, this tool made me look like crap, but it's the Adcoms that decide if you'll get in, not a tool. Personally, I think this is just something Aringo uses to drum up business because it says "If you worked with Aringo, mark your essays/resume/recommendations as 'Strong'" which earns you a few more points on this assessment, giving the nervous applicant peace of mind, etc, etc.
_________________
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 23 Dec 2014
Posts: 286
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V40
GMAT 3: 710 Q44 V42
GPA: 3.3
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2015, 13:14
1
heightY wrote:
Kim31 wrote:
How does a school enter the top-ranked list of MBA schools? I am just wondering how they got the title.

What a very good question. Thanks for jz4analytics for the responses.

I found the specific methodologies for US News, The Economist, and Bloomberg BW, which I collected here:

mba-ranking-methodologies-what-is-really-important-200971.html

BW is clearly biased and unreliable. US News is better, but I am afraid it favors "prestige" too much. It is a bit self-enforcing. That said, the top ten schools, though in different order, are almost identical between US News and The Economist (US News has Kellogg and no Stern; The Economist has it flipped). That's comforting. But again, you can look at the methodologies and see how they shift the top ten - Tuck, Darden, and Haas move from the bottom half to the top according to The Economist, while Stanford and Wharton move from the top few to the bottom of the 10.
MBA Section Director
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 7428
City: Pune
From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2016, 12:04
1
hArT wrote:
Wondering here what's the exact difference of Full time MBA from Executive MBA. Can we discuss some of it, guys?

Main difference between FT MBA and Exe MBA is that the later is considered ideal for those (1) who have considerably higher work experience, generally 8+, and (2) who just want to advance in their current field and are not looking for a career switch.
_________________
2020 MBA Applicants: Introduce Yourself Here!

MBA Video Series - Video answers to specific components and questions about MBA applications.

2020 MBA Deadlines, Essay Questions and Analysis of all top MBA programs
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Posts: 28
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2011, 00:55
just tried it, i think it was a bit pesimistic for me in Wharton...
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 10
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2011, 03:06
This is an interesting tool, but I'm not sure how accurate it is... I tried it on myself and got 59, a bit weak I guess, and I didn't feel it fully reflects all aspects of my candidacy.
Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 99
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2015
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2011, 17:46
This is very similar to the Vocaz application assessment tool for engineers.
Assuming strong essays, and recommendations, this puts me in the ball park that I would expect.

The 50% admission chance for competitive candidates feels high (for most schools thats more than 2x the admission rate).
According to the GMATclub applicant threads and spreadsheets, the average GMATclub applicant meets the median admit GPA/GMAT/age/WE almost everytime, but the GC admit rate is not nearly as high as 50% (at every school anyways)
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2011, 22:41
This is very similar to the Vocaz application assessment tool for engineers.
Assuming strong essays, and recommendations, this puts me in the ball park that I would expect.

The 50% admission chance for competitive candidates feels high (for most schools thats more than 2x the admission rate).
According to the GMATclub applicant threads and spreadsheets, the average GMATclub applicant meets the median admit GPA/GMAT/age/WE almost everytime, but the GC admit rate is not nearly as high as 50% (at every school anyways)

How can you assume strong essays and recommendations? according to that tool, these are big parts of the score, but you can't know their strength for sure, you can only assume (and might be wrong). So what does it tell you about your chances? not much in my opinion.
Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 99
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2015
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2011, 10:15
brainiac wrote:
How can you assume strong essays and recommendations? according to that tool, these are big parts of the score, but you can't know their strength for sure, you can only assume (and might be wrong). So what does it tell you about your chances? not much in my opinion.

I completely agree with you that the weightings are a bit whacky. To put things in perspective, 30 additional points on the GMAT ~3pts carries more weight than receiving MVP for winning the Superbowl ~2pts or winning a Nobel Prize ~ 1.2. Of course winning a Superbowl MVP AND a Nobel prize are together worth less than strong essays + strong recos by a long shot~6pts , but keep in mind this is a tool designed to sell a consulting service that focuses on essay + reco coaching (ie assign an objective value to a subjective measure).

The point I'm trying to make is that the chances indicator is more ball-park than anything (no different than a "What are my chances?" admission consultant thread) based on your GPA/GMAT/WE. Truth is these are all data points - both subjective and objective - but at the end of the day all that matters is what the Adcoms decision - no other chance indicator really matters.
Senior Manager
Affiliations: CBS Class of 2014
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 390
Concentration: Finance
Schools: CBS '14 (M)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2011, 12:28
1
With my score of a 69 and being invited to an interview with Columbia.. I'd say it's not that far off... this isn't an exact science but it does make some sense.
Intern
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Posts: 27
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2011, 13:33
This means you are competitive at Columbia, so it can go either way. Good luck on the interview!
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2011, 11:53
Why is there such a big difference between round 1 and round 2?
I thought they're both equally competitive, no?
Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2011, 22:33
NO! everybody knows that round 1 is less competitive than the others, since the class is still empty and you can't be rejected due to lack of space.
If you apply in 2nd round, the class is already partially full so you compete for less seats. That's why everyone is trying to make it for round 1.
Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2011, 01:54
This is not completely accurate, usually there is not much of a difference between round 1 and round 2. you should submit your application when it is ready and not rush it. good luck!

Are you sure? it's not what i've heard. Does it apply to all schools? Anyone else knows something about it?
Senior Manager
Affiliations: CBS Class of 2014
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 390
Concentration: Finance
Schools: CBS '14 (M)
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2011, 10:32
Got admitted to CBS.. so tool was close. Look in regards to RD1 vs RD2.. yes it's best to apply when you have the ability to put forth your best application. There are innate benefits to applying early (especially Tuck/CBS) that come along with a limited applicant pool and no preset demographic or class profile to make. As the seats get taken by admits... the class starts to define itself and therefore the future admits may have a "tougher" time getting in if they are from an overrepresented group of that admit class. If the school wants roughly 25% consultants... and they've gotten a flux of consultant applications in RD1... and admitted 17%... that means in RD2 a consultant applicant will find it tough to get a seat as they're more picky with those they admit under that profile now. Make sense? You don't know the specific split or how many they've accepted in each "bucket"... which is why the sooner is better than later scenario plays out for most. The counter argument is that all the eager and top performers apply in RD1 so RD2 will be less competitive.. if you want to take that chance... go ahead and roll the dice, but I would feel better about applying early.
Re: From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool   [#permalink] 28 Sep 2011, 10:32

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10    Next  [ 200 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# From Aringo: *Awesome* Application Self-Assessment Tool

 new topic post reply Update application status

Moderators: billionaire, Hatakekakashi