Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 09:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# From Knewton The couturier hired a consultant who advised

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 49
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2011, 14:45
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (01:33) correct 19% (00:16) wrong based on 31 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

From Knewton
The couturier hired a consultant who advised that the increasing of risks of failure for those in the fashion industry has prompted many young designers to seek an international customer base in order to sell their clothes more quickly and for a higher price.

(A)the increasing of risks

(B)increasing risks

(C) the increasing risk

(D)because of the increasing risk

(E)because of increasing risk

[Reveal] Spoiler: My question
In regards to this question I have a few questions:

The increasing of risks of failure.

Is the -ing form + of always an incorrect form grammatically ?

Knewton explains D and E as follows:
Choices D and E use because, which introduces a subordinate clause. However, the second part of the sentence does not make sense as a subordinate clause; the second sentence pattern becomes a fragment..

Is this (below) the right understanding ?

...who advised that (is an dependant clause).... because of increasing risk (because introduces another dependent clause)?

If you pick E, is the structure of the entire sentence.

The courier (subject) hired (main verb)=> Independent clause + dependent clause + dependent clause ?
Is this above a structurally grammatical error ?

how are the rules,

For example is it ok to structure a sentence: dependent + independent + dependent ?

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2054
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 390

Kudos [?]: 1379 [0], given: 8

Re: Dependent vs. Independent? Fragment ? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2011, 15:59
hafgola wrote:
From Knewton
The couturier hired a consultant who advised that the increasing of risks of failure for those in the fashion industry has prompted many young designers to seek an international customer base in order to sell their clothes more quickly and for a higher price.

(A)the increasing of risks

(B)increasing risks

(C) the increasing risk

(D)because of the increasing risk

(E)because of increasing risk

[Reveal] Spoiler: My question
In regards to this question I have a few questions:

The increasing of risks of failure.

Is the -ing form + of always an incorrect form grammatically ?

Knewton explains D and E as follows:
Choices D and E use because, which introduces a subordinate clause. However, the second part of the sentence does not make sense as a subordinate clause; the second sentence pattern becomes a fragment..

Is this (below) the right understanding ?

...who advised that (is an dependant clause).... because of increasing risk (because introduces another dependent clause)?

If you pick E, is the structure of the entire sentence.

The courier (subject) hired (main verb)=> Independent clause + dependent clause + dependent clause ?
Is this above a structurally grammatical error ?

how are the rules,

For example is it ok to structure a sentence: dependent + independent + dependent ?

We don't teach with these fancy subordinate clauses, but here's how we think through it:

"the increasing of risks" is automatically a RED FLAG idiom.

It should be either:
increasing risk (C)
or
increasing risks (B)

But how do we know which one? Is it singular or plural?

Well, look further into the sentence for the keyword: "has prompted"

So you know it must be singular, NOT plural.

So between (B) and (C), you choose "increasing risk" (singular) HAS prompted.

And that's it. Choose (C). Not too much thinking required.
Re: Dependent vs. Independent? Fragment ?   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2011, 15:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Around the world, fuel engineers, who are often hired by a research co 1 20 Oct 2015, 03:48
5 The consultant team advised the insurance company that 3 17 Feb 2015, 08:08
1 Practice: Indefinite Pronouns - This is from the Knewton 14 28 Aug 2011, 06:46
Source: Knewton In a shock to those who still lived under 5 03 Oct 2010, 10:48
12 Super Tough SC Question from Knewton 11 03 Jun 2010, 08:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by