It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 23:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 186 [5], given: 0

From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2007, 20:50
5
KUDOS
30
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (00:46) correct 33% (00:48) wrong based on 996 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 186 [5], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42248

Kudos [?]: 132527 [12], given: 12324

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2013, 05:49
12
KUDOS
Expert's post
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
bulletpoint wrote:
lwwlwwlww wrote:
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

the amount after two deductions is p- (t%)p-s
we get p-s from (1) but we don't know p(t%) , so it is insufficient
we get pt from (2) ,it means p(t%)=7552/100 . But we don't know p-s, it is insufficient.

combining the two data, we can get p- (t%)p-s. Therefore, the ans is C

So what would the actual answer be if we had to calculate it? And if the question says t%, isnt the equation just p - pt - s, and not p -pt% - s?

From what I gather, if we plug in the numbers we get: 244- 7552= -7308?? Does that mean Leland is losing money?

From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

We need to find the value of $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s$$.

(1) p - s = 244 --> we need to find the value of $$244-\frac{pt}{100}$$. Not sufficient.

(2) pt = 7,552 --> we need to find the value of $$p-\frac{7,552}{100}-s$$. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s=244-75.52=168.48$$. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132527 [12], given: 12324

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Re: DS - Leland's gross pay (tricky...) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2007, 21:14
1
KUDOS
ricokevin wrote:
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

I'm confused as to whether finding out exactly one figure for the remained amount is what the question is asking or if it's asking for a condition that, when certain values for p, s, and t are plugged in, gives the figure...

thanks!

My interpretation of the question is that we need to find the value of p-t-s in dollars

stat1 alone: insufficient since t is unknown
stat2 alone: insufficient since s is unknown nor is the value of p or t or p-t

stat2 & stat1: insufficient since massaging these eqs to get p-t-s does'nt seem to be possible

I would pick E

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2007, 19:41
1
KUDOS
ricokevin wrote:
That's what I thought. E.

But the correct answer is C...

(maybe the correct answer is wrong...)

ooops... just realized that it is t percent not t dollars so what we need to find is p - pt/100 - s

which can be found if we use info from both the statements so ans is C!

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2013
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2013, 21:11
1
KUDOS
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

the amount after two deductions is p- (t%)p-s
we get p-s from (1) but we don't know p(t%) , so it is insufficient
we get pt from (2) ,it means p(t%)=7552/100 . But we don't know p-s, it is insufficient.

combining the two data, we can get p- (t%)p-s. Therefore, the ans is C

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 64 [1], given: 8

GMAT 1: 540 Q34 V30
GMAT 2: 700 Q43 V42
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2013, 00:49
1
KUDOS
@bunuel: there is a small error. in your explanation for statement 1 you confused 244 with 224. same for the combination of the statements

Kudos [?]: 64 [1], given: 8

Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 5

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2014, 08:46
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
bulletpoint wrote:
lwwlwwlww wrote:
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

the amount after two deductions is p- (t%)p-s
we get p-s from (1) but we don't know p(t%) , so it is insufficient
we get pt from (2) ,it means p(t%)=7552/100 . But we don't know p-s, it is insufficient.

combining the two data, we can get p- (t%)p-s. Therefore, the ans is C

So what would the actual answer be if we had to calculate it? And if the question says t%, isnt the equation just p - pt - s, and not p -pt% - s?

From what I gather, if we plug in the numbers we get: 244- 7552= -7308?? Does that mean Leland is losing money?

From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

We need to find the value of $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s$$.

(1) p - s = 244 --> we need to find the value of $$244-\frac{pt}{100}$$. Not sufficient.

(2) pt = 7,552 --> we need to find the value of $$p-\frac{7,552}{100}-s$$. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s=244-75.52=148.48$$. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I am happy I'm not the only one making careless mistakes. 244-75.52=168.52

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2007, 23:19
That's what I thought. E.

But the correct answer is C...

(maybe the correct answer is wrong...)

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 16

Schools: LBS MIF '15
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2013, 05:35
lwwlwwlww wrote:
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

the amount after two deductions is p- (t%)p-s
we get p-s from (1) but we don't know p(t%) , so it is insufficient
we get pt from (2) ,it means p(t%)=7552/100 . But we don't know p-s, it is insufficient.

combining the two data, we can get p- (t%)p-s. Therefore, the ans is C

So what would the actual answer be if we had to calculate it? And if the question says t%, isnt the equation just p - pt - s, and not p -pt% - s?

From what I gather, if we plug in the numbers we get: 244- 7552= -7308?? Does that mean Leland is losing money?

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 16

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42248

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2013, 06:43
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
vogelleblanc wrote:
@bunuel: there is a small error. in your explanation for statement 1 you confused 244 with 224. same for the combination of the statements

Typo edited. Thank you.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42248

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2014, 08:59
Fabino26 wrote:
I am happy I'm not the only one making careless mistakes. 244-75.52=168.52

Thank you.

Actually it's 168.48.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 2405

GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2014, 18:18
Need p - pt/100 - s. Only C can give the required elements.

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 2405

Current Student
Joined: 08 Feb 2014
Posts: 206

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 145

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q39 V41
WE: Analyst (Commercial Banking)
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2014, 15:32
after Bunuel's explanation, I think thats a wrap on this one. Very concise.

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 145

Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 7

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2015, 18:28
The question is using both percent and fixed value in the stem.

P - tP - S = ?

P is fixed weekly income
t is percent to be multiplied by P to know the amount for tax
S is fixed savings amount

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q46 V40
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2016, 18:29
Bunuel wrote:
bulletpoint wrote:
lwwlwwlww wrote:
From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

(1) p - s = 244
(2) pt = 7,552

the amount after two deductions is p- (t%)p-s
we get p-s from (1) but we don't know p(t%) , so it is insufficient
we get pt from (2) ,it means p(t%)=7552/100 . But we don't know p-s, it is insufficient.

combining the two data, we can get p- (t%)p-s. Therefore, the ans is C

So what would the actual answer be if we had to calculate it? And if the question says t%, isnt the equation just p - pt - s, and not p -pt% - s?

From what I gather, if we plug in the numbers we get: 244- 7552= -7308?? Does that mean Leland is losing money?

From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent was deducted for taxes and then s dollars was deducted for savings. What amount of Leland's gross pay last week remained after these two deductions?

We need to find the value of $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s$$.

(1) p - s = 244 --> we need to find the value of $$244-\frac{pt}{100}$$. Not sufficient.

(2) pt = 7,552 --> we need to find the value of $$p-\frac{7,552}{100}-s$$. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) $$p-\frac{pt}{100}-s=244-75.52=168.48$$. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I don't understand...How is pt/100 considered a dollar amount?

I get 244 - 7552????...

I understand now... pt= 7552 is just the numerator... I assumed pt=7552 is the same pt/100=7552

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Posts: 208

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 510

Location: India
GPA: 3.2
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2016, 08:17
Bunuel, this question can't be done in this way ? -- (p*(100-t)/100)-s? this will give (100p-pt)/100-s -- this does not seem solvable; please help if you can solve this using the statements. thank you!

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 510

Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2016
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2017, 14:32
I am confused on how we would know from the stem that t percent is does not already assume that it would be divided by 100?

If it were 4%, I would already make the assumption that is equal to 4/100 or .04.

It feels misleading of the prompt to force the test taker to make the assumption that has not already been completed by multiplying pt.

I wound up in the same boat as the poster who got to a negative number when combining both statements. At that point I decided not to sit and scratch my head and went for E in order to move on.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42248

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2017, 01:18
ghancock wrote:
I am confused on how we would know from the stem that t percent is does not already assume that it would be divided by 100?

If it were 4%, I would already make the assumption that is equal to 4/100 or .04.

It feels misleading of the prompt to force the test taker to make the assumption that has not already been completed by multiplying pt.

I wound up in the same boat as the poster who got to a negative number when combining both statements. At that point I decided not to sit and scratch my head and went for E in order to move on.

4% = 4/100, similarly t% = t/100.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132527 [0], given: 12324

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 435

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 15

Location: India
Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2017, 06:12
Prompt analysis
Gross pay will be p(1-0.01*t) - s = p-s - 0.01pt

Superset
The value will be any positive real number

Translation
To find the gross pay, we need
1#Exact value of p, t, s
2# the value of p-s and pt
3# any other relation so that we can come up to the exact figure

Statement analysis
St 1: p-s = 244. We don't know the value of pt. INSUFFICIENT
St 2: pt = 7.552. We don't the value of p-s. INSUFFICIENT
St 1 & St 2: we know p-s and pt. SUFFICIENT

Option C

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 15

Re: From Leland's gross pay of p dollars last week, t percent   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2017, 06:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by