GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 05 Dec 2019, 07:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 65
Re: From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2014, 06:48
Archit143 wrote:
jsahni123 wrote:
Archit143 wrote:
A It assumes, without justification, that the only factor helping weak peasants survive longer was the fact that they were not enlisted into the army.

Considering Necessary and Sufficient reasoning for the argument , we get the following result
Necessary (Strong Peasent Or Enlisted in the army)------------------->Sufficient (short Life span)

As per A: Factor helping weak peasents to live longer is not enlisted in the army i.e. Since weak peasents are not strong they are not enlisted in the army, hence they can live longer...
It maintains the necessary and sufficient condition mentioned in the argument....So we cannot eliminate the option choice basis on the above reasoning.

i think its an assumption for sure made in the argument that If weak peasants donot join army they will live longe because if we negate it, the conclusion cannot stand on stand. Hence I still think A is a strong contender.



Hi Archit

When i read the question and the answer choices i felt the three contenders could be A,B & E here but i eliminated B & E on the basis that nothing regarding the intermediate peasent and smart peasant is made in the argument and would be more of a bringing outside knowledge to the scope of the answers.

Hence i feel strongly about A with the reasons mentioned by you.

Thanks
Jatin


I second your thought and that is what i am contending.....



Frankly speaking, none of the options make sense and i feel it's not even a valid GMAT question;
As for options A and E, neither does the argument take anything "for granted", nor does it assume like not getting enlisted in the army is the only chances of survival.
Remaining B, C, and D; B introduces an additional element about peasants with intermediate strength and their comparison with strong and weak peasants that in no ways can be a correct answer.
C is a weakener, had C been true peasants of all stature would have been sent to the army
D too is irrelevant .

Carcass, your thoughts on this would be awesome.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 81
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Premium Member
From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2017, 13:12
If these choices were pets to chose from, B would be the Labrador Retriever. Just the most reliable pet out of the three.
B) It overlooks the possibility that there were peasants of intermediate strength who enjoyed survival benefits greater than those of either the strong or the weak.

You can be weak, enjoy the benefit of not enlisting in the army but with the cost of falling sick more often.
You can be strong, enjoy the benefit of not falling sick but with the cost of having to enlist in the army and in turn live a short life.
But what if you could just about be lean - not weak and not too strong - enjoy the benefits of both without any of their drawbacks.
_________________
If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 238
Re: From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2017, 00:51
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________
Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7143
Re: From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 May 2019, 05:29
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for   [#permalink] 03 May 2019, 05:29

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

From the perspective of long-term survival, it was best for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne