It is currently 20 Mar 2018, 22:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 195
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)
Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2015, 07:04
3
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:09) correct 16% (01:18) wrong based on 843 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In order to reduce dependence on imported oil, the government of Jalica has imposed minimum fuel-efficiency requirements on all new cars, beginning this year. The more fuel-efficient a car, the less pollution it produces per mile driven. As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars that meet the new requirements, annual pollution from car traffic is likely to decrease in Jalica.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument‘?

A. In Jalica, domestically produced oil is more expensive than imported oil.

B. The Jalican government did not intend the new fuel-eﬁiciency requirement to be a pollution- reduction measure.

C. Some pollution-control devices mandated in Jalica make cars less fuel-eﬁicient than they would be without those devices.

D. The new regulation requires no change in the chemical formulation of ﬁmel for cars in Jalica.

E. Jalicans who get cars that are more fuel-eﬂicient tend to do more driving than before.

"Please hit kudos, if you like this post"
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q48 V17
GPA: 3.83
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2015, 08:41
1
KUDOS
Ans E
If total driven miles increase, then pollution will increase.
So this weakens the author's argument.

hit KUDOS if u liked
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Apr 2016, 21:57
2
KUDOS
the above poster's reasoning is incorrect since the argument here is not reduce pollution but to reduce the country's dependence on imported oil. My reasoning is that lets say previously

So from the image file we can say that even though more fuel efficient cars came into existence they compensate for the amount of fuel used by driving more miles hence the level of dependence on imported oil remains the same. so this weakens the author's argument.

PLS HIT KUDOS IF U LIKE MY EXPLANATION
Attachments

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 10.35.12 AM.png [ 29.22 KiB | Viewed 5001 times ]

Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Posts: 60
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2017, 06:24
Hi
I am Stuck up B & E.

My analysis as follows

B: As Govt didnt intend it as pollution reduction measure, Wont it make the conclusion less believable ?

E : More driving than earlier after getting equipped with fuel efficient;
More driving than earlier --> More KM--> Pollution will not likely to decrease.
Shatters the Conclusion.

Kindly let me know where i am faltered?
Director
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 665
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2017, 09:39
gvvsnraju@1 wrote:
Hi
I am Stuck up B & E.

My analysis as follows

B: As Govt didnt intend it as pollution reduction measure, Wont it make the conclusion less believable ?

E : More driving than earlier after getting equipped with fuel efficient;
More driving than earlier --> More KM--> Pollution will not likely to decrease.
Shatters the Conclusion.

Kindly let me know where i am faltered?

B is already stated in the passage the intent of govt was to reduce the oil dependency .....
whatever the intent may be , we are more concern about the outcome ....and in this answer choice nothing is mentioned about outcome ...just intent of govt is outlined ...
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3290
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2017, 06:23
gvvsnraju@1 wrote:
Hi
I am Stuck up B & E.

My analysis as follows

B: As Govt didnt intend it as pollution reduction measure, Wont it make the conclusion less believable ?

E : More driving than earlier after getting equipped with fuel efficient;
More driving than earlier --> More KM--> Pollution will not likely to decrease.
Shatters the Conclusion.

Kindly let me know where i am faltered?

Your query is correctly explained by sobby in the above post - closing this request.
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 287
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2017, 07:06
Although the correct answer choice is 'E' - The statement implies, if the new fuel-efficient cars are driven more miles per year than older cars are, they may produce as much or more pollution per year than older cars do even though they produce less pollution per mile driven.

Can anyone suggest the reasoning why choices A and C are incorrect? Thanks.
_________________

Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1947
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2017, 13:36
In order to reduce dependence on imported oil, the government of Jalica has imposed minimum fuel-efficiency requirements on all new cars, beginning this year. The more fuel-efficient a car, the less pollution it produces per mile driven. As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars that meet the new requirements, annual pollution from car traffic is likely to decrease in Jalica.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars with new fuel - efficiency standards, fuel consumption will decrease and thus annual pollution from car traffic will decrease
- The argument assumes the fuel consumption will not increase - either the people drive more now or the number of people who drive cars increase substantially

A. In Jalica, domestically produced oil is more expensive than imported oil. - Irrelevant - we are not concerned about the costs

B. The Jalican government did not intend the new fuel-eﬁiciency requirement to be a pollution- reduction measure. - Irrelevant - although pollution reduction was not a goal, it happened to be a by-product of new fuel efficiency requirement

C. Some pollution-control devices mandated in Jalica make cars less fuel-eﬁicient than they would be without those devices. - The argument does not discuss pollution control devices

D. The new regulation requires no change in the chemical formulation of ﬁmel for cars in Jalica. - Irrelevant

E. Jalicans who get cars that are more fuel-eﬂicient tend to do more driving than before. - Correct - if people tend to drive more now , then fuel consumption will increase

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 258
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 13:32
1
KUDOS
Hi Experts,

Can you explain why option C is incorrect? If some devices are less efficient, then the cars with such devices would cause more pollution. The option suggests that cause will take place ----> Effect won't

This hurts the argument. Doesn't it?
_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 147
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 23:16
5
KUDOS
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hi Experts,

Can you explain why option C is incorrect? If some devices are less efficient, then the cars with such devices would cause more pollution. The option suggests that cause will take place ----> Effect won't

This hurts the argument. Doesn't it?

The key is "some" here, which can be as low as one in a sample space of 100.

So, if 1 or 2 car/cars is less efficient in a sample space of 10,000 cars - then does it hurt the conclusion ?

Cheers !!
_________________

If you find my posts/replies helpful, please take a moment to click on the "kudos" icon.

Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2018, 21:03
Hi Skywalker

I understand how you might argue answer B to be irrelevant. But does this point not make the argument irrelevant and, thus, weaker? Weakest?

I would have happily gone in the direction of something to do with pollution control, etc, etc for my answer. But the subject of the Government statement is not about reduction of pollution, rather the reduction of dependence on imported oil.

I feel like the question, "which of the following... MOST seriously weakens the argument?" is subjective and if the subject of the government statement is dependence on imported oil, I feel like answer (B) makes the entire argument irrelevant is the most correct (my subjective experience) and all the other answers only weaken the argument.

Due to the fact that the government went from reduction of dependence to pollution reduction would suggest to the trained eye that either the statement maker is unreliable or lying, thus, not credible > irrelevant. Again, the subject of this argument is reduction of dependence on oil, not pollution control.

I also feel like answer E could be correct but your explanation ("Correct - if people tend to drive more now , then fuel consumption will increase ") does nothing to address reduction of independence on imported oil which is the subject of the argument.

And the books justification to the correct answer does little to shed light, "a government policy may have consequences that the government did not intent it to have." What consequences? And how does this justify that answer B is less correct than E? If the "consequences" are more driving (more dependence on imported oil), is this not weakening the argument?

Maybe I'm missing something.

Is E the correct answer because more driving creates more pollution and increases a dependency on imported oil?

I'd like to suss out what GMAC is looking for most in an answer.

Thanks in advance to anyone that can help.

Eric

In order to reduce dependence on imported oil, the government of Jalica has imposed minimum fuel-efficiency requirements on all new cars, beginning this year. The more fuel-efficient a car, the less pollution it produces per mile driven. As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars that meet the new requirements, annual pollution from car traffic is likely to decrease in Jalica.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars with new fuel - efficiency standards, fuel consumption will decrease and thus annual pollution from car traffic will decrease
- The argument assumes the fuel consumption will not increase - either the people drive more now or the number of people who drive cars increase substantially

A. In Jalica, domestically produced oil is more expensive than imported oil. - Irrelevant - we are not concerned about the costs

B. The Jalican government did not intend the new fuel-eﬁiciency requirement to be a pollution- reduction measure. - Irrelevant - although pollution reduction was not a goal, it happened to be a by-product of new fuel efficiency requirement

C. Some pollution-control devices mandated in Jalica make cars less fuel-eﬁicient than they would be without those devices. - The argument does not discuss pollution control devices

D. The new regulation requires no change in the chemical formulation of ﬁmel for cars in Jalica. - Irrelevant

E. Jalicans who get cars that are more fuel-eﬂicient tend to do more driving than before. - Correct - if people tend to drive more now , then fuel consumption will increase

Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2018
Posts: 2
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2018, 07:32
Skywalker18 wrote:
In order to reduce dependence on imported oil, the government of Jalica has imposed minimum fuel-efficiency requirements on all new cars, beginning this year. The more fuel-efficient a car, the less pollution it produces per mile driven. As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars that meet the new requirements, annual pollution from car traffic is likely to decrease in Jalica.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - As Jalicans replace their old cars with cars with new fuel - efficiency standards, fuel consumption will decrease and thus annual pollution from car traffic will decrease
- The argument assumes the fuel consumption will not increase - either the people drive more now or the number of people who drive cars increase substantially

A. In Jalica, domestically produced oil is more expensive than imported oil. - Irrelevant - we are not concerned about the costs

B. The Jalican government did not intend the new fuel-eﬁiciency requirement to be a pollution- reduction measure. - Irrelevant - although pollution reduction was not a goal, it happened to be a by-product of new fuel efficiency requirement

C. Some pollution-control devices mandated in Jalica make cars less fuel-eﬁicient than they would be without those devices. - The argument does not discuss pollution control devices

D. The new regulation requires no change in the chemical formulation of ﬁmel for cars in Jalica. - Irrelevant

E. Jalicans who get cars that are more fuel-eﬂicient tend to do more driving than before. - Correct - if people tend to drive more now , then fuel consumption will increase

Sir,
Why is the A irrelevant? the first line clearly states that the purpose of the government's new policy implementation is to reduce the dependence of the country on Imported oil. The cost of imported oil being more than the domestic oil has a direct role to play here.

Secondly, since the new cars made are more fuel efficient, shouldn't the extra miles driven get balanced with the previous outcome?
Re: Fuel Efficient Requirments in Jalica: OG Verbal 2016   [#permalink] 26 Feb 2018, 07:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by