Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 23:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# G: The group of works exhibited in this year's Metropolitan

Author Message
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 08:38
Can somebody of you explain why not D, since it is also supporting the GÂ¡'s allegation of bias
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 117
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 08:53
Choice D does not support G's allegation of bias at all, because G is alleging that there is a bias in the choice of works EXHIBITED. Whether or not there is a bias in the REVIEWS of the show is irrelevant.

The general principle for test takers is that you must understand the conclusion accurately and specifically in order to avoid wrong answers.
_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1034
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 613 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 09:04
grumpyoldman wrote:
Choice D does not support G's allegation of bias at all, because G is alleging that there is a bias in the choice of works EXHIBITED. Whether or not there is a bias in the REVIEWS of the show is irrelevant.

The general principle for test takers is that you must understand the conclusion accurately and specifically in order to avoid wrong answers.

Point noted, Sir Grumpy
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 158
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 09:31
Another B.
Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 113
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 11:47
To grumpy: wow... that explained many things

grumpyoldman wrote:
Notice that G's evidence does NOT say that an equal number of works of each type were submitted. It says that an equal number of ARTISTS of each type submitted works (and that no artist submitted more than one type of work). His second piece of evidence is that more photographic WORKS were displayed than the other types. His conclusion is that there was "bias".

Key point I’ve missed: “each artist was allowed to submit one work” i.e. a sculptor could submit not a sculpture!

grumpyoldman wrote:
But let's stop and understand what that one-word conclusion really means. It actually means "the proportion of photographic WORKS displayed exceeded the proportion of PHOTOGRAPHERS because of a deliberate action by the organizers". In other words, this is a standard cause-and-effect conclusion, although well hidden. The conclusion is that the organizers' actions CAUSED the disproportionate number of photographs to be displayed.

Did not see organizers' fault here:
Info extracted from G's evidence: = # of Ph-s, Sc-s, Pa-s; each - only one work; More pics shown
G's conclusion: bias (organizers showed more pics maybe?)

grumpyoldman wrote:
H weakens this by saying that the organizers did NOT preferentially select photographs over other works; instead, every work submitted that met the criteria was displayed. Thus, he provides another cause for the difference, other than actions by the organizers. This other (proposed) cause is simply that more eligible photographic WORKS were submitted. Providing an alternative cause is, of course, the most common way of weakening a cause-and-effect argument.

H's evidence: all submited works were shown (thus not organizers fault)
didn't spot the cause-and-effect argument at first...

grumpyoldman wrote:
So in order to strengthen G again, we need a fact which says that the organizers' actions did cause, or could have caused, the disproportion. BUT this fact must be consistent with all the evidence that already exists! So we are NOT actually ignoring the evidence; we must fully recognize it and accept it. That is, we must find a fact which not only makes the organizers' actions a probable cause of the disproportion, but also does NOT contradict any of G's or H's evidence.
Clearly, only B does this.

This LSAT-type question would be somewhat rare on the GMAT. The GMAT usually makes cause-and-effect conclusions easier to see and understand than this one is.

tnx and kudos to you.
Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 113
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2008, 11:50
grumpyoldman wrote:
The general principle for test takers is that you must understand the conclusion accurately and specifically in order to avoid wrong answers.

thats the key!
Re: CR: Metropolitan Art Show   [#permalink] 30 Oct 2008, 11:50

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 5 19 Jan 2011, 06:20
Rainfall in the drought plagued metropolitan area was 7 14 Jun 2010, 09:17
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 13 16 Jun 2009, 12:00
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 14 22 Oct 2011, 13:49
Rainfall in the drought plagued metropolitan area was 4 02 Sep 2007, 21:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by