GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Oct 2018, 18:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 39
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V38
GPA: 3.1
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2016, 08:38
The question can be quantified into the following equation:-

Scientists regard Colleague when there is similar Motivation

Scientists regard No Colleague when he is Popular

Assumption :- If he is popular then he is not motivated

Hence D

(P.S. i just visualized what sheldon cooper would have said?)
Current Student
Status: DONE!
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 384
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2016, 08:25
1
D is correct. Here's why:

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues --> this isn't the author's argument; he never alludes to cooperation being necessary to be deemed a "true colleague"

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy --> irrelevant

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research --> true, but this doesn't mean that that individual is not motivated

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research --> BINGO!; if you aren't motivated to do new research, then you aren't a "true colleague"

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists --> irrelevant
Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Other (Computer Software)
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2016, 02:15

Conclusion - popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague
Premise - scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences

Here is the logic gap:

If other scientists consider all popularizers to be someone, who is not motivated to carry out new research, then, those people or individuals can't be collegues.

The above logic has to be true for conclusion to hold true. Hence, d is the right answer.
Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2017, 03:42
Clearly,It's D.

Took some time(3 mins) to understand though
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 86
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2017, 09:27
POV of scientists:
True Colleagues = someone doing important new research
Popularizer != True Colleagues
Hence, Popularizer != someone doing important new research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
_________________

If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!

Intern
Status: 800 and more!
Joined: 11 Apr 2017
Posts: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.75
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2017, 21:30
I agree the answer is D though c is close. But here we are talking about colleagues. And the only information we are provided for a colleague is that he is motivated to do the important new research. Now, he won't be a colleague if he is not motivated.
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2017, 03:53
(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues - INCORRECT - out of scope

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy- INCORRECT - envy is too strong a word!

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research- INCORRECT- this can be true but nowhere in the passage this is mentioned

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research- RIGHT!

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists - Irrelevant
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2017, 06:19
Situation: Research scientists desire to do important new research and treat as colleagues just those who have a similar desire. When a scientist becomes popular among a general audience for explaining principles of science, other scientists have less esteem for this popularizer, no longer regarding such a scientist as a serious colleague.

Reasoning: What assumption do research scientists make about scientists who become popularizers?

D is correct - The statement properly identifies an assumption on which the explanation for scientists' rejection of popularizers depends.
_________________

Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 19
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2018, 05:35
1
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists[/quote]

PREMISES:
1. Research scientists want to do important new research.
2. Other research scientists are considered as colleagues if they also want to do important new research (similar motivation).

CONCLUSION:
When a scientist becomes famous among the general public for explaining scientific principles, he/she (popularizer) should not be regarded as a colleague by other scientists.

PRE-THINK:
As the premise says that a scientist should do important new research to be considered as a colleague, and that popularizers are doing research to be famous, so these popularizers are not doing important new research (assumed by the scientific community).

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues.
We are concerned as to why a popularizer is not regarded as a colleague. Working by themselves or in groups does not connect the premises and the conclusion.

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy.
The passage does not talk about "envy".

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research.
"HOW" a scientist becomes a famous popularizer is not our concern; we want to know why they are not considered as a true colleague.

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research.
This matches with our pre-thinking.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists.
"access and assessment of new research by non-scientists" is not talked about in the passage.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1169
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2018, 03:28
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
-The argument is not about research but rather regarding scientists themselves

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
-Incorrect

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
-The argument is not about how the scientists can become popularizer

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
-Correct. Since popular scientists don't have motivation that's why other scientists disregard them.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
-Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!

Preparing for RC my way

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 139
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2018, 06:41
Here is the explanation
Goal: doing important research; accepts colleagues who have similar motivation or similar goal
When a scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences his goals have changed and he no longer has the goal of doing important research. This is the hidden information and assumed by other scientist while concluding that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
This doesn’t offer any grounds to connect to the conclusion. Irrelevant. We don’t need to assume what serious scientific research relies on.

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy.
Irrelevant again.

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
Why on earth do we need to know this. Completely out of focus.

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
Ture. If research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are motivated to do important new research, they can very well be called as colleagues and it shatters the “most other scientists’ “ conclusion.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
Accessibility doesn’t matter. Eliminate this option.
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 35
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2018, 01:15
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
its opposite

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
connecting envy and acceptance of collgue. out of scope

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
even becoming popular without imp research can also be collegue if they share common goal stated above.
gimmick: irrelevant

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
correct.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
its talking abt scientist vs non scientist. not relevant
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of &nbs [#permalink] 09 Oct 2018, 01:15

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by