GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 22 Jan 2020, 05:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1188
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Sep 2017, 21:55
2
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:58) correct 59% (02:20) wrong based on 336 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.

Source: LSAT

_________________
Non progredi est regredi

Originally posted by Akela on 24 Sep 2017, 21:33.
Last edited by broall on 24 Sep 2017, 21:55, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 13
Reviews Badge
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 06:35
1
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.
_________________
NOW OR NEVER
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1307
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:29
1
1
Masshole wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?


(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.
_________________
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1193
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 19:19
david2099 wrote:
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.


Hi,

Could you please elaborate your answer? Bacteria are living creatures only. So, why did you choose D?

Regards
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 124
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:14
broall can you explain this one ? :/
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1193
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:43
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 124
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:58
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1307
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 21:54
gmatexam439 wrote:
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards


You take the wrong argument. The argument is highlighted. Hope this helps!

kunalsinghNS wrote:
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?


The argument doesn't mention anything about bacteria, but this answer choice does. This choice provides some extra information that does weaken the argument.
_________________
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1193
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2017, 07:11
Still not convinced with the answer. Bacteria are living organisms that definitely indicate the past/present of the living species.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 482
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2018, 00:44
1
1
gmatexam439 wrote:
Still not convinced with the answer. Bacteria are living organisms that definitely indicate the past/present of the living species.


Geologist's Argument: Their (scientists') theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Scientists' theory is refuted. So, what is scientists' theory? Scientists' theory is that petroleum is formed from deep carbon deposits. So if scientists' theory is refuted, it becomes that petroleum is NOT formed from deep carbon deposits. Why? because the presence of molecules, the biomarkers, in petroleum.

We need to weaken the argument. We can do this by showing that petroleum is formed from deep carbon deposits or by showing that the presence of molecules in petroleum does not necessarily lead that petroleum is NOT formed from deep carbon deposits.

Only option D weakens the argument by saying that the presence of biomarkers in petroleum may be from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself (broall).
_________________
Hasan Mahmud
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Aug 2019
Posts: 20
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2019, 20:31
is option c strengthening the argument?
and how option D is weakening ?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3104
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2019, 17:14
Akshay2402 wrote:
is option c strengthening the argument?
and how option D is weakening ?

The passage sets up two conflicting views:

    The dominant view: “petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust” versus
    The view of certain scientists: “[petroleum] formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth”

After setting up these conflicting views, the geologist makes his/her main argument: the scientists’ theory “is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.”

So, the geologist’s main point is that some evidence (the presence of biomarkers) goes against the scientists’ view. It does so by supporting the “dominant view” -- essentially, the geologist says “Look, there are biomarkers in petroleum that indicate the presence of living beings. This shows that petroleum formed from fossilized plants/animals, and that the other scientists were wrong.”

The question asks us which answer choice weakens the geologist’s argument.

First, take a look at (D):
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.

Hmm. The geologist used those biomarkers to support the idea that petroleum came from fossilized plants/animals. (D) opens up another possibility -- maybe those biomarkers were actually just remnants of bacteria in the earth’s crust.

In that case, the geologist’s evidence is thrown into doubt -- perhaps the other scientists are right after all, and petroleum came from deep carbon deposits in which some bacteria happened to thrive. This means that the scientists’ theory would NOT be refuted by the biomarkers, and overall the geologist’s argument would be greatly weakened. (D) is the correct answer.

Quote:
(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.

The geologist supports the view that petroleum formed from fossilized plants/animals, but he/she never mentions a timeline for this conversion process. (C) tells us that this transformation would take “many millions of years,” but that is totally compatible with the geologist’s claim.

(C) doesn't weaken the geologist's claim, so you can get rid of it.

I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 277
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2020, 13:36
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?


Weaken question

Pre-thinking

Common view: Petroleum originates from animal and plants

Scientists' view: Petroleum does not come from living organisms but from carbon

So the author claims that the scientists are wrong because in the petroleum biomakers are present.

In order to weaken the argument we should find an explanation that justifies the presence of biomakers in petroleum without strengthening the common belief.



POE:

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
Irrelevant

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
no impact on the argument

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
the how aspect is irrelevant here

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
This is a good candidate. It is important to stress that the fact that bacteria are living organisms does not go against the scientists' belief since for what we know bacteria do not contribute to petroleum formation and are inside of it by chance

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This option is wrong because now we have a petroleum composed both by elements of the common belief and by elements of the scientists' belief. Now we cannot choose a stand. Choice D on the other hand talks about an entity which is outside of the elements thought to make petroleum in the common belief.

GMAT Club Bot
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized   [#permalink] 01 Jan 2020, 13:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne