GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 05 Aug 2020, 05:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1386
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 00:23
2
5
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

54% (01:03) correct 46% (01:18) wrong based on 384 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2019
Posts: 2
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 17:20
1
I chose B.
George’s assumption is that campaign’s goal is eradication. So he said it will be not successful.
Shelly’s position is that the goal is not eradication, which means that George’s assumption is incorrect. B shall be answer.

On the other hand, D is weaker because Shelly never agree George’s idea. George claims this campaign is unsuccessful, whereas Shelly said it is successful.

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 502
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 01:04
dcummins wrote:
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

dcummins Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Posted from my mobile device
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1386
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 01:56
Arvind42 wrote:
dcummins wrote:
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

dcummins Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Posted from my mobile device

There's no "contradiction" though. She just points out that George misinterpreted the evidence. George argues that there's no point to the advertising campaign if "some" people can still drink and drive - i.e. unless there is absolute eradication.
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Director
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 502
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 02:00
dcummins wrote:
Arvind42 wrote:
dcummins wrote:
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

dcummins Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Posted from my mobile device

There's no "contradiction" though. She just points out that George misinterpreted the evidence. George argues that there's no point to the advertising campaign if "some" people can still drink and drive - i.e. unless there is absolute eradication.

There is contraction though. In how they arrive at the reasoning to say whether it is successful. George says unsuccessful while Shelly says successful
Director
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 502
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 02:01
1
Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1386
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 05 Jul 2020, 20:55
2
Arvind42 wrote:
Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

She doesn't contradict George's reasoning. She does go against his conclusion, not his reasoning, and she also partially agrees with his conclusion, but largely points out that George perhaps misinterpreted the goal of the campaign.
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:

Originally posted by dcummins on 15 Jun 2019, 02:27.
Last edited by dcummins on 05 Jul 2020, 20:55, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 502
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 02:36
dcummins wrote:
Arvind42 wrote:
Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Not sure why you repeated this post dude, but again She doesn't contradict George's reasoning. She does go against his conclusion, not his reasoning, and she also partially agrees with his conclusion, but largely points out that George perhaps misinterpreted the goal of the campaign.

Sorry the post got repeated. Was trying to get experts help on this. By mistake must have got repeated.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Posts: 113
GRE 1: Q158 V143
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 09:57
dcummins wrote:
Arvind42 wrote:
Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Not sure why you repeated this post dude, but again She doesn't contradict George's reasoning. She does go against his conclusion, not his reasoning, and she also partially agrees with his conclusion, but largely points out that George perhaps misinterpreted the goal of the campaign.

Hi dcummins,

Shelly just only said that complete eradication is not the main goal insted the goal is to reduce drink and drive.Shelly no where said that the program will not be partially successfull.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2018
Posts: 54
Location: India
Schools: IMD 2021 Intake
GPA: 4
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 23:23
Why option C is wrong?

It says that Shelly partially agrees with George's main conclusion that Drink-n-drive cannot be completely eradicated, whereas disagrees with the reasoning given by George.

Posted from my mobile device
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1386
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2019, 23:36
vishumangal wrote:
dcummins wrote:
Arvind42 wrote:
Feel that E is better than D.

What is successful- reduction or elimination- depends on the objective of the task. George relies on the wrong objective to say the campaign will be unsuccessful while Shelly corrects him, which is in line with option E

Not sure why you repeated this post dude, but again She doesn't contradict George's reasoning. She does go against his conclusion, not his reasoning, and she also partially agrees with his conclusion, but largely points out that George perhaps misinterpreted the goal of the campaign.

Hi dcummins,

Shelly just only said that complete eradication is not the main goal insted the goal is to reduce drink and drive.Shelly no where said that the program will not be partially successfull.

Posted from my mobile device

The easiest thing to do is imagine two people actually talking and having a conversation.

Before Shelly to responds with 'the goal is reduction', she actually first acknowledges what George said - that complete eradication is impossible otherwise she would respond by refuting what George said in some way.
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 5033
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2019, 02:20
Ritwick91 wrote:
Why option C is wrong?

It says that Shelly partially agrees with George's main conclusion that Drink-n-drive cannot be completely eradicated, whereas disagrees with the reasoning given by George.

Posted from my mobile device

George's conclusion is that the campaign will not be successful as drink driving will continue....

Shelly states that the expected outcome for the success of the campaign is not complete eradication but reduction in the incidence of drunk driving...

Thus, Shelly doesn't accept the highlighted part of the conclusion arrived at by George , hence correct Answer can not be (C)
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Intern
Status: Classified
Joined: 19 Jun 2019
Posts: 33
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2019, 03:07
Could you explain how Shelly "partially" agrees with George?
_________________
Best
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 200
GPA: 3.3
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2020, 10:15
dcummins wrote:
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

Would anyone help me to get the explanation why B is incorrect?
Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 159
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2020, 09:59
dcummins wrote:
George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful. Some people are just immune to these campaigns and will drink and drive no matter what.

Shelly: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.

Shelly responds to George by:

(A) questioning the veracity of George’s evidence
(B) suggesting that George’s conclusion is based on incorrect assumptions
(C) partially agreeing with George’s main conclusion but disagreeing with his reasoning
(D) partially agreeing with George’s point of view but suggesting that he has overlooked a beneficial effect
(E) contradicting George’s reasoning and supplying an alternative reasoning

i think it should be "B". the issue with "D" is shelly never agree what geroge said.
So the options in which it is saying that " partially agreeing" i think should not be correct.

Please correct me where i am wrong.
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2020
Posts: 5
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2020, 19:07
Finally, a question I can understand. Thank you guys for the explanation.
Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2020, 06:48
Well i believe option B should be an answer becauss he assumes that goal is complete eradication which shally refutes so basically she is refuting his assumption

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2020, 06:48
Well i believe option B should be an answer becauss he assumes that goal is complete eradication which shally refutes so basically she is refuting his assumption

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 18
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2020, 03:17
Why is B incorrect? In D,Isn't george's point of view his main conclusion. Shelly doesn't agree with his conclusion even partially. she feels campaign will be successfull.
Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2019
Posts: 51
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.3
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2020, 03:32
saro wrote:
Why is B incorrect? In D,Isn't george's point of view his main conclusion. Shelly doesn't agree with his conclusion even partially. she feels campaign will be successfull.

shelly agrees that drunk driving can not be completely erected. George consider that campaign should completely eradicate drunk driving.
partially they will achieve object by reduction in drunk drive.

so shelly partially agrees and suggests they will achieve some reduction.
Re: George: The anti-drunk driving campaigns will not be successful   [#permalink] 31 May 2020, 03:32

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]