It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Give it a try...

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2007, 12:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Give it a try....
_________________

Who is John Galt?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 506

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 0

Location: Indonesia

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2007, 12:59
D should be the answer, as it supports the conclusion drawn from first study.

regards,

Amardeep

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2007, 13:20
For me the answer should be "B"..What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - TV Aggression [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 07:42
I would pick C..

what is the OA ?

X & Y wrote:
Give it a try....

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 08:06
Amardeep Sharma wrote:
D should be the answer, as it supports the conclusion drawn from first study.

regards,

Amardeep

How?

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - TV Aggression [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 16:08
Vote C

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 16:35
I would go with (C).

It clearly give us an idea about 2 different cases.

(B) is out because the topic is related to the similar communities.

(D) is also out. The first study describes the short-term exposure but the second study gives us insight about the children who had already got used to watch TV for a long time.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 17:15
D.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2007, 19:44
I'll take C.

In the passage, we're only told the second community that has been exposed to tv shows for decades did not show any change in aggression rate.

From this, we can only conclude C, because the second community only tells us the aggression rate will not increase over decades, nevermind the increase in the first early stages of exposure to tv.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 00:37
I vote for C.

Eventhough the short term exposure increases the agression, the long term exposure to television moderates the agression, shown in the second study.

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 07:38
OA is D. You guys think this is a 400, 500, 600 or 700 question?
_________________

Who is John Galt?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 07:46
how can it be D? what's the OE.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 08:07
ywilfred wrote:
how can it be D? what's the OE.

I remember having read this question and its explanation some time ago and I was not convinced. If I remember correctly the explanation was something like this. Choice D does not contradict the conclusion drawn by the study. Hence choice D supports the conclusion drawn in the study.

So there...

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 08:27
Here is the OE.

Ans D.

(D) This is a complicated question and requires a complicated explanation. It is important to keep in mind just what the reported results are. Perhaps most important, nothing is said about the absolute values of the aggression rates, but only about changes in the rates. And nothing is said about how the rates in the other two communities compared with those of the first. The first study correlated two changes-the change from no TV to TV in 1973, as well as the change in aggression rates from 1973 to 1975. The tentative conclusion is that the first of these changes was the cause of the second change. The second study focused on communities in which there was no change --they were already well accustomed to TV in 1973. (Thus the second study focuses on a sort of natural "control group.") That study found that there was no change of the second type - aggression rates in those communities remained constant from 1973 to 1975. The second study thus tends to reduce the plausibility of the suggestion that some change other than the introduction of TV caused the rise in aggressiveness in the first community. If there was some other cause, at least it doesn't seem to have been acting in the communities of the second study. And that reduces the range of possible candidates. Thus the second study tends to make more probable the conclusion drawn from the first study.

Hope it helps.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 08:46
Certainly NG; The explanation is very well drafted. Do you guys have the source of this question and also could you share more such questions (along with their explanations after we have tried to answer those questions).

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 09:10
It is form one of the exams of 800score
_________________

Who is John Galt?

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1552

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 09:16
X & Y wrote:
It is form one of the exams of 800score

Does the OE also explain why C is incorrect?

I think C is a better answer.

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 09:47
It seems pretty twisted to me... just because of the fact that if there are other causes of aggression but since it's not showing up in the control group, it is still a stretch to say the only reason is because tv caused aggression and thus supports what is concluded in the first study...

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - TV Aggression [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2007, 09:58
I see now. Very good one.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - TV Aggression   [#permalink] 03 Apr 2007, 09:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by