It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 10:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 03:08
bb wrote:
GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33
Field: word problems (mixture)
Difficulty: 650
 Rating:

A kilogram of nut mixture contains X% chestnuts and Y% walnuts and sells for \$7.00/kg. If the ratio of chestnuts is increased by 50% so that the new mixture is sold for \$8.00/kg, what is the price of a kg of walnuts?

A. \$1.00
B. \$2.50
C. \$5.00
D. \$7.50
E. \$10.00

I hate to bump an old thread but isn't there an issue re. what it means to "increase a ratio by 50%"? "Increasing a ratio" by 50% would e.g. involve increasing a ratio of 2:3 to 1:1 (e.g. we go from 0.66*1.5 = 1). THAT is a 50% increase in a ratio. Using a plugging in numbers approach, a movement from a 40% / 60% mixture ratio to a 50% / 50% ratio would represent an increase in the ratio by 50%. Yet this cannot satisfy any of the answer choices. The (1.5X) to (1-1.5X) answer used by gmat tiger is potentially troublesome as it can lead to negative quantities for the Walnut side.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Russian Federation
Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2013, 14:43
(a1) X/100=c/(w+c)
(a2) Y/100=w/(w+c)=(100-X)/100

(b1) A price of c
(b2) B price of w

(c1) Ac+Bw=7(c+w)
(c2) Ac/(c+w)+Bw/(c+w)=7

(d1) AX/100+B(100-X)/100=7
(d2) A1.5X/100+B(100-1.5X)/100=8
*substitute c/(c+w) with X/100, and w/(w+c) with (100-X)/100

(e1) A0.5X/100-B0.5/100=1
*subtract d1 from d2
(e2) 200=AX-BX
(e3) 200+BX=AX

(f1) (200+BX)/100+B(100-X)/100=7
*substitute AX in d1 with e3
(f2) 700=200+BX+100B-BX
(f3) 500=100B

(g1) B=5
*the price of a kg of w

To avoid ambiguity stem should have STATED that the "proportion" of c in the mixture OR that the ratio of c to the whole mixture IS increased by 50%.

Hope this helps!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2013, 21:27
Survival wrote:
(a1) X/100=c/(w+c)
(a2) Y/100=w/(w+c)=(100-X)/100

(b1) A price of c
(b2) B price of w

(c1) Ac+Bw=7(c+w)
(c2) Ac/(c+w)+Bw/(c+w)=7

(d1) AX/100+B(100-X)/100=7
(d2) A1.5X/100+B(100-1.5X)/100=8
*substitute c/(c+w) with X/100, and w/(w+c) with (100-X)/100

(e1) A0.5X/100-B0.5/100=1
*subtract d1 from d2
(e2) 200=AX-BX
(e3) 200+BX=AX

(f1) (200+BX)/100+B(100-X)/100=7
*substitute AX in d1 with e3
(f2) 700=200+BX+100B-BX
(f3) 500=100B

(g1) B=5
*the price of a kg of w

To avoid ambiguity stem should have STATED that the "proportion" of c in the mixture OR that the ratio of c to the whole mixture IS increased by 50%.

Hope this helps!

Gotcha. Although it's worth pointing out that the text in the question isn't ambiguous - it's just plain wrong. Your amendments would correct it, however.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Looking to improve
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 174

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 65

GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2013, 12:33
How about using some logical reasoning rather than pure algebra.

E.g. X% and Y% mixture costs \$7 and X% is increased by 50% => 1.5X% in the mixture increases the price by 1\$.

A 50% increase in X results in a \$1 increase in price. This implies the cost X% is \$2 since 50% of \$2 is \$1. Hence the cost for Y% is \$7 - \$2 = \$5.

Answer is C.

Any comments on fallacy of this approach...
_________________

KUDOS is a way to say Thank You

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 65

Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 35

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2013, 01:46
I wonder if Bunuel or Karishma can provide their ways to this problem... Admittedly, GMAT TIGER's way is fairly clear...just wonder if there is a more concise way. Thanks.
_________________

There are times when I do not mind kudos...I do enjoy giving some for help

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 35

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41894

Kudos [?]: 129127 [0], given: 12194

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2013, 01:51
obs23 wrote:
I wonder if Bunuel or Karishma can provide their ways to this problem... Admittedly, GMAT TIGER's way is fairly clear...just wonder if there is a more concise way. Thanks.

This question is removed from the database.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 129127 [0], given: 12194

Re: GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33   [#permalink] 17 Sep 2013, 01:51

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 46 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# GMAT Diagnostic Test Question 33

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.