It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 13:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends!

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 21 [5], given: 19

Location: Australia
Schools: Chicago Booth class of 2012
WE 1: Consulting
WE 3: Strategy - Large Corporate
GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2009, 18:40
5
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Below are the questions I responded to and my answer. Any help would be muchly appreciated, this is my first shot at the AWAs and my GMAT is tomorrow!!!

AWA Argument

The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods:
“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

Olympic Foods has stated that, ‘Over time, costs of processing go down as as organisations learn how to do things better’, to demonstrate that Olympic Food’s long experience will result in minimized costs and maximized profits for the company. This argument is flawed for three key reasons. The parallel example used is for a technological process which is distinguished from a food process. The logical end is profit maximisation which does not consider other factors which impact profits, such as competition. Finally, while the initial premise is correct in regards to continuous process improvement, there is no justification as to how this is manifested in the Olympic Foods factory.

Firstly, the technological process discuss has some important differences to the processing of food. The argument uses the reduction in film processing times and price over a 14 year period, from 170 to 1984, to indicate that significant savings in costs of processing can be made over long periods. However, cameras were a relatively niche and expensive technology in 1970, and the popularity of cameras and film increased significantly in the period referred to, which brought with it a large increase in demand for film processing. Hence, the cost reduction implied by the price decrease may be partly due to scale, and partly due to production efficiencies. The Olympic Foods example does not mention any scale advantages – also, it is unlikely that the demand for food has increased as exponentially as the demand for film.

Secondly, Input prices are also a factor in evaluating the relevance of the film processing parallel. The price of the paper for printing photos also dropped substantially over the period, due to massive increases in demand and efficiencies in the process for manufacturing the photo paper. Conversely, the price of food has been steadily increasing over the last 50 years. The factors make the film processing example a poor analogy to argue that the cost of producing food is lower.

Thirdly, the final stage of the argument in the Olympic Foods annual report implies that cost minimization is the key factor in maximization of profits. Some other key items that affect profits have been excluded, such as levels of competition, price of available substitutes and consumer demand.

In conclusion, while Olympic Foods may have reduced its food processing costs over the last 25 years, the statements in the annual report extract do not substantiate this. The example given regarding film processing is poorly linked to the Olympic Foods business and no relevant example from the business itself is included – which would improve the argument substantially. A full description of the relevant market conditions, and the relative performance Olympic Foods against competitors would prove more substantive evidence to argue that Olympic Foods has improved processing costs. Based on this argument, it is unlikely that stockholders will be convinced that Olympic Foods’ long history will have a direct impact on its overall performance.

AWA - Issue

“In some countries, television and radio programs are carefully censored for offensive language and behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.”
In your view, to what extent should government or any other group be able to censor television or radio programs?
Explain, giving relevant reasons and/or examples to support your position.

Governments or other groups should only be able to censor television or radio to a limited extent. Free speech must be protected by a nation’s media outlets, but offensive language and behaviour can have a negative effect on the behaviour of the population, or some segments of the population, if no censoring occurs. The people watching television cannot always be trusted to make the best decisions on what they should watch. Television and radio are often examples to the rest of the population and maintaining a level of decency and some moral standards in this programming will benefit the population as a whole.

Firstly, society is highly influenced by what is on TV and radio. There have been several examples of ‘copycat’ style offences, where the initial event is publicised or first shown on the TV or heard on the radio. The proliferation of media in mainsteam society provides easy access for anyone to these entertainment devices. Overly violent movies can provide the necessary impetus for a person to commit a crime, and the likelihood of the event being televised makes committing a crime even more appealing for some people. There have been instances where violent criminals have cited television programs or movies as a factor in their criminal actions.

Other members of society are equally affected by indiscriminate access to violence and offensive behaviour. Children has limited ability to discern right from wrong, and during their formative years appropriate behaviour must be encouraged to create good habits and strong morals in children. Seeing violent police shows, swearing and fighting on television may give the impression that this behaviour is acceptable in society. This could be prevented with some appropriate censorship based on the hours that some television shows are programmed, as is the case in Australia, where violent movies are only allowed on television late at night. It could be argued that parents should have the responsibility for monitoring their children’s television viewing habits, but occasionally parents are not available to play this role.

Finally, television and radio have an important role in promoting the ideals of a society. Having programming with strong values and morally upstanding characters can help promote the overall behaviour of a society. Mormons, for example, do not have televisions in their society because they are trying to promote a certain standard of behaviour that is not supported by modern television programming. Radio shock jocks, like John Laws in Australia, have the impact of lowering the general standards of the population in terms of their boundaries for disgusting and obscene behaviour, by promoting this behaviour on the radio. This effectively desensitizes the public to this obscene behaviour and makes it more acceptable and less shocking in everyday life. If Governments could censor this type of radio show, the public would be less likely to view obscene behaviour as an acceptable standard.

There is definitely such thing as going too far, when free speech is limited. The ideal framework for censorship is one that is voted for an approved by the general population, which takes into account some different levels of censorship, and generally promotes free speech where it is not obscene or offensive. Australia has a very effective ‘Code of Practice’ model that requires licensing for radio shows and hands out fines to offending shows that breach the Code of Practice. Television shows are also assessed on this framework and required to maintain standards, with more relaxed standards at different times of the day – such as late at night, when children are unlikely to be watching television. Appropriately applied, censorship of television and radio programs is favourable and appropriate, and can benefit the community as a whole.

Kudos [?]: 21 [5], given: 19

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15433

Kudos [?]: 27897 [1], given: 5043

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2009, 02:26
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Love the Argument essay - enjoyed reading it. Great job and a great topic - what a flaw!
I would dedicate a bit more time to your point #3 - that one seems to be a big flaw of its own that could be developed even further and also make the third paragraph look not so short. Only suggestion I have is to use "For example" or "For instance" - those are some of the trigger words that booth a human reader and computer like. You could easily plug them in, for example in the area where you mentioned photo paper price decrease.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

GMAT Club's Special offer for Student Loans only through Aug 31 - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Kudos [?]: 27897 [1], given: 5043

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 19

Location: Australia
Schools: Chicago Booth class of 2012
WE 1: Consulting
WE 3: Strategy - Large Corporate
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2009, 06:09
Thank you! I will include these points. Will report back in the 'Share your Experience' thread...

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 19

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15433

Kudos [?]: 27897 [0], given: 5043

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2009, 09:16
sapphireka wrote:
Thank you! I will include these points. Will report back in the 'Share your Experience' thread...

Posted from my mobile device

Thanks! We'll be waiting
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

GMAT Club's Special offer for Student Loans only through Aug 31 - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Kudos [?]: 27897 [0], given: 5043

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15433

Kudos [?]: 27897 [0], given: 5043

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2009, 21:48
How did you do?
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

GMAT Club's Special offer for Student Loans only through Aug 31 - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Kudos [?]: 27897 [0], given: 5043

Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2013
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2013, 14:45
Could someone please evaluate my essay below and let me know where I could improve.
The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:
When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”

The argument made by the business department of Apogee Company that “centralization would improve profitability” is unjustified. There are other critical factors that need to be closely examined and taken into account, when making such an assumption. Profitability of a company depend on a varied number of contributors such as quality of deliverables, size of the customer base, how well placed Apogee is against its competitors, how low-priced its products and services offered are, and so on. Reducing operating costs by centralizing office location is just one dimension of the profitability paradigm and cannot be fully credited to improve profits.

Firstly, one could argue about the period when Apogee Company had its operations in one location. No supporting evidence has been provided. The writer could be referring to Apogee’s initial years as a start-up. So even though Apogee did not have multiple foot-prints at that time, profits could have been made, because of its innovative concept or superior service or a combination of some other drivers.
The argument still holds, even with the assumption that the period referred by the writer, was not Apogee’s initial years. Apogee could have been the only player in its area of business it supported. In this case of monopoly, profits can be realized, with sheer volume and a small margin on sales.

Secondly, the proposal to close all field offices and operate from a single location could have an adverse effect on Apogee’s business. Globalization has called for every company to have a wide-spread presence to reach to more customers and keep-up with competition. While technology enables online operations, it still holds true that certain businesses depend on human interaction and close association with the locals. The risks associated with lack of dispersion should be understood.
As an example, AT&T has virtually every service and product available for its customers online. However, it still operates with thousands of retail stores and more offices to make sure users get to interact with fully functioning products and avail real-time experience with its representatives. AT&T has had a steady growth over the past few years.
Therefore, Apogee may lose to its competitors, on accessibility, customer satisfaction, diversity and community engagement by closing its field offices.

Thirdly, the cost decrease by centralization does not warranty other expenses. The central location will have to be expanded to accommodate all employees and departments. This may mean re-hiring to find replacements for resources, not willing to relocate. Shipping and handling from various supply-chain partners will be an over-head as well. Delays in delivering goods will hurt the business or will have to be re-strategized. There are more similar expenses that can be listed which will prove disadvantageous to Apogee.

Lastly, the writer seems to give into the delusion that holding employees at a common location can help supervise them better. While this may come with some added benefits in managing worker groups, management bodies of many a firms have found efficient means to increase employee productivity while giving them the flexibility to work from remote locations. This has been a widely accepted practice, given the varied needs and demands of the work force. There are many practices to keep employees engaged at work and measure efficiency and effectiveness. As an example, most meetings these days are conducted via video conferences and remote sharing methods.

Finally, Apogee’s business management should re-evaluate its decision to close its field offices and conduct its operations from a single location. Analysis should be done in many other dimensions to propose a profitable business strategy. Studies should be conducted to assess why Apogee was profitable when it had only one location. There should be substantial evidence acquired and presented to prove that all other factors remain the same and that the single location was the only reason for its profitability. It’s almost unrealistic to be able to prove that, Hence, if the eventual goal is profitability and operational excellence, Apogee should focus on other means.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2013, 22:13
Very well written! This will be my bar to beat!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2014, 04:03
1. Over ¬time, the costs of processing of food go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5 inch print fell from 50 cents for five day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one day service in 1981. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experiences will enable us to minimize cost and this maximize profits.
- The argument by the Olympic Foods, the costs of processing of food go down because as the organization learns to do things better, they become efficient may seem logical at first glance. However, it omits some important concerns that must be taken in consideration to provide the information or evidence to prove the argument true. The statement that follows the description of how the costs of processing go down simply describes efficiency of the organization and long experiences of the organization. This does not give a logical argument in favor of the cost processing and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument.
First, the argument assumes learning how to do things better results efficiency, which in turn results in the costs of processing of food go down. Does this mean only learning of how to do things better helps in declining the costs? There may be other various factors for declining of the costs. Suppose, for example, the environment which might be the main reason for the costs declining. The environment plays a vital role in keeping the organization run smoothly. If the internal as well as the external environment is sound then the people working in the organization feel safe and are determined to perform better.
Secondly, the argument also states that the color film processing applies the same principle as the processing of food. In fact, the writer didn't clearly mention about the market. How much do we know about the market? Is there a chance that it is volatile? Moreover, the argument doesn't state that both the processing is measured in the same terms and conditions; it does not state whether the film processing and cost processing are linked with each other. And also there is no clear statement for the price decreasing from 50 cents to 20 cents. Is the price being decreased according to the service it is providing now and then? 50 cents for 5 days and 20 cents for 1 day, the price is decreasing according to the service it is providing for the number of days.
Finally, the argument provides no evidence that long experiences will enable the organization to minimize costs and maximize profits. The argument also did not address how well did the organization perform till 25 years. In its current form, the argument implies that the organization will be running in the same manner every year which will enable them in minimizing costs and maximizing profits. There is no certainty that, what happened in the organization every year will be happening in the same manner always.
The writer would not be wrong to conclude that doing things better they will be efficient and long experiences will enable them to minimize cost and this maximize profits. After all, the experience gained will help in overcoming the distraction or obstacles the organization might get in the near future. But in order to support the current conclusion the writer must first define the scope of the problem more clearly and demonstrate the sort of efficiency and experiences. If it included the items discussed above, the argument would have been more sound and convincing.
Attachments

1st self written essay.doc [30.5 KiB]

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2014
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

“Over time, the costs of processing go down because..." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2015, 05:59
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The argument has reasoned that greater experience corresponds to lower cost of operation which can lead to cost minimization and profit maximization, and in order to substantiate this argument the author has considered data from the film processing industry, and has extrapolated the results to assume they would apply to the food processing industry as well. Since, the argument has failed to consider other factors that lead to profit maximization and cost minimization, and because it has made a conclusion based on performance of an unrelated and an altogether different industry, this argument is fundamentally flawed.

Firstly, the argument has stated that Olympic Foods will be able to minimize costs and maximize of profits simply because of its 25 years of experience. It has not stated as to how exactly the company is going to achieve this feat. Cost minimization is definitely not dependent just on experience. It depends on factors like the prevalent rates of rent and maintenance, the cost and availability of land and labor, and the cost and supply of raw material. The argument does not state how Olympic Foods is going to control the cost and availability of these items. On the other hand profit maximization not just requires experience and cost minimization, it also requires demand for the product, economies of scale, well established supply chain, a good selling price etc. which the argument has not mentioned anything about. Moreover, the argument fails to mention competition as one of the most important factors responsible for price determination. The film processing industry during the said time may have been able to reduce costs as a result of reduction of input costs and the increasing popularity of photography which may have increased the demand of related products like cameras, films, chemicals etc. which in turn may have increased their production and due to economies of scale the production costs may have gone down resulting in a cascading effect on the whole industry as such. The argument has not presented any data pertaining to the demand for the products produced by Olympic Foods, or any other food processing company for that matter, and has not even said whether there is any likelihood for an increased demand for the same in the near future.

Secondly, while the argument may be right in assuming increased efficiency, technological advancement etc. as a factor responsible for reduced cost of film processing. It however fails to mention any such technological advancement made by Olympic Foods, or any other food processing company, that can bring about a similar effect with respect to its own products. Thirdly, the film processing industry is not affected by seasonal constraints and vagaries of nature as the food processing industry is. One unforeseen rainfall during harvesting season may ruin the entire wheat crop and call for imports which may take time and money thus affecting everything else downstream. For such reasons it is not plausible to extrapolate and draw conclusions for the performance of the food processing industry or Olympic Foods based on the performance of the film processing industry thereto.

All in all, the argument suffers from some serious flaws and if it incorporates the above-discussed points, it can be improved and thus be made more cogent.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2015, 01:58
Firstly, I liked both your essays. I surely think they were a 5 each.
Having said that, I have a question.
Is it okay, if we refer to instances specific to one's geographical location ? I am asking this coz its very possible that the human evaluationist would not be so familiar with the RJs from Australia in the 2nd essay above. Hence there is no way he can say whether the info you are referring to is valid or not.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10157

Kudos [?]: 253 [1], given: 0

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2016, 14:59
1
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 253 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1208

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 75

Location: India
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2016, 02:46
The argument above says that processing costs reduce with time due to increase in efficiency. The example of color film processing is taken and applied to food proceesing as well. With this data and lot of unreasonable assumptions, the report forecasts the minimal cost and maximum profit scenario.

Primarily, the report claims that the costs of processing go down with time since efficiency will improve with time. But the assumption underlying this statement is that the other costs such as maintenance costs, operating costs and other factors do not change. There is no information regarding the necessary measures taken to address the maintenacnce issues of macihincery or staff.
It is possible that machines will become old and wear down requiring a lot of maintenance and replacement may not be an available option, increasing costs of processing.

The author took an example of color film processing where cost of print reduced with certain time period and assumes that similar reduction can help to reduce costs and improve profits. But the flaw of the example can be seen if 50 cents per five days is equivalent to 10 cents per day whereas the second price is 20 cents per day which is higher than the initial one. While there can be plenty of factors which can result in this scenario and this increase need not be a damaging one, The decrease cannot be taken as an instance to make the argument valid.

Moreoever, While the above example does not make sense by itself, it can hardly apply for processing of food. Food processing also involves other factors such as food storage, contamination and other factors. With no such information, it is not feasible to make any assumptions and make a conclusion that only long experience will enable cost minimization and profit maximization.

The argument needs to consider many factors such as maintenenace costs, labour and maintenance cost conditions before making conclusion. Inorder to make profits, demand needs to increase and customer feedbacks are needed to make necessary changes. Moreover new changes may be needed to stay in demand in market and those may need further investment. Hence all these factors are required to support our conclusion without which the argument as is sounds completely absurd.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.

My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 75

Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2017, 22:53
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
The argument above says that processing costs reduce with time due to increase in efficiency. The example of color film processing is taken and applied to food proceesing as well. With this data and lot of unreasonable assumptions, the report forecasts the minimal cost and maximum profit scenario.

Primarily, the report claims that the costs of processing go down with time since efficiency will improve with time. But the assumption underlying this statement is that the other costs such as maintenance costs, operating costs and other factors do not change. There is no information regarding the necessary measures taken to address the maintenacnce issues of macihincery or staff.
It is possible that machines will become old and wear down requiring a lot of maintenance and replacement may not be an available option, increasing costs of processing.

The author took an example of color film processing where cost of print reduced with certain time period and assumes that similar reduction can help to reduce costs and improve profits. But the flaw of the example can be seen if 50 cents per five days is equivalent to 10 cents per day whereas the second price is 20 cents per day which is higher than the initial one. While there can be plenty of factors which can result in this scenario and this increase need not be a damaging one, The decrease cannot be taken as an instance to make the argument valid.

Moreoever, While the above example does not make sense by itself, it can hardly apply for processing of food. Food processing also involves other factors such as food storage, contamination and other factors. With no such information, it is not feasible to make any assumptions and make a conclusion that only long experience will enable cost minimization and profit maximization.

The argument needs to consider many factors such as maintenenace costs, labour and maintenance cost conditions before making conclusion. Inorder to make profits, demand needs to increase and customer feedbacks are needed to make necessary changes. Moreover new changes may be needed to stay in demand in market and those may need further investment. Hence all these factors are required to support our conclusion without which the argument as is sounds completely absurd.

Hi,

In the argument, the example given says the cost of a 3 by 5 inch print fell from 50 cents for five day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one day service in 1984. This means from 10 cents to 20 cents per day service. Correct?
In this case the example shows the cost has risen which is a discrepancy acc to me. But looks like i'm missing something here. Can you please comment?

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Intern
Status: Learning
Joined: 30 May 2017
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 36

Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.25
Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2017, 15:13
Chef wrote:
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
The argument above says that processing costs reduce with time due to increase in efficiency. The example of color film processing is taken and applied to food proceesing as well. With this data and lot of unreasonable assumptions, the report forecasts the minimal cost and maximum profit scenario.

Primarily, the report claims that the costs of processing go down with time since efficiency will improve with time. But the assumption underlying this statement is that the other costs such as maintenance costs, operating costs and other factors do not change. There is no information regarding the necessary measures taken to address the maintenacnce issues of macihincery or staff.
It is possible that machines will become old and wear down requiring a lot of maintenance and replacement may not be an available option, increasing costs of processing.

The author took an example of color film processing where cost of print reduced with certain time period and assumes that similar reduction can help to reduce costs and improve profits. But the flaw of the example can be seen if 50 cents per five days is equivalent to 10 cents per day whereas the second price is 20 cents per day which is higher than the initial one. While there can be plenty of factors which can result in this scenario and this increase need not be a damaging one, The decrease cannot be taken as an instance to make the argument valid.

Moreoever, While the above example does not make sense by itself, it can hardly apply for processing of food. Food processing also involves other factors such as food storage, contamination and other factors. With no such information, it is not feasible to make any assumptions and make a conclusion that only long experience will enable cost minimization and profit maximization.

The argument needs to consider many factors such as maintenenace costs, labour and maintenance cost conditions before making conclusion. Inorder to make profits, demand needs to increase and customer feedbacks are needed to make necessary changes. Moreover new changes may be needed to stay in demand in market and those may need further investment. Hence all these factors are required to support our conclusion without which the argument as is sounds completely absurd.

Hi,

In the argument, the example given says the cost of a 3 by 5 inch print fell from 50 cents for five day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one day service in 1984. This means from 10 cents to 20 cents per day service. Correct?
In this case the example shows the cost has risen which is a discrepancy acc to me. But looks like i'm missing something here. Can you please comment?

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

The service is measured as cost per day. Its measured by speed similar to shipping packages. It used to cost 50 cents and you had to wait 5 days, now it costs 20cents and you get the prints the same day.
_________________

Veritas Prep 6/18/17 600 Q:38 V:35 IR:5
Veritas Prep 6/29/17 620 Q:43 V:33 IR:4
Manhattan 7/12/17 640 Q:42 V:35 IR:2.4
Veritas Prep 7/27/17 640 Q:41 V:37 IR:4
Manhattan 8/9/17 670 Q:44 V:37 IR:3
Veritas Prep 8/21/17 660 Q:45 V:36 IR:7
GMAT Prep 8/23/17 700 Q:47 V:38 IR:8
GMAT Prep 8/27/17 730 Q:49 V:40 IR:8
Veritas Prep 8/30/17 690 Q:47 V:37 IR:8

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 36

Re: GMAT tomorrow - need AWA feedback my friends!   [#permalink] 28 Jun 2017, 15:13
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Need a Friend AWA Reviewer 0 13 Jun 2010, 06:49
1 Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA. 1 21 Nov 2013, 07:30
GMAT Tomorrow, please rate my AWA 0 13 Nov 2013, 04:30
GMAT tomorrow. My first AWA attempt is here. 1 15 Feb 2013, 12:43
Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! 5 05 Feb 2011, 08:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by