GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 21:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 10
The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2017, 02:39
2
Attachments

Screen Shot 2017-01-19 at 11.17.59 AM.png [ 88.95 KiB | Viewed 1949 times ]

Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 56
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Other)
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2017, 21:35
1
Schikler's supervisor is 10
10's supervisor is 6
6's supervisor is 14

That's it. Schikler has only 3 supervisors. So, NO.
Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2017, 05:46
2
1
Got this wrong as well. This is how i think its done:

- O'Neill:
-- First check: supervises no one: 8 (i.e. O'Neill's emp ID) is not present in column 5 -- condition 1 satisfied, now check 2
-- Second check: O'Neill's supervisors (following the supervisor employee IDs mentioned in the last column): 11 >> 4 >> 9 >> 1 >> 6 >> 14 (read as "No.11 supervises O'Neill, 4 supervises 9, 1 supervises 9, and so on) - 14 doesn't count has no.14 is not in HR so 11,4,9,1,6 = 5 supervisors -- check 2 satisfied hence "Yes"

- Patel:
-- First check: Patel's employee ID (i.e. 7) does not feature in column 5 -- cond 1 satisfied, check 2
-- Second check: same as before naming supervisor employee IDs for patel: 3 >> 1 >> 6 >> 14 therefore 4 supervisors -- cond. 2 not satisfied hence "No"

- Schickler:
-- First check: schickler's employee ID does not feature in column 5 -- cond 1 satisfied, check 2
-- Second check: same as before naming supervisor employee IDs for schickler: 10 >> 6 >> 14 therefor 2 supervisors -- cond. 2 no satisfied hence "No"

Surprisingly we dont need to use the hire data here. Any other thoughts?
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res &nbs [#permalink] 13 Oct 2017, 05:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.