GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 21:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 10
The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2017, 02:39
2
Can Someone please explain how they arrived at the answers?
Attachments

Screen Shot 2017-01-19 at 11.17.59 AM.png
Screen Shot 2017-01-19 at 11.17.59 AM.png [ 88.95 KiB | Viewed 1949 times ]

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 56
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2017, 21:35
1
Schikler's supervisor is 10
10's supervisor is 6
6's supervisor is 14

That's it. Schikler has only 3 supervisors. So, NO.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2017, 05:46
2
1
Got this wrong as well. This is how i think its done:

- O'Neill:
-- First check: supervises no one: 8 (i.e. O'Neill's emp ID) is not present in column 5 -- condition 1 satisfied, now check 2
-- Second check: O'Neill's supervisors (following the supervisor employee IDs mentioned in the last column): 11 >> 4 >> 9 >> 1 >> 6 >> 14 (read as "No.11 supervises O'Neill, 4 supervises 9, 1 supervises 9, and so on) - 14 doesn't count has no.14 is not in HR so 11,4,9,1,6 = 5 supervisors -- check 2 satisfied hence "Yes"

- Patel:
-- First check: Patel's employee ID (i.e. 7) does not feature in column 5 -- cond 1 satisfied, check 2
-- Second check: same as before naming supervisor employee IDs for patel: 3 >> 1 >> 6 >> 14 therefore 4 supervisors -- cond. 2 not satisfied hence "No"

- Schickler:
-- First check: schickler's employee ID does not feature in column 5 -- cond 1 satisfied, check 2
-- Second check: same as before naming supervisor employee IDs for schickler: 10 >> 6 >> 14 therefor 2 supervisors -- cond. 2 no satisfied hence "No"

Surprisingly we dont need to use the hire data here. Any other thoughts?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res &nbs [#permalink] 13 Oct 2017, 05:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The table lists all the employees of the metro corporation's human res

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel



Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.