Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 06:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 897
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 764 [3] , given: 322

Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 00:08
3
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (03:13) correct 45% (02:44) wrong based on 206 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

20. Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as citizens, are not allowed to communicate what we are ready to communicate at our own expense or if other citizens are not permitted access to our communications at their own expense. Public unwillingness to provide funds for certain kinds of scientific, scholarly, or artistic activities cannot, therefore, be described as censorship.
The flawed reasoning in the government officialâ€™s argument is most parallel to that in which one of the following?

(A) All actions that cause unnecessary harm to others are unjust: so if a just action causes harm to others, that action must be necessary.
(B) Since there is more to good manners than simply using polite forms of address, it is not possible to say on first meeting a person whether or not that person has good manners.
(C) Acrophobia, usually defined as a morbid fear of heights, can also mean a morbid fear of sharp objects. Since both fears have the same origin.
(D) There is no doubt that a deed is heroic if the doer risks his or her own life to benefit another person. Thus an action is not heroic if only thing it endangers is the reputation of the doer.
(E) Perception of beauty in an object is determined by past and present influences on the mind of the beholder. Thus on object can be called beautiful, since not everyone will see beauty in it.

Can someone pour in with explanation as mentioned below:

A-> B NOT B -> NOT A

here Public willing (not allowed) => Censorship (Premise)
Public unwilling => Not Censorship.

How above cause effect can be structured inA/B form as explained above

Plz pour in thoughts

source:LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 12-03-2013
WE: General Management (Retail)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 119

Re: Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2013, 03:48
First, sorry about my English, I am still learning.

I am not sure if my reasoning is 100% correct, but I got the right answer, so, it might help.

Clearly, censorship exists if we, as citizens, are not allowed to communicate what we are ready to communicate at our own expense or if other citizens are not permitted access to our communications at their own expense.

For me, the most parallel argument not only should have the "A-> B NOT B -> NOT A", but also should have "something that depends on the person".
The (D) is the only option with this kind of stuff.

(D) There is no doubt that a deed is heroic if the doer risks his or her own life to benefit another person. Thus an action is not heroic if only thing it endangers is the reputation of the doer.

Regards.

-------------
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1132
Location: United States
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 3105 [7] , given: 123

Re: Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2013, 23:17
7
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi TGC

I’m happy to help.

GENERAL THEORIES

This is a parallel reasoning question, but it's more like a flaw of reasoning question, so it’s important to find the fallacy first. If you can’t realize the flaw of reasoning in the stimulus, it’s difficult to pick a correct choice.

This question uses a fallacy, namely, Denying the Antecedent.
The form is:
If A, then B
Conclusion: If Not A, then Not B.

Note: The logic is WRONG.

For example:
If I have 800 GMAT score, I will be accepted at Harvard Business School.
Conclusion: If I don’t have 800 GMAT score, I will NOT be accepted at HBS.
It’s wrong. Even though 800 is exceptional score. If one has 800 GMAT, HBS will accept him. However, 800 GMAT is not the ONLY condition to decide an applicant is accepted or not.

APPLY TO THE QUESTION:

If [as citizens, are not allowed to communicate –OR-- other citizens are not permitted access to our communications], then censorship exists.
Conclusion: if public is unwillingness to provide funds for XYZ, then censorship does NOT exist.

KEY word is “unwillingness” which means people are ALLOWED to provide funds, but not willing to do so. I will paraphrase the conclusion like:
Paraphrased version of conclusion: If public is ALLOWED to provide funds for XYZ, then censorship does NOT exist.

This is an alternate version of “Denying the Antecedent”.
Form used in this question is:
If A is negative (not allowed to...), then B positive (censorship exists).
Conclusion: If A is positive (is allowed to....), then B negative (censorship does not exist).
.
This is a wrong logic.

Only D has a parallel reasoning.

Let examine D:

(D) There is no doubt that a deed is heroic if the doer risks his or her own life to benefit another person. Thus an action is not heroic if only thing it endangers is the reputation of the doer.

The form of D is:
If doer risks his or her own life, then a deed is heroic.
Thus, if doer does not risk his or her own life (the doer only risks his or her reputation), then an action is not a heroic.

Clearly, the conclusion in D has a similar fallacy as we discussed above. Hence, D is the answer.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10367
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Re: Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2014, 08:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 43

Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2014, 00:32
Thanks Pqhai for the explanation.I wasn't even able to understand the argument
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10367
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Re: Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2015, 21:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as   [#permalink] 02 Nov 2015, 21:56
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Government official: Currently many business travelers rely on a 1 17 Sep 2015, 07:19
7 John: There is no God because we cannot prove the existence 4 08 Aug 2016, 07:36
Government funding for the arts must be increased if we 6 26 Nov 2012, 05:01
We doubt that the latest government report will scare 5 09 Feb 2012, 23:40
4 Hutonian Government Official: Federal law requires truck 22 30 Jan 2016, 11:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by